My comment wrt compromise was sarcasm given the obv lack on much of this thread.If your 0.6% number is right, no masquerading is necessary. There are tens of thousands of genuine trans athletes. My guess is that most are already playing on boys or coed teams.
The question is what happens when those tens of thousands of trans athletes are encouraged to join competitive girls teams. Eventually, you get perhaps 20% of non-medicated XY trans athletes competing in girls events. That will be enough to create Lia Thomas headlines all over the country and provoke a backlash.
That’s not a good outcome, for either group. The girls lose their spots and the trans kids get hated for it. (Yes, you can tell people to be accepting. Your words will be better received if you don’t start by kicking someone’s daughter off the basketball team.)
You never answered the question about your preferred compromise. I offered one: create a division for trans kids. What compromise do you prefer?
My comment wrt compromise was sarcasm given the obv lack on much of this thread.
I don’t care. It’s youth sports and given the number of trans kids playing, it doesn’t matter, not least as it’s youth sports.
the whole thing is a culture wars nonsense imv. In the whole thread, and I may have missed it, there are zero examples given of youth teams that people know of that are killing everyone because they have a trans kid, never mind more than 1 trans kid.
There was the ruckus in Utah, I think, where some kid whipped the other team so the parents in the losing team got butt hurt and demanded testing or such with no evidence. Lia Thomas, at collegiate level, is an outlier and even then the time wasn’t a record. 4 cis girls have swam the distance faster. LT was whipped in shorter races also.
it does fascinate me how people get so wound up by this and so I comment every now & then.
Let's hope the Supremes can fix this 100% wrong on little girls and woman. They got Roe v Wade right so that's good. Roe lied just like the men who say that woman can have a penis. If they don't anything soon, we will be left with men like Dr. Levine and Lia telling us to Fu*k off. BTW, I prefer penis over cock.
Good catch GK Slo bo dan avatar.Taking into consideration the report generated from CNN, I don't support this. Trans males should be allowed to compete in youth sports. Let them compete against the boys because that's what they are.
WashingtonCNN —
West Virginia on Thursday asked the US Supreme Court to allow it to enforce a state law that prohibits transgender women and girls from participating in public school sports.
I'd point you to the clip on "Bruno" where Bruno is interviewing the pastor who converts gay people. Apparently this is strictly a "nicht nicht", according to the pastor, even if it reminds Bruno of the "good old days", and is forbidden along with Will & Grace, being fabulous and eating very chocolaty food all the time.Where is Magoo? Thoughts on MTFs saying the woman can have a penis?
These people now what to murder pro life people. They want to murder babies like baby Crush and then murder me for saying, "Please ladies, just don't get pregnant. Use the moon cycle, birth control, condom, celibacy or pull out methods instead of killing a child. Or, give baby away to adoption. Jane was serious and this is not a joke. I have been threaten by EOTL and a few other dads on here for speaking out on the abuse in womans youth soccer. I forgive you Jane but man, you got problems in the after life.
![]()
Joy Behar Protects Jane Fonda After She Says Pro Life Politicians Should Be Murdered
Joy Behar: "besides marching and protesting what else do you suggest?" Fonda: "murder" https://twitter.com/NickFondacaro/status/1634238511426486295?t=HBkmN2ujFPFBu_LRs_4iKQ&s=19rumble.com
Yes or no?I'd point you to the clip on "Bruno" where Bruno is interviewing the pastor who converts gay people. Apparently this is strictly a "nicht nicht", according to the pastor, even if it reminds Bruno of the "good old days", and is forbidden along with Will & Grace, being fabulous and eating very chocolaty food all the time.
The Supreme Court has declined to hear these cases because there's generally no good option here. If the Supreme Court upholds the Virginia law, then instantly the states will split (like Roe v Wade) into blue and red states, basically rendering any sort of national competition impossible. The D states will instantly pass bills expressly a) revising birth certificate standards to conform with California, and b) unconditionally protecting trans athlete involvement in f sports. It raises the possibility of some nuclear options, including full faith and credit given to the birth certificates of the relevant states, and eventually a D bureaucracy (which they currently hold) is going to lower the hammer with a rule on Title IX that smashes the system to pieces (at the very minimum, the principle of equality in women's sports goes by the way side). The Supreme Court would also have to restrict the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, and equal protection of the law, which the conservatives have been loathe to do, because it leaves them vulnerable on several fronts. If the Supreme Court rejects it, it will be taken as a signal that any sort of restriction won't pass scrutiny and they know the activists will then go bezerk on inclusion. So, they've ducked the question repeatedly. Williams V. Kinkaid, also in the 4th circuit, is a pathway forward, by expressly recognizing gender dysphoria as a disability, but the West Virginia law fails as overly broad in that analysis, but it was closely decided by the 4th, and the conservatives will be loathe to abandon the strict construction reading of the ADA which expressly disclaims "gender identity disorder". But, they've already also made themselves half pregnant with recognizing LGTBQ discrimination as sex discrimination in Bostock. It's a big mess.
In Europe, any restrictions under the EU Human Rights charter need to be backed up by research to survive rational scrutiny. The issue is a lot of these sports haven't done the research and that research takes time given the very limited set of data points they have.For what its worth, this is a list of the international sports governing bodies' transgender policies. Appears current except for weightlifting.
.![]()
International Federations | transathlete
International Federations policies for transgender athletes in elite competitions.www.transathlete.com
I think what stands out is how few sports have an actual policy, which just shows were are on the front end of this issue. There is still going to be a lot to shake out. You have swimming (Lia Thomas effect) and cycling becoming more restrictive recently while weightlifting has become more "inclusive". Will the governing bodies lean towards "preserving their sport" or "inclusion". I say let the governing bodies decide and leave the government out of it.
You know I live in squish ambiguity and don't subscribe to black and white answers. My answer is neither and both.Yes or no?
Wow!!!You know I live in squish ambiguity and don't subscribe to black and white answers. My answer is neither and both.
So, you accuse others of failing to compromise, but have no answer other than to tell biological girls to suck it up and deal?My comment wrt compromise was sarcasm given the obv lack on much of this thread.
I don’t care. It’s youth sports and given the number of trans kids playing, it doesn’t matter, not least as it’s youth sports.
the whole thing is a culture wars nonsense imv. In the whole thread, and I may have missed it, there are zero examples given of youth teams that people know of that are killing everyone because they have a trans kid, never mind more than 1 trans kid.
There was the ruckus in Utah, I think, where some kid whipped the other team so the parents in the losing team got butt hurt and demanded testing or such with no evidence. Lia Thomas, at collegiate level, is an outlier and even then the time wasn’t a record. 4 cis girls have swam the distance faster. LT was whipped in shorter races also.
it does fascinate me how people get so wound up by this and so I comment every now & then.
Could the other groups adopt, amend or incorporate the FINA research? Or was it too swimming specific?In Europe, any restrictions under the EU Human Rights charter need to be backed up by research to survive rational scrutiny. The issue is a lot of these sports haven't done the research and that research takes time given the very limited set of data points they have.
Legally it wouldn't survive scrutiny. We generally know that men perform better than women. We recently learned that some of the advantages men receive in puberty can't be erased away. What we don't know is whether x y z treatment, relevant to the particular sport, balance out the advantages. In swimming, where races can be decided by fractions of a second, the impact is very different than say skeet shooting or soccer (where the player is 1 of 11).Could the other groups adopt, amend or incorporate the FINA research? Or was it too swimming specific?
Snooze. You've already won the troll points for this. We've established that you've taken the eotl schtick to an even higher level (sorry old buddy eotl...but I was wrong in what I told watfly....you can take it farther and sotl here has just done it better when he went anti-miscegenation and the cherry on top is the ? of whether he is doing a schtick or is just a garbage human being). I bow before you SOTL to your mastery of it.... this is the point of the party where I ask you if you want something to drink and never come back.
You know I live in squish ambiguity and don't subscribe to black and white answers. My answer is neither and both.