Let's hope the Supremes can fix this 100% wrong on little girls and woman. They got Roe v Wade right so that's good. Roe lied just like the men who say that woman can have a penis. If they don't anything soon, we will be left with men like Dr. Levine and Lia telling us to Fu*k off. BTW, I prefer penis over cock.
Good catch GK Slo bo dan avatar.
rumble.com
I'd point you to the clip on "Bruno" where Bruno is interviewing the pastor who converts gay people. Apparently this is strictly a "nicht nicht", according to the pastor, even if it reminds Bruno of the "good old days", and is forbidden along with Will & Grace, being fabulous and eating very chocolaty food all the time.
These people now what to murder pro life people. They want to murder babies like baby Crush and then murder me for saying, "Please ladies, just don't get pregnant. Use the moon cycle, birth control, condom, celibacy or pull out methods instead of killing a child. Or, give baby away to adoption. Jane was serious and this is not a joke. I have been threaten by EOTL and a few other dads on here for speaking out on the abuse in womans youth soccer. I forgive you Jane but man, you got problems in the after life.
Joy Behar Protects Jane Fonda After She Says Pro Life Politicians Should Be Murdered
Joy Behar: "besides marching and protesting what else do you suggest?" Fonda: "murder" https://twitter.com/NickFondacaro/status/1634238511426486295?t=HBkmN2ujFPFBu_LRs_4iKQ&s=19
www.transathlete.com
Yes or no?
The Supreme Court has declined to hear these cases because there's generally no good option here. If the Supreme Court upholds the Virginia law, then instantly the states will split (like Roe v Wade) into blue and red states, basically rendering any sort of national competition impossible. The D states will instantly pass bills expressly a) revising birth certificate standards to conform with California, and b) unconditionally protecting trans athlete involvement in f sports. It raises the possibility of some nuclear options, including full faith and credit given to the birth certificates of the relevant states, and eventually a D bureaucracy (which they currently hold) is going to lower the hammer with a rule on Title IX that smashes the system to pieces (at the very minimum, the principle of equality in women's sports goes by the way side). The Supreme Court would also have to restrict the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, and equal protection of the law, which the conservatives have been loathe to do, because it leaves them vulnerable on several fronts. If the Supreme Court rejects it, it will be taken as a signal that any sort of restriction won't pass scrutiny and they know the activists will then go bezerk on inclusion. So, they've ducked the question repeatedly. Williams V. Kinkaid, also in the 4th circuit, is a pathway forward, by expressly recognizing gender dysphoria as a disability, but the West Virginia law fails as overly broad in that analysis, but it was closely decided by the 4th, and the conservatives will be loathe to abandon the strict construction reading of the ADA which expressly disclaims "gender identity disorder". But, they've already also made themselves half pregnant with recognizing LGTBQ discrimination as sex discrimination in Bostock. It's a big mess.
In Europe, any restrictions under the EU Human Rights charter need to be backed up by research to survive rational scrutiny. The issue is a lot of these sports haven't done the research and that research takes time given the very limited set of data points they have.For what its worth, this is a list of the international sports governing bodies' transgender policies. Appears current except for weightlifting.
.International Federations | transathlete
International Federations policies for transgender athletes in elite competitions.
I think what stands out is how few sports have an actual policy, which just shows were are on the front end of this issue. There is still going to be a lot to shake out. You have swimming (Lia Thomas effect) and cycling becoming more restrictive recently while weightlifting has become more "inclusive". Will the governing bodies lean towards "preserving their sport" or "inclusion". I say let the governing bodies decide and leave the government out of it.
You know I live in squish ambiguity and don't subscribe to black and white answers. My answer is neither and both.
Wow!!!
So, you accuse others of failing to compromise, but have no answer other than to tell biological girls to suck it up and deal?
Could the other groups adopt, amend or incorporate the FINA research? Or was it too swimming specific?
Legally it wouldn't survive scrutiny. We generally know that men perform better than women. We recently learned that some of the advantages men receive in puberty can't be erased away. What we don't know is whether x y z treatment, relevant to the particular sport, balance out the advantages. In swimming, where races can be decided by fractions of a second, the impact is very different than say skeet shooting or soccer (where the player is 1 of 11).
Snooze. You've already won the troll points for this. We've established that you've taken the eotl schtick to an even higher level (sorry old buddy eotl...but I was wrong in what I told watfly....you can take it farther and sotl here has just done it better when he went anti-miscegenation and the cherry on top is the ? of whether he is doing a schtick or is just a garbage human being). I bow before you SOTL to your mastery of it.
I prefer to reject the concept of all pronouns.
Stating facts isn’t casting accusations. My posts are pretty clear id have thought. I view the impact on youth female athletes as so rare as to be insignificant. I also think youth sports is just kids playing, which is great but still just kids playing.
