Trans eligibility rules for girls sports.

"Cancel culture" is just a term that people use when they're upset about being held accountable for their abysmal behavior. If you want to avoid repercussions for being a horrible person, don't be a horrible person.

I'm not sure how many times I need to say that there is nothing wrong with considering ALL of the relevant factors and deciding that they weigh in favor of one position or another. The problem - including your problem - is that you still can't even admit that the factors that trans children, me, ECNL, CIF, the NCAA, the USWNT, many of Lia Thomas' competitors and others keep identifying to explain why they support trans participation in kiddie sports aren't even legitimate factors to be considered. That is transphobic, pure and simple, no matter how much you claim to pay lip service for having a lot of empathy for trans kids. The reality is you're confusing empathy with being patronizing. If you can't acknowledge that legitimate reasons exist to support allowing trans children playing kiddie soccer, including ECNL, then you're just full of shit and should get used to being called transphobic, because you are. How many times do you think I've challenged you and others to at least recognize that there are legitimate reasons to support trans participation in youth sports? Yet all you can do is pretend I didn't and whine some self-pitying nonsense about getting "cancelled".

Your definition of cancel culture is a hoot. How do you know I have not considered the factors and weighted them differently than you and came to my own conclusions? They are just not yours. I'm very sure you are a smart and educated person. You are also very closed minded. Wishing you the best. Because I disagree with you does not make me phobic.
 
Your definition of cancel culture is a hoot. How do you know I have not considered the factors and weighted them differently than you and came to my own conclusions? They are just not yours. I'm very sure you are a smart and educated person. You are also very closed minded. Wishing you the best. Because I disagree with you does not make me phobic.

I know you have not considered the factors and weighted them differently because you still aren't. Honestly, it's pretty pathetic that you're even asking me "how do you know?", when you could just admit that trans girls have their own athletic disadvantages to cis girls in girls soccer, including those I have discussed earlier, and that those are things that should also be considered alongside any purported "physiological advantage" they might have. But you won't, because you're transphobic. To you, it doesn't matter how much or how many trans girls suffer emotionally, it doesn't matter how little support trans girls typically have from their own parents to participate in sports, it doesn't how horrible the abuse must get forcing trans girls to play on a boys team, none of that matters to you at all. You have made it crystal clear that you will never, ever concede anything that requires considering the humanity of trans children.
 
Your definition of cancel culture is a hoot. How do you know I have not considered the factors and weighted them differently than you and came to my own conclusions? They are just not yours. I'm very sure you are a smart and educated person. You are also very closed minded. Wishing you the best. Because I disagree with you does not make me phobic.

I will also add that it isn't the fact that you weigh something against something else that matters, but WHAT you are willing to weigh. If you can't appreciate that the inevitable abuse that many trans children will face having to play on boys teams should be part of the equation that determines where best to allow trans girls to play, then, yeah you're transphobic. If you can't appreciate that the emotional disadvantages and the lack of support many face from their own parents are factors that should be considered in determining whether trans children even have actual overall athletic advantages, then yeah, you're transphobic.
 
I will also add that it isn't the fact that you weigh something against something else that matters, but WHAT you are willing to weigh. If you can't appreciate that the inevitable abuse that many trans children will face having to play on boys teams should be part of the equation that determines where best to allow trans girls to play, then, yeah you're transphobic. If you can't appreciate that the emotional disadvantages and the lack of support many face from their own parents are factors that should be considered in determining whether trans children even have actual overall athletic advantages, then yeah, you're transphobic.

Give me a break…found you!

1677113977190.jpeg
 
You haven't said anything I materially disagree with. Thoughtful. But that's not what dad4 and perhaps a handful of the others are doing (13 knots is doing his reverse outlaw trolling and crush is just crush). Sure you can argue it isn't healthy for a fat person to be fat. You can try to persuade the overweight person they should lose weight. You can even politely say "hey friend to friend, it's not healthy...you might want to lose a few...I say this because I care and worry about you". But when you repeatedly make little comments that put them down or, in his self-confessed words, are intended to be "rude", something else is going on.
Your main complaint seems to be that I refuse to adopt your language. You object to any term which fails to assert that XY individuals are female.

Therefore, if I use any language to remind people that the athletes in question are biologically male, you two start with the insults.

“Male” isn‘t a put down. It is a neutral description of a fact which you are desperately trying to censor.
 
Your main complaint seems to be that I refuse to adopt your language. You object to any term which fails to assert that XY individuals are female.

Therefore, if I use any language to remind people that the athletes in question are biologically male, you two start with the insults.

“Male” isn‘t a put down. It is a neutral description of a fact which you are desperately trying to censor.
I specifically said I wouldn't have had a problem with it if your point had been they remain biological males. No one here so far has disputed that you can't turn a biological female into a biological female. That's not what you did. You yourself admitted your intent was to be rude. Again, either you have a disability and can't help yourself (change your avatar to a clownfish for example), or you are doing it deliberately and are a horrible horrible person. It's happened more than once as well, and not just your assertion that biological males are biological males.

I'm now hyper curious as to why you even started the thread. It's clear your a hypertriggered. It would be interesting to know the event that caused it. If it was just reading about Lia in the newspaper, time to put down the news.
 
From Feb 9th
Hahaha! Why on earth would you EVER care for EOTL's approval? No one could possibly do more harm to the "cause" they support than EOTL does with his "support". He's an angry, talking point parrot in a frenzied state that renders him incapable of critical thinking - the left's version of the Westboro Baptist Church. If he supports something I say, I check what I said carefully. Of course, even the devil mixes truth with lies ;).

Earlier today
Actually, you’ve talked me out of allowing trans girls in girls rec. That would require an understanding that, if it wasn’t working out, the kid in question could quietly shift over to a boys team.

Your tirades have convinced me that 1% of people would be complete assholes about it, complete with lawsuits and the rest.

So no, I don’t say they should play girls rec. They can play whatever level of boys or coed ball is appropriate to their skill level, just like any other boy.
I enter into evidence, Exhibit A.
 
"Cancel culture" is just a term that people use when they're upset about being held accountable for their abysmal behavior.
Actually "cancel culture" is a tool used by people, often a self-righteous mob, that can't handle, or are offended by, an opposing opinion. Often used in conjunction with cries of the offender being something that ends in "ist" or "phobic".
 
I specifically said I wouldn't have had a problem with it if your point had been they remain biological males. No one here so far has disputed that you can't turn a biological female into a biological female. That's not what you did. You yourself admitted your intent was to be rude. Again, either you have a disability and can't help yourself (change your avatar to a clownfish for example), or you are doing it deliberately and are a horrible horrible person. It's happened more than once as well, and not just your assertion that biological males are biological males.

I'm now hyper curious as to why you even started the thread. It's clear your a hypertriggered. It would be interesting to know the event that caused it. If it was just reading about Lia in the newspaper, time to put down the news.
I started the thread to hear the thoughts of the many intelligent people who are trying to find a way to meet the needs of both the girl athletes and the mtf trans athletes.

There have been several helpful posts, raising issues of the need for all kids to have a place to play, the inherent physical imbalance between men and women, the possible adverse incentive of making rules depend on a medical procedure, the hypocrisy of offering up rec only because our kids are in comp, and so on. The core of a reasonable logical discussion is there.

We also have you and EOTL.
 
I started the thread to hear the thoughts of the many intelligent people who are trying to find a way to meet the needs of both the girl athletes and the mtf trans athletes.

There have been several helpful posts, raising issues of the need for all kids to have a place to play, the inherent physical imbalance between men and women, the possible adverse incentive of making rules depend on a medical procedure, the hypocrisy of offering up rec only because our kids are in comp, and so on. The core of a reasonable logical discussion is there.

We also have you and EOTL.
Haha many of those points were raised by me or eotl. again the issue is being caused by your inability to self reflect on everything from calling all trans “obvious”, mansplaining misogyny to me, heterosplaining gayness to me, and your most recent self admitted “rudeness” among others. Again a more normal person would have engaged in some introspection of why they went over the line, particularly someone who is around these kids and an educator. In conjunction with your entire Covid debacle it leaves the explanation that either you must be disabled and don’t understand what you are doing, or you do and are a horrible person. Too many incidents to just be an innocent coincidence. The only ones here with that many incidents are arguably crush or 13 knots.


From Feb 9th


Earlier today

I enter into evidence, Exhibit A.
I can’t really say you got anything wrong here. I do note however the extremist con position is supported by Mr authoritarian himself , which also says something.
 
Haha many of those points were raised by me or eotl. again the issue is being caused by your inability to self reflect on everything from calling all trans “obvious”, mansplaining misogyny to me, heterosplaining gayness to me, and your most recent self admitted “rudeness” among others. Again a more normal person would have engaged in some introspection of why they went over the line, particularly someone who is around these kids and an educator. In conjunction with your entire Covid debacle it leaves the explanation that either you must be disabled and don’t understand what you are doing, or you do and are a horrible person. Too many incidents to just be an innocent coincidence. The only ones here with that many incidents are arguably crush or 13 knots.



I can’t really say you got anything wrong here. I do note however the extremist con position is supported by Mr authoritarian himself , which also says something.
You raised a great suggestion with respect to creating a third division for college sports.

It's just overwhelmed by your name calling, your contempt for girls sports, and your denialism regarding the athletic gap between men and women.
 
I can’t really say you got anything wrong here. I do note however the extremist con position is supported by Mr authoritarian himself , which also says something.
You can read about the finding in my research paper: "The Reverse Influence of Nutters". Maybe I need to further analyze the effect on individuals with respect to their authoritarian score.
 
You raised a great suggestion with respect to creating a third division for college sports.

It's just overwhelmed by your name calling, your contempt for girls sports, and your denialism regarding the athletic gap between men and women.
I have a strict policy of never initiating (I wasn’t the one who dropped the word “crazy” and in reference to a possible disability with you have avoided any such slur and have expressed only compassion for you). I don’t have a contempt for girls sports— I just don’t think ecnl in any way shape or form compares to the academy programs either here or in Europe. I don’t deny the athletic gap…my tests are do we care about the cheaters and can we balance that gap. If not we must make some other accommodation. It’s a long pattern with you if bending your opponents beliefs. Again I can only hope you do so because you do not have full comprehension and it is something innocent instead of bad faith.

it doesn’t surprise me I am shocked by you. The authoritarianism hypocrisy and safetyism you had with Covid was enough to shock me. Your behavior here, whether the mainsplaining misogyny to me, the heterosplaining gayness, the shocking self-interest, the questionableness of the words “creature” and “queer”, the remark that all trans people were “obvious”, the Greer remark, the ingenerosity in that you demand it’s all about the bow for cis girls but then you callously turn around and deny the same for trans kids, the blatant hysteria baiting, and your most recent masterpiece of self admitted rudeness (a remark which was clearly intended to put down trans kids as it could have been made in a non rude way) has horrified me. Again for your sake I pray this is a disability and you do not know what you do. Because otherwise it’s a horror an educator would view the world that way in this day and age.
 
Haha many of those points were raised by me or eotl. again the issue is being caused by your inability to self reflect on everything from calling all trans “obvious”, mansplaining misogyny to me, heterosplaining gayness to me, and your most recent self admitted “rudeness” among others. Again a more normal person would have engaged in some introspection of why they went over the line, particularly someone who is around these kids and an educator. In conjunction with your entire Covid debacle it leaves the explanation that either you must be disabled and don’t understand what you are doing, or you do and are a horrible person. Too many incidents to just be an innocent coincidence. The only ones here with that many incidents are arguably crush or 13 knots.



I can’t really say you got anything wrong here. I do note however the extremist con position is supported by Mr authoritarian himself , which also says something.
Throw Back Thursday
I tried to leave but you keep mentioning my name with Outlaw. I remember Outlaw getting so mad at me because I would start with, "my dd..." This is Crush in 2000. I played dress up, I won't lie. I loved it and had so much fun that evening, especially the attention I got from the ladies. I love all people. Like I said many many many many many many many times, I just don't want what a Lia soccer player against the girls in college. I also said co-ed works for me early on. At the highest level of sport, it has to be bio males vs bio males and bio females vs bio females. I really do feel like a woman on the inside Grace. The crazy folks over at Truth Social have accused me of being a woman at least 6+ times now for how I write. I write how I feel. If any of my satire hurt your or EOTL feelings, I sorry.

Woman.jpg
 
Last edited:
Transphobia is "a different perspective", that is true. It is one thing to consider ALL of the relevant factors on both sides and then state your opinion that you believe they weigh in favor of one position or the other, but it is transphobic to deny that the reasons supporting trans participation in kiddie soccer are even legitimate factors to be weighed in the first place. Not a single person here who opposes allowing trans children to play kiddie soccer is even willing to recognize that trans children, CIF, ECNL, the NCAA, the USWNT, and even many of Lia Thomas' competitors have a single legitimate basis to support their position on the matter. It's pretty appalling that none of you can muster even a miniscule amount of empathy for their interests in this matter.

It doesn't matter how polite someone is about denying the legitimacy of the societal interests that support allowing trans children to play kiddie soccer with other girls. If you can't admit that legitimate factors support trans participation support participation, if you refuse to admit that very different factors support participation in kiddie soccer that don't apply to Lia Thomas and that the two situations should be evaluated much differently, then, yeah, you're transphobic. Honestly, wasting your time trying to convince me that I am wrong while ignoring one maliciously inappropriate transphobic comment after the next on this site is transphobic.

I concede that you aren't nearly as bad as someone like dad4 who called Brittney Griner a man and who mocks gender pronouns.
such nonsense...societal interests, kiddie soccer, Lia Thomas, ECNL, NCAA, USWNT, CIF...blah, blah...AND you throw in word EMPATHY.

You've created the transphobe boogeyman that lurks in this thread.
 
I know you have not considered the factors and weighted them differently because you still aren't. Honestly, it's pretty pathetic that you're even asking me "how do you know?", when you could just admit that trans girls have their own athletic disadvantages to cis girls in girls soccer, including those I have discussed earlier, and that those are things that should also be considered alongside any purported "physiological advantage" they might have. But you won't, because you're transphobic. To you, it doesn't matter how much or how many trans girls suffer emotionally, it doesn't matter how little support trans girls typically have from their own parents to participate in sports, it doesn't how horrible the abuse must get forcing trans girls to play on a boys team, none of that matters to you at all. You have made it crystal clear that you will never, ever concede anything that requires considering the humanity of trans children.
how do you know all of this?
 
I have a strict policy of never initiating (I wasn’t the one who dropped the word “crazy” and in reference to a possible disability with you have avoided any such slur and have expressed only compassion for you). I don’t have a contempt for girls sports— I just don’t think ecnl in any way shape or form compares to the academy programs either here or in Europe. I don’t deny the athletic gap…my tests are do we care about the cheaters and can we balance that gap. If not we must make some other accommodation. It’s a long pattern with you if bending your opponents beliefs. Again I can only hope you do so because you do not have full comprehension and it is something innocent instead of bad faith.

it doesn’t surprise me I am shocked by you. The authoritarianism hypocrisy and safetyism you had with Covid was enough to shock me. Your behavior here, whether the mainsplaining misogyny to me, the heterosplaining gayness, the shocking self-interest, the questionableness of the words “creature” and “queer”, the remark that all trans people were “obvious”, the Greer remark, the ingenerosity in that you demand it’s all about the bow for cis girls but then you callously turn around and deny the same for trans kids, the blatant hysteria baiting, and your most recent masterpiece of self admitted rudeness (a remark which was clearly intended to put down trans kids as it could have been made in a non rude way) has horrified me. Again for your sake I pray this is a disability and you do not know what you do. Because otherwise it’s a horror an educator would view the world that way in this day and age.
Proposing to study something to death instead of acting is itself a form of denialism.
 
Proposing to study something to death instead of acting is itself a form of denialism.
Again unclear whether you are clouded by bias or you have a disability and you aren’t able to understand the moving parts. You clearly aren’t stupid so I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt here. The only thing the studies have shown us is that as a result of puberty men have an athletic advantage over women. What’s been new and only in the last 10-15 years or so (and undermines all the assumptions built up in the 80s and 90s) is the assumptions of balancing have been wrong because of what happens during puberty. Also that our assumption of ftms have been wrong hence the new concerns there. The work that hasn’t been done is whether stricter rebalancing works, and what impact the new assumptions make, which has to be done sport by sport and with few data points (the small number of trans athletes who are on rebalancing and who are willing to be tracked). That’s science. Not your let’s believe at fauci but everything the experts have to say about this subject is wrong. And there’s no rush. There will be lias. They’ll adjust. Eventually we’ll know for sure but it will take time. And if a rebalancing doesn’t work you must propose an alternate solution because dumping both directions in the men’s division isn’t “fair” either. Again hoping it’s a disability.
 
Back
Top