Spain Women and thoughts on ECNL

[Luis Andres]

I‘ve known Mel since she was 9 years old. DD played with Mel and her dad‘s/uncle’s futsal club for years. Jill Ellis use to drop in Friday nights to watch our group play. That’s how Jill got connected with Mel.
So futsal played the right way, I know a “little” about that. Already watched in person the youth USA national team play against Barca and Royal Madrid youth teams over the fast few years. Competitive, and the US team showed well. Every year we won nationals we got the invite to Europe. Go if you want, but it’s a money grab. Best part is the tours of Camp Nou, La Masia, and the Bernabau. My opinion, if u want the full experience, go to the USYF national team selection tryouts in KC, and do it with the National team. Some years they go to S America instead. But it’s still a money grab.

That’s awesome man. We are actually going to this United World futsal cup and playing with our team. She’s been on the team for the past few years and they earned the trip to go. We were suppose to go before but covid hit. Players go free for winning Nationals. We going to Spain for 2 weeks. 1st week in Madrid to check out Real Madrid Academy for soccer and the second week we’ll be doing the futsal. I’ve never been to Spain so for me it’s like a vacation and I get to see what best girls out there are made of. Measure her up.

https://www.unitedfutsal.com/world-futsal-cup

 

[rainbow_unicorn]

Getting back on topic, change needs to come from top down (US Soccer needing to commit long term to changing their style of play) and from bottom up (parents over-the-top desire to win and collect trophies).

I spoke with a coach and he was saying how youngers parents are getting worse each year and demanding wins...otherwise they jump ship for other clubs that are winning trophies. Consequently coaches are changing their style to play more direct (more effective for wins at youngers age).

 

[Carlsbad7]

Getting back on topic, change needs to come from top down (US Soccer needing to commit long term to changing their style of play) and from bottom up (parents over-the-top desire to win and collect trophies).

I spoke with a coach and he was saying how youngers parents are getting worse each year and demanding wins...otherwise they jump ship for other clubs that are winning trophies. Consequently coaches are changing their style to play more direct (more effective for wins at youngers age).

As a coach wins equal $$$ and more players. When you're talking about youngers the biggest ones that sexually mature first get picked first.

For parents being on the top team equals the most gratification in the sewing circle. Also, because clubs drop and gain new players every year via tryouts it makes everyone crazy.

Combine both and you get the situation we have today with the USWNT.

The only way I can see that things change is if leagues or tournaments implement serious changes to the rules.

Things like...
- No goalie punts until 11v11
- 5 passes before shots on goal
- Only one goal per player. (once they score they have to wear a penny)
- Each coach gives half of their players to the other team before the game and has to figure out how to win. (Or make it more fun have a shootout before the game + whoever misses their shot has to play with the other team.)

The idea is to focus on team play vs individual effort. Different kids develop at different rates + in the end team play will provide more players more opportunities to become top talent.

 

[LASTMAN14]

On Youtube If you type in;
FC Barcelona U15 v LAFC Slammers U15 Full Match

You can watch Barcelona's Academy team and LAFC (Koge Slammers) from a few years ago. Please do not take this wrong as I know several of the players and families on this Koge team. It's not to disparage them but rather just to show the contrast of play at the youth level. As you know this is the Koge team who won two ECNL championships and is filled with youth national team players and division 1 players.

 

[RandomSoccerFan]

Things like...
- No goalie punts until 11v11
- 5 passes before shots on goal
- Only one goal per player. (once they score they have to wear a penny)
- Each coach gives half of their players to the other team before the game and has to figure out how to win. (Or make it more fun have a shootout before the game + whoever misses their shot has to play with the other team.)

The idea is to focus on team play vs individual effort. Different kids develop at different rates + in the end team play will provide more players more opportunities to become top talent.

Interesting thought experiments - but as far as I can tell some of them are so divorced from reality that it's unlikely. Goalie punt bans & 5 passes before goal may be able to be implemented, it's just unlikely to catch on. Basketball does some similar things for the youngers, for example not allowing a young team to press - sometimes throughout the game, sometimes all but the last quarter, etc. The intent is to keep a strong team from entirely preventing another team from even learning enough to get to offense - instead of being pressured to the extent that they aren't actually learning anything useful in their own backcourt.

I do squint a bit at all of the recommendations to focus on development over winning. Of course that's the end goal, the primary goal, etc. But raise your hand if you yourself kept your soccer-crazed kid on a losing team for more than a year or two. It's like there's this belief that there are all of these teams that are doing incredible development work but end up with teams with terrible records - and more enlightened parents should be choosing those instead of teams/coaches that are winning - but winning the "wrong" way. Would be great to highlight some (or any) such clubs/teams - because I'm not sure they actually exist.

Because what I have seen instead - over quite a few years of this silliness with multiple kids and various teams, leagues, and even sports, is that if a team is consistently losing the team will fail to exist in a year or two. Whether you ride it to the end as the rosters completely turn over every season, or are the first ones out the door - the end result is the same - there aren't ever going to be enough players to stick around as a cohesive unit to learn/grow/mature on a consistently losing team, perhaps unless geography/logistics means there are really zero other options.

I fully understand, and have experienced, that there are clubs/teams who aren't fully optimizing for wins at all costs - to promote development of many/all players instead - and these are probably where you'd want to end up if given various options. It's just that those same teams/clubs/coaches, are usually quite successful (even when judged small-mindedly only by wins), even without such a focus or optimization for wins.

 

[kickingandscreaming]

Wouldn't you agree that if US soccer made futsal a requirement for the younger ages then it may help? The problem is not enough kids play futsal. So you will never have that pool of players. In other countries like Brazil and Spain, if you play soccer you also play futsal when you were young. It's part of the culture.

I think futsal is a wise addition. However, I’m focused on the training time when they are with their soccer team. Think about the logistics of it. The futsal training cannot be held on the same field as soccer. If more “soccer” was spent developing technical and possession skills, that’s a win. I’m also trying to leverage our culture’s strong desire to win by adding a game that rewards the skills we see as lacking. We are in the choir. We believe in this type of development already. We need to reach the masses at their level.

 

[Grace T.]

Interesting thought experiments - but as far as I can tell some of them are so divorced from reality that it's unlikely. Goalie punt bans & 5 passes before goal may be able to be implemented, it's just unlikely to catch on. Basketball does some similar things for the youngers, for example not allowing a young team to press - sometimes throughout the game, sometimes all but the last quarter, etc. The intent is to keep a strong team from entirely preventing another team from even learning enough to get to offense - instead of being pressured to the extent that they aren't actually learning anything useful in their own backcourt.

I do squint a bit at all of the recommendations to focus on development over winning. Of course that's the end goal, the primary goal, etc. But raise your hand if you yourself kept your soccer-crazed kid on a losing team for more than a year or two. It's like there's this belief that there are all of these teams that are doing incredible development work but end up with teams with terrible records - and more enlightened parents should be choosing those instead of teams/coaches that are winning - but winning the "wrong" way. Would be great to highlight some (or any) such clubs/teams - because I'm not sure they actually exist.

Because what I have seen instead - over quite a few years of this silliness with multiple kids and various teams, leagues, and even sports, is that if a team is consistently losing the team will fail to exist in a year or two. Whether you ride it to the end as the rosters completely turn over every season, or are the first ones out the door - the end result is the same - there aren't ever going to be enough players to stick around as a cohesive unit to learn/grow/mature on a consistently losing team, perhaps unless geography/logistics means there are really zero other options.

I fully understand, and have experienced, that there are clubs/teams who aren't fully optimizing for wins at all costs - to promote development of many/all players instead - and these are probably where you'd want to end up if given various options. It's just that those same teams/clubs/coaches, are usually quite successful (even when judged small-mindedly only by wins), even without such a focus or optimization for wins.

My experience on the boys end, particularly with Coast is that those teams tend to "grind". Because of pro/rel, they finished mid-table, did not get promotion, the best players leave the team, the coach is forced to start over which means new players need to learn which means the old players get frustrated when the same result happens. Eventually those teams grind their way up slowly from flight 3 to maybe finish at the end flight 1, but with little chance of anything higher as any talented or hard working players are by then long gone. The teams that exploded were teams that were placed in the wrong bracket: for example, one team where the club broke apart due to some financial irregularities, my son once played on a silver team that blew up because it didn't have enough players (they'd lose if they only had 10 or 9 show up out of 12), an AYSO team playing for the first time in bronze, a team where half the players were 1 year younger but they wanted to hold the group together.

The mega clubs for that reason have streamlined placement (along with self placement in Socal league). I'd argue it's one of the positive developments of the rise of the mega club, assuming placement actually worked towards the ideal. Theoretically, the club would have a large pool of players, and since they control the placement of players in pretty much a monopoly for the area, they assign the player to the proper level given their development. There are 4 problems with this ideal: 1. the letter league shuffle and the fact we don't have a unified pyramid on either the boys or girls end means there is no streamlined system, 2. the mega clubs still have an incentive to win and the easiest way to do it is still to get the early/tallest bloomers, 3. politics and the fact that decisions are often made for reasons other than merit, and 4. the shiny new object problem (which really can't be fixed with the transfer fee laws being the way they are). If you compare any MLS Next boys team to a clubs flight 2 team around the age of 13, the deciding factor is that the MLS Next boys team has an average a foot of height on the flight 2 team and look like they are 2 years older.

The way Spain works out on the everyone plays rec level is there is a consortium of clubs for the areas. There are tryouts where year to year you are placed in different levels. Placement doesn't really matter because rec really is about just having fun and competition. The pros have been separated into the academy track and there is no college track. So the stakes of getting misplaced are very low. The English system is much more like ours, but again, the pros have been separated out from a very early age and there is no college track.

 

[watfly]

The one player from San Diego Waves Melanie Barcenas, the 15 year old who got signed not too long ago played futsal and she was very good at it. Argusbly the best player in her age group at the time. My DD looks up to her so she has been a role model to her,

My 07 son used to play her in futsal often when he was younger. She destroyed the boys.

 

[Carlsbad7]

Interesting thought experiments - but as far as I can tell some of them are so divorced from reality that it's unlikely. Goalie punt bans & 5 passes before goal may be able to be implemented, it's just unlikely to catch on. Basketball does some similar things for the youngers, for example not allowing a young team to press - sometimes throughout the game, sometimes all but the last quarter, etc. The intent is to keep a strong team from entirely preventing another team from even learning enough to get to offense - instead of being pressured to the extent that they aren't actually learning anything useful in their own backcourt.

I do squint a bit at all of the recommendations to focus on development over winning. Of course that's the end goal, the primary goal, etc. But raise your hand if you yourself kept your soccer-crazed kid on a losing team for more than a year or two. It's like there's this belief that there are all of these teams that are doing incredible development work but end up with teams with terrible records - and more enlightened parents should be choosing those instead of teams/coaches that are winning - but winning the "wrong" way. Would be great to highlight some (or any) such clubs/teams - because I'm not sure they actually exist.

Because what I have seen instead - over quite a few years of this silliness with multiple kids and various teams, leagues, and even sports, is that if a team is consistently losing the team will fail to exist in a year or two. Whether you ride it to the end as the rosters completely turn over every season, or are the first ones out the door - the end result is the same - there aren't ever going to be enough players to stick around as a cohesive unit to learn/grow/mature on a consistently losing team, perhaps unless geography/logistics means there are really zero other options.

I fully understand, and have experienced, that there are clubs/teams who aren't fully optimizing for wins at all costs - to promote development of many/all players instead - and these are probably where you'd want to end up if given various options. It's just that those same teams/clubs/coaches, are usually quite successful (even when judged small-mindedly only by wins), even without such a focus or optimization for wins.

The "Build out" line is already a thing for ulittles so goalies not being able to punt until 11v11 isn't that big of a deal.

Top teams already implement 5 passes before shooting when they're blowing out a competitor.

Only one goal per player per game would drive parents and coaches insane. But, it would also highlight the player that scored for recruiters. It would prevent the boot it up to the big fast kid teams from winning.

Teams swapping half their players before a game would dramatically make everyone playing better. Now not only are players being forced to play against players that they're not used to (which is the why we play games against other teams) they're also being forced to play with players that they're not used to. This is what's going to happen anyway (play with and against players they're not used to) if they play in college or pro might as well get players used to it when they're young.

The teams swapping half their players concept also diffuses concerns from both teams that if they play one will gain while the other potentially loses a ranking. Would drive the pay to play parents and win at all costs people nuts.

 

[Grace T.]

The "Build out" line is already a thing for ulittles so goalies not being able to punt until 11v11 isn't that big of a deal.

Top teams already implement 5 passes before shooting when they're blowing out a competitor.

Only one goal per player per game would drive parents and coaches insane. But, it would also highlight the player that scored for recruiters. It would prevent the boot it up to the big fast kid teams from winning.

Teams swapping half their players before a game would dramatically make everyone playing better. Now not only are players being forced to play against players that they're not used to (which is the why we play games against other teams) they're also being forced to play with players that they're not used to. This is what's going to happen anyway (play with and against players they're not used to) if they play in college or pro might as well get players used to it when they're young.

The teams swapping half their players concept also diffuses concerns from both teams that if they play one will gain while the other potentially loses a ranking. Would drive the pay to play parents and win at all costs people nuts.

My buddy and I went through our licenses together and had our kids start club soccer together. When they put the build out line in place, he swore to me that it would convince coaches once and for all that kick ball was dumb and the year after the first squads were aged out of the build out line, they'd never go back to punting again. We made a bet. I said his position was nonsense and as soon as you took off the line, they'd go back to their old ways. I still have that bottle of scotch on my shelf.

 

[Ellejustus]

As a coach wins equal $$$ and more players. When you're talking about youngers the biggest ones that sexually mature first get picked first.

For parents being on the top team equals the most gratification in the sewing circle. Also, because clubs drop and gain new players every year via tryouts it makes everyone crazy.

Combine both and you get the situation we have today with the USWNT.

The only way I can see that things change is if leagues or tournaments implement serious changes to the rules.

Things like...
- No goalie punts until 11v11
- 5 passes before shots on goal
- Only one goal per player. (once they score they have to wear a penny)
- Each coach gives half of their players to the other team before the game and has to figure out how to win. (Or make it more fun have a shootout before the game + whoever misses their shot has to play with the other team.)

The idea is to focus on team play vs individual effort. Different kids develop at different rates + in the end team play will provide more players more opportunities to become top talent.

Hoosiers Futbol Style Grace. Gene Hackman taught those boys how to move the ball around without scoring. I liken futbol more like dancing with a ball and then running. I chased the medals, I confess. How on earth did they know that a dad like me would drive anywhere to win a championship.

 

[Ellejustus]

My buddy and I went through our licenses together and had our kids start club soccer together. When they put the build out line in place, he swore to me that it would convince coaches once and for all that kick ball was dumb and the year after the first squads were aged out of the build out line, they'd never go back to punting again. We made a bet. I said his position was nonsense and as soon as you took off the line, they'd go back to their old ways. I still have that bottle of scotch on my shelf.

Surf was the only team in Socal playing possession futbol when my little one was balling. Is that still the case? I remember watching them pass from the back and no punts allowed. We spanked Earthquakes and proved to the country that possession is not only fun and safe, but it wins natty. We were #1 in the country after all the parents came together to chase a medal together in 2016-2017 season. The players were first developed into a passing player, or they sit on the bench. Then the player is taught 2 touch or pass and if you don;t you come out. It also takes team chemistry, with the hardwork and sacrifice to develop a winner and the reward of the Natty. My dd team won the Lamar Hunt Soccer Natty. Oldest Soccer Trophy in our Country. Messi is playing for one.

 

[kickingandscreaming]

Getting back on topic, change needs to come from top down (US Soccer needing to commit long term to changing their style of play) and from bottom up (parents over-the-top desire to win and collect trophies).

I spoke with a coach and he was saying how youngers parents are getting worse each year and demanding wins...otherwise they jump ship for other clubs that are winning trophies. Consequently coaches are changing their style to play more direct (more effective for wins at youngers age).

The loss of our USWNT in the World Cup puts us in a position where the influence of the “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” crowd is diminished. It’s an opportunity to implement change. At the very least, bring in a leader who is willing to identify our developmental shortcomings and articulate a workable solution. Create videos of training “games” to develop these skills. Let everyone know that when they come into a USYNT camp that this type of training will be an important part of player evaluation. It’s a start that is easy and cheap.

 

[Ellejustus]

The loss of our USWNT in the World Cup puts us in a position where the influence of the “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” crowd is diminished. It’s an opportunity to implement change. At the very least, bring in a leader who is willing to identify our developmental shortcomings and articulate a workable solution. Create videos of training “games” to develop these skills. Let everyone know that when they come into a USYNT camp that this type of training will be an important part of player evaluation. It’s a start that is easy and cheap.

A true leader that answers to no one and is not bought, is hard to find. What is a True Leader? Simply put, a true leader leads by example, fostering strong relationships with individuals (no pay for play with politics and kickbacks with rich dads driving the car) and teams alike and ensuring that all reach their full potential while, importantly, achieving organizational goals.

 

[Desert Hound]

On Youtube If you type in;
FC Barcelona U15 v LAFC Slammers U15 Full Match

You can watch Barcelona's Academy team and LAFC (Koge Slammers) from a few years ago. Please do not take this wrong as I know several of the players and families on this Koge team. It's not to disparage them but rather just to show the contrast of play at the youth level. As you know this is the Koge team who won two ECNL championships and is filled with youth national team players and division 1 players.

Good video.

A rather interesting difference in playing styles.

This is what the other countries are teaching their youth players.

It is going to get tough.

 

[espola]

My buddy and I went through our licenses together and had our kids start club soccer together. When they put the build out line in place, he swore to me that it would convince coaches once and for all that kick ball was dumb and the year after the first squads were aged out of the build out line, they'd never go back to punting again. We made a bet. I said his position was nonsense and as soon as you took off the line, they'd go back to their old ways. I still have that bottle of scotch on my shelf.

The build-out line was a silly attempt to accomplish better coaching by doing what they could -- change the rules.

 

[watfly]

At the very least, bring in a leader who is willing to identify our developmental shortcomings and articulate a workable solution.

My concern is that the arrogance of US Soccer prevents this from being possible.

 

[WillJohn]

Good video.

A rather interesting difference in playing styles.

This is what the other countries are teaching their youth players.

It is going to get tough.

Agreed. It will be interesting to see how Onyeka progresses on their B team. Honing the technical and tactical abilities with her superior athleticism and speed it's going to be fun to watch her develop. I think it's just a matter of time before she makes it to the top team and is an impact player.

 

[rainbow_unicorn]

On Youtube If you type in;
FC Barcelona U15 v LAFC Slammers U15 Full Match

You can watch Barcelona's Academy team and LAFC (Koge Slammers) from a few years ago. Please do not take this wrong as I know several of the players and families on this Koge team. It's not to disparage them but rather just to show the contrast of play at the youth level. As you know this is the Koge team who won two ECNL championships and is filled with youth national team players and division 1 players.

I think the Barcelona v PDA game was even worse. PDA looked awful...ECNL kick ball at its finest.

The US does have the ability to play good soccer right now from the youth to senior teams. San Jose Earthquakes 04's were a good example of this:
2019 Development Academy Finals: U15 Girls Final - Colorado Rush vs. San Jose Earthquakes

 

[rainbow_unicorn]

It just takes a conscious effort to play a better way with the right coaches and players. We need to acknowledge that only playing direct at the youngers ages is bad and call out those clubs that do this (and we all know which clubs do this).