Glitterhater
SILVER ELITE
This is exactly what I was saying on another thread this morning. I do think he means well- but he's at the point now where he should just stick to what he knows and let someone else do the media stuff.Fauci means well, but is in way over his head. His answers are easily influenced by whoever is interviewing him or the loaded questions they ask him. He is easily steered to a point of view. He is far from a public health policy leader which requires you to not only look at the issue at hand but also the ramifications of each decision (or interview you give) you make to address the issue.
I posted this at the beginning of the pandemic about how we need to be careful about relying on experts for projections.
![]()
Why Experts are Almost Always Wrong
No one, not even the experts, really knows what's about to happenwww.smithsonianmag.com
Doesn't matter if the projection is negative or positive. At one point the IHME had reduced their projection as low as around 60,000-80,000 deaths (I don't remember the exact number). I don't care how smart you are, no one can predict the future with any degree of certainty.
Projecting what the virus will do is also not a math problem. The virus doesn't follow a predictable path.
Experts are great for telling us what happened, but they're effectively worthless at telling us what will happen.
I do think now that interviewers know this- and have no problems trying to put him in the hot seat. The man is 80, I'm sure he did not expect to be in this position at this juncture!