Actually, I was using the prior posters 20% example and ran with it, and bringing up the Pareto Principle since it matched. Not making up numbers...although the Pareto Principle does have some merit. I’d be willing to wager that 80%+ percent of the deaths are from a 20%- group: age, pre-existing, etc...Focus the effort on the 20% not the 100%...I’m not talking about this in terms of soccer...my kid will done with soccer around 22...she will have 70 more years + on the earth god willing...soccer is a thing she does, not who she is, and is not the most important thing in the world by a long shot. She does love it, and does want to play. In fact they have camps starting Sunday and she can’t wait.
I’m suggesting that we have adjusted plans for groups that are more at risk than others and that it should not be a one-size-fits all approach....the absolutes are getting real old...all cops are racist, everyone carries the same risk, etc...blah...blah...blah. I support wearing a mask and following the rules/laws even if I don’t necessarily agree with them.
I actually said in an earlier post that I agree with what Newsome did originally and lock us down, as we had very little information at the time. Things change over time and the lack of creativity, and leadership is astonishing, but I digress. All these little tweaks and rules give the appearance of action when none is really being taken. It’s an illusion. My numbers were the 200k (death count)/340mm (est. us pop). They were back of the napkin used for perspective. Not intended for Govt or commercial use.
The Pareto principle, by its very nature is a fake thing. Giving a fake thing a name that includes the word principle in it doesn’t make something real. It only show the desperation of those who have neither facts nor science on their side try to convince themselves that they do. According to the Pareto principle, 80% of anti-vaxxers are really stupid, whereas the remaining 20% are really, really stupid. Cuz the Pareto Principle proves it.