Errr....if your limiting principle is first amendment activities should be allowed but other businesses are expendable, it would be an o.k. limiting principle. But realize the implications of what you are saying. First amendment restrictions must be content neutral. That means Trump rallies, antiabortion pickets and even KKK marches must be o.k. That also means 4th of July celebrations if privately organized must be allowed to go on. The line of flag burning cases made very clear that this is speech, and as such is not subject to Constitutional restrictions. Also protected under the 1st amendment is religion. It means worship service,s funerals, and weddings (at least religious ones) are protected as well.
Next, even if the protests can't be limited that doesn't mean that government figures shouldn't say they aren't a great idea. But some have even gone out of their way to encourage them as an exception, saying social justice is just way too important. That had the secondary effect of convincing much of the public the experts weren't serious about anything (including masks) and they should just have at it. So in a very real way, the protestor are ver responsible for what's happened. As I wrote above, I think the primary driver of this is now private gatherings and short of Chinese style house arrest I'm not sure any lockdowns or mask orders will do anything.
Lastly, your accusation of racism is not only insulting but bigoted. I'm a 4x minority and have experienced discrimination in my life 4 different ways. Please check your privilege. How many minority credits you got?
Here we go again with the passive voice. There is no “should be allowed” with respect to these protests because there is no person to either allow or not allow them. Unlike like Trump rallies in which a single person controls whether they will happen or not, there is nothing that can stop these protests from happening even when they violate the law. I agree with you that if a 100,000 Klan members want to march down Hollywood Blvd, I won’t complain about the impact on the pandemic. I even believe none of our leaders should schedule mass gatherings, and am grateful there is only one, and he doesn’t carry a lot of weight (figuratively speaking of course). I understand that our leaders also cannot do the impossible and stop a hundreds of thousands of people who decide to get together in a single place. I also understand there aren’t enough handcuffs and jail cells to handle the millions of those protesting civil rights violations nationwide, but there are plenty to deal with 20 Klan members who want to give it a shot. We also know from experience that government attempts to stop protests by shooting people with rubber bullets and tear gas only leads to billions in property damage. And you people claim there’s no benefit from the looting and vandalism caused by rioting. Sometimes practical realities dictate how our government enforces the law whether you like it or not.
Your interpretation of the 1st amendment is mind-bogglingly stupid. In your defense, it’s what happens when dotards with no idea what they’re talking about argue when they aren’t getting what they want.
Your freedom of religion non-sense argument is even worse, but I enjoy pointing out how dumb god people are. Your position has already been argued and rejected many times over. The shelter-in-place rules are neutral and apply equally to you god people and everyone else. You people think you’re entitled not only to equal treatment but also to special treatment and can do whatever they want because, well, god. It is such a joy to see your shock when you’re told god doesn’t mean s**t under the law, and you don’t get to mistreat other people, and you also don’t get to be treated better than anyone else. You just get to be treated the same. If I can’t have my ACLU meeting, you can’t go to your church meeting to whine how unfair it is that gay folk get to eat a cake at their weddings and have it too. Woot woot. Thank, uh, god for Zoom