Vaccine

crush said:
Most of us all have some sort of imbalance in these traits in our genes.
Click to expand...

Not imbalance. Just the complexity of being human. If you learn to love the craziness of it, it all works out. So, for me, when it comes to Biblical millstones Isaiah 47 > Matthew 18. Isaiah 47 is some wild poetic stuff.
 
Emma said:
He dressed up like a woman, with nice VS undergarments too, but it was just to flirt with men, not get physical with them. Wonder why he needed the VS undergarments. How do the men Mike is flirting with know Mike is wearing VS undergarments? Whatever works for you Crush.
Click to expand...
I didn't ask mike for the steamy details and it's none of my business Emma. He told his wife he likes to dress up after he got caught with VS on his CC. What works for me is being honest and up front about secrets before getting caught. I don't care what two married people do and play but I think they both should agree on the games in and outside of the bedroom. Let's not judge others is my point but look for being honest, open and transparent. Have a great day and get ready for true freedom :) You will be able to be you and that is all one should want. You can be you and I will be me and Mike will be Mike and David and his wife will be what they want. Its the lying that makes people lie more and hide in the darkness. Men love darkness and fear the light and fear their deeds will be exposed. I say expose them and seek help if you need it.
 
Last edited:
EvilGoalie 21 said:
Not imbalance. Just the complexity of being human. If you learn to love the craziness of it, it all works out. So, for me, when it comes to Biblical millstones Isaiah 47 > Matthew 18. Isaiah 47 is some wild poetic stuff.
Click to expand...
I scored 16/4 on the M vs F scale a few months. Meaning I am 80% more feminine then masculine. Outside I am a full man and I love being a man, let me tell you and my wife loves that I love being man. Inside however, I am more of women. I was raised by an amazing women who fostered 8 kids after having four of her own and she taught me cooking, sewing, cleaning the house and so much more. My life coach told me months ago that I needed to be more of a balance of the M vs F and not be such a bitch at home. I'm serious, I used to have a hissy fit if the house was not clean. My wife would go full masculine on me and stop talking to me when i would get all huff and puff. We both went the opposite of our physical nature when these things happened. I am more like 12/8 now with more improvements to come. My wife can stay in the feminine way more and open herself up to me always because I am learning to be a better man and also have the patience and softness of a women. My wife digs it and I love it more this way. Peace out Evil :)
 
dad4 said:
Regarding bio banding, parents won’t go for it unless you can explain it.

Birthdays are simple. We understand them. I can look at the birth certificate and tell you their age group. So can anyone. Easy.

Biobands are not simple. You might have one definition for how to measure someone’s developmental age, but other people will want a different definition. Very few of us can figure out our kids adjusted age. Even if we can figure it out, it seems unstable. Do they age up every time they have a growth spurt? Maybe, maybe not.

This is why biobands are useful only for someone like USSoccer or Southhampton. If you need to evaluate 200 kids and the payoff is signing the next Mbappe, biobands can help, and they are worth the trouble. If you need to evaluate 2,000,000 kids and the payoff is slightly fairer rec games, you’re not going to bother.

And, despite what parents want to believe, ECNL and GA have more in common with rec soccer than with Mbappe.
Click to expand...

Yeah, probably the most accurate definition of what rec soccer is or is not probably has to do with who is writing the checks.

But on the bio banding. The obstensive reason behind it-timing of puberty onset-is very likely just as much determined by genetic constitution as the physiological traits we got to for why it is unfair for women, on average, to compete against men, on average. So do you see bio banding as relating to fairness in who competes against whom? Or is it somehow different because it's getting more granular, more complicated, impacting a different number of athletes?
 
crush said:
I didn't ask mike for the steamy details and it's none of my business Emma. He told his wife he likes to dress up after he got caught with VS on his CC. What works for me is being honest and up front about secrets before getting caught. I don't care what two married people do and play but I think they both should agree. Let's not judge others is my point but look for being honest, open and transparent. Have a great day and get ready for true freedom :) You will be able to be you and that is all one should want. You can be you and I will be me and Mike will be Mike and David and his wife will be what they want. Its the lying that makes people lie more and hide in the darkness. Men love darkness and fear the light and fear their deeds will be exposed. I say expose them and seek help if you need it.
Click to expand...
So many contradictions above.

If you, Mike's wife, and Mike's mom are happy with his explanation and don't want to question it further, that's fine as this situation doesn't affect anyone beyond Mike and his wife.

No judgment or a care in the world about Mike's situation from me Crush.

My mind couldn't help but think logically out loud since you threw that scenario on my computer screen to entertain me.
 
In the end the arguments boil down to this.

One small but vocal side thinks it is OK to discriminate against women by letting men compete against them.

The other side knows that there is a reason we created women's sports, and that it is a travesty to allow men to compete in those women's sports.
 
GoldenGate said:
Actually, you are 100% whiny snowflake. Scared of trans women, scared of teenage girl "bullies", scared of liberals, scared of brown people. We're going to take your sports, your guns, your churches and send you and your family to concentration camps where we make your kids to go trans.
Click to expand...
. . . and lock them in a room that plays Rachel Maddow on a loop.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
. . . and lock them in a room that plays Rachel Maddow on a loop.
Click to expand...
That's what I listen to, to fall asleep at night. Want to torture someone put Joy Behar on loop, just remove the knives from the room. IQ test them after a week and see if they can hit double digits.
 
dad4 said:
Regarding bio banding, parents won’t go for it unless you can explain it.

Birthdays are simple. We understand them. I can look at the birth certificate and tell you their age group. So can anyone. Easy.

Biobands are not simple. You might have one definition for how to measure someone’s developmental age, but other people will want a different definition. Very few of us can figure out our kids adjusted age. Even if we can figure it out, it seems unstable. Do they age up every time they have a growth spurt? Maybe, maybe not.

This is why biobands are useful only for someone like USSoccer or Southhampton. If you need to evaluate 200 kids and the payoff is signing the next Mbappe, biobands can help, and they are worth the trouble. If you need to evaluate 2,000,000 kids and the payoff is slightly fairer rec games, you’re not going to bother.

And, despite what parents want to believe, ECNL and GA have more in common with rec soccer than with Mbappe.
Click to expand...
I agree and wasn't advocating for it, just replying to the comment. Gareth Bale was a poster child for it at Southampton as he developed physically very late, but they factored that in and persisted with him (other academies would probably have dropped him).

I do know of one kid in the DA that bio banded and played down, he's now playing in Germany (low level but still v. young) ... super player too.
 
GoldenGate said:
Actually, you are 100% whiny snowflake. Scared of trans women, scared of teenage girl "bullies", scared of liberals, scared of brown people. We're going to take your sports, your guns, your churches and send you and your family to concentration camps where we make your kids to go trans.
Click to expand...
Your small mind is amazing. I know plenty of liberals and brown people who carry and go to church. Plenty of liberal and brown people who just dig fair competition. But nice job again throwing crap up against the wall to see what drips back down on you.
 
GoldenGate said:
Actually, you are 100% whiny snowflake. Scared of trans women, scared of teenage girl "bullies", scared of liberals, scared of brown people. We're going to take your sports, your guns, your churches and send you and your family to concentration camps where we make your kids to go trans.
Click to expand...
Oddly, you left out the looney he/she pronoun nonsense you want forced upon everyone - you know, ironically the labels you continue to violate yourself.

Shall I provide the post #'s? LOL!
 
EvilGoalie 21 said:
Yeah, this is exactly where I'm going. Parents would not go for it. Pay to play clubs would not go for it. But developmental academies like the idea, for both concepts of development and less altruistic reasons (sounds like an easy way to split an A team from a B team to me). But what if you could have a way to, imperfectly but with a measurable degree of success, sort out some of those traits even earlier? Pre-sort them. Developmental programs with strong financial incentives would probably have a definite interest in that.
Click to expand...
There's a lot of analytics in the big soccer programs these days, but the entry price is that a kid has to have ability. From that point onward they will use anything and everything to develop, manage & measure, but continued development of ability remains the price of entry or price to remain. They only have so many spots and so much patience - Chelsea released/sold Salah, De Bruyn & Lukaku for example.
 
watfly said:
That's what I listen to, to fall asleep at night. Want to torture someone put Joy Behar on loop, just remove the knives from the room. IQ test them after a week and see if they can hit double digits.
Click to expand...
Interesting, given the direction this thread has gone. Your choice of a presumably popular predominantly women's TV show is bound to trigger (not my rules), or maybe not, as there is often selective outrage towards line straddlers and the occasional "good game" butt slappers - entertaining nonetheless.
 
Desert Hound said:
In the end the arguments boil down to this.

One small but vocal side thinks it is OK to discriminate against women by letting men compete against them.

The other side knows that there is a reason we created women's sports, and that it is a travesty to allow men to compete in those women's sports.
Click to expand...

All of you are really going to love the title "Mx." to replace "Mr." and "Ms."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top