Vaccine

You do get it wrong repeatedly, and I show your error every time I find one. That's addressing your content, not your character.

Same with authoritarianism. His content is repeatedly authoritarian...and your content repeatedly loses the thread and you repeatedly do this little nonsensical dance with many have now called you on.
 
Same with authoritarianism. His content is repeatedly authoritarian...and your content repeatedly loses the thread and you repeatedly do this little nonsensical dance with many have now called you on.

No, I don't. Pursuing facts is not a "nonsensical dance".
 
Hahahahahahaha! That's even funnier than the last one.

BTW, I think it's just so darn funny that I've actually gotten a troll into a loop to try and defend and justify his own behavior. This is totally epic dude.

It looks like you have lost the thread. What is wrong with pursuing facts? What is wrong with asking people to clarify their comments? What is wrong with expecting posters to provide the source of their otherwise unsupported conclusions?

A challenge for you -- how many posts can you go without backing into a Magoo ad hominem?
 
It looks like you have lost the thread. What is wrong with pursuing facts? What is wrong with asking people to clarify their comments? What is wrong with expecting posters to provide the source of their otherwise unsupported conclusions?

A challenge for you -- how many posts can you go without backing into a Magoo ad hominem?

Because that's not what you do. If you were really going to do that, you would ask an intelligent question or make an intelligent comment. But what we get from you is the "coocoo" or "nonsense" or the partisan rhetoric or the laziness or just the general getting lost. You are more interested in trolling than getting to any sort of truth.
 
Because that's not what you do. If you were really going to do that, you would ask an intelligent question or make an intelligent comment. But what we get from you is the "coocoo" or "nonsense" or the partisan rhetoric or the laziness or just the general getting lost. You are more interested in trolling than getting to any sort of truth.

That's totally false ad hominems, as expected.
 
That Japanese epidemiologist.

Actually, if you could link this I'd be interested. Maybe you already did, but, you know, there's lots of stuff and I skim most of it quickly. With the new kid on the block we are already seeing people who should know better confusing infectivity with virulence in terms of evolutionary arguments about where Cov-2 is going. Don't know if that is what this is but would like to check it out.
 
Actually, if you could link this I'd be interested. Maybe you already did, but, you know, there's lots of stuff and I skim most of it quickly. With the new kid on the block we are already seeing people who should know better confusing infectivity with virulence in terms of evolutionary arguments about where Cov-2 is going. Don't know if that is what this is but would like to check it out.

A few caveats. The first is Prof. Inoue of the Japanese National Institute of Genetics is the source. The original paper is in Japanese. I don't have the time to give it the half hour - hour it takes to find the summaries (some of them are bad, some of them particularly in the scie journals) are better, but I am very busy which is partially the reason I don't just post it (as I've written before this takes up maybe 10% of my attention while I'm multitasking). I don't book mark things (posting stuff here is I'm kind of like a little kid collecting interesting colored stones in a basket). But I'll send you the video previously posted by PM (don't want to brook espola's laziness and the summary is around minute 10.....Campbell is discussing a bunch of theories for why Japan is acting the way it does and starts with Ivermectin and goes into the defense enzyme which the Japanese may have a higher proportion of....you can do research from there). Again, don't know if it's true or not. Don't really care. I just found it an interesting colored stone.
 
Hahahahahahahah! That's the best one yet! I'm describing what you do! It's seriously the distinction you drew! OMG I'm laughing in tears here.

Your suggestion was that I don't ask intelligent questions. When I do, you run away with "reading comprehension" and "Magoo" and the like. For example, I attempted to have a meaningful discussion on the "run out of mutations" point", even to the extent of reviewing the thread where you claimed the original discussion was. I didn't find it. When I asked for support from you, you called me lazy, despite the fact that I was doing all the heavy lifting in that discussion.

Anybody can read the thread and see your evasions and ad hominems for themselves. You don't have a lot to be proud of there. And now you are cackling as if you scored some point, instead of just running away. There is a social/psychological term for that behavior, but the name of the term escapes me. It's on the line of "false bravado", but that's not exactly the term I'm thinking of.
 
Your suggestion was that I don't ask intelligent questions. When I do, you run away with "reading comprehension" and "Magoo" and the like. For example, I attempted to have a meaningful discussion on the "run out of mutations" point", even to the extent of reviewing the thread where you claimed the original discussion was. I didn't find it. When I asked for support from you, you called me lazy, despite the fact that I was doing all the heavy lifting in that discussion.

Anybody can read the thread and see your evasions and ad hominems for themselves. You don't have a lot to be proud of there. And now you are cackling as if you scored some point, instead of just running away. There is a social/psychological term for that behavior, but the name of the term escapes me. It's on the line of "false bravado", but that's not exactly the term I'm thinking of.

No you didn't. For an example of meaningful discussion, see what evil goalie did. What you did was not that.

Again, I can't help it if you lose the threads or can't fully follow them. What you did is the Magoo Two Step, which is your MO, and I'm not even the one that first called you out with it (kuddos to him....it's very clever).

And there's an easy name which doesn't escape anyone for what you do....we've all seen it...I'm one of a dozen that have called you out on it: troll.
 
I think her ego is overruling her common sense.

Here's the difference between you and I:

-I readily concede my ego is a valid criticism. However, I have something to back it up (several things actually but I'll just, in an attempt to keep my ego in check name one): that I've been more right than the gruesome troll trio + dad 4 throughout this entire thing.

-You have an amazing ego as well (ever notice that you are your own favorite subject?). However, to date, I've seen very little to back it up....instead what we get is reading comprehension issues, short pithy sayings you think are clever or show your debating prowess, the Two Step, general trollish behavior, getting lost and crashing, picking up on weird little threads that lose the main point of the argument, and a general crankiness.
 
A few caveats. The first is Prof. Inoue of the Japanese National Institute of Genetics is the source. The original paper is in Japanese. I don't have the time to give it the half hour - hour it takes to find the summaries (some of them are bad, some of them particularly in the scie journals) are better, but I am very busy which is partially the reason I don't just post it (as I've written before this takes up maybe 10% of my attention while I'm multitasking). I don't book mark things (posting stuff here is I'm kind of like a little kid collecting interesting colored stones in a basket). But I'll send you the video previously posted by PM (don't want to brook espola's laziness and the summary is around minute 10.....Campbell is discussing a bunch of theories for why Japan is acting the way it does and starts with Ivermectin and goes into the defense enzyme which the Japanese may have a higher proportion of....you can do research from there). Again, don't know if it's true or not. Don't really care. I just found it an interesting colored stone.

At last, some intellectual content! That Campbell video, which you haven't mentioned in your previous defense of your coocoo biology, was posted Nov. 23, not last week. Also, nowhere in that video does Campbell discuss running out of mutations, so that is at least one mis-statement you made, adding to your medal count in that category.

I take issue with Campbell's implication that all or almost all of the virus particles inhabiting Japanese victims stumbled into the same self-limiting mutations, ignoring the random nature of genetic mutations that are at the core of molecular genetic evolution. I find more interesting his comments on the APOBEC3A in Asian populations (except perhaps Koreans).

Unless you had some different Campbell video in mind than this one --


which is titled "Ivermectin in Japan".
 
No you didn't. For an example of meaningful discussion, see what evil goalie did. What you did was not that.

Again, I can't help it if you lose the threads or can't fully follow them. What you did is the Magoo Two Step, which is your MO, and I'm not even the one that first called you out with it (kuddos to him....it's very clever).

And there's an easy name which doesn't escape anyone for what you do....we've all seen it...I'm one of a dozen that have called you out on it: troll.

Oops, there's that Magoo thing again. How far did you get - 2 or 3 posts before relapsing?
 
Back
Top