Vaccine

Hey it's experts are articulating it. Wasn't dad4's entire thing to trust the experts? Or do you only trust the experts that agree with you?

I guess we finally know what side of the Galileo argument you fit on.

Which experts said what? Show me.

What is the Galileo argument?
 
It took you a lot of words to get around to it, but you essentially agreed that the right wing media helped cause the low vax rate in right wing areas.

Basic case of decent people being misled by their institutions. Except, in this case, it was the right wing talk show hosts who did the misleading.
Did you ever ask yourself why a "right-wing media" even exists?
 

16 And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden.

17 And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.

 
16 And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden.

17 And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.



God created Adam, then Eve. Adam and Eve had children. Where did the other people come from? Did God create them, or did they do it amongst themselves. If he created them, why doesn't the Bible mention them? Neither answer was satisfactory to the nun, who preferred such questions not be asked.
 
God created Adam, then Eve. Adam and Eve had children. Where did the other people come from? Did God create them, or did they do it amongst themselves. If he created them, why doesn't the Bible mention them? Neither answer was satisfactory to the nun, who preferred such questions not be asked.

It's in the Bible that there were already people in Nod (and possibly other places, if you think about it). Didn't the nun know that? Do you not believe that yourself?
 
And I forgot to ask again what you forgot to answer -- what is the Galileo argument?

you can't figure that one out on your own? Whoosh! You really are going man....while you were never great you were better than this. Condolenscences....it sucks but happens to us all.

In short: you would have been on the side of the church (because it's the establishment) instead of the out of the box thinker Galileo.
 
Again, posted up above at the beginning of last week. I don't brook foolishness or laziness from my kids, what makes you think I will from you.
Galileo made more than one argument. And more than one argument has been made which refers to the Galileo trial.

If you invoke “the Galileo argument” without clearly stating your point, that is laziness on your part, and no one else’s.

For now, I will assume you refer to your ahistorical assertion that Galileo was some kind of unqualified outsider. An ”argument“ that was, and remains, completely detached from the historical facts.
 
It's in the Bible that there were already people in Nod (and possibly other places, if you think about it). Didn't the nun know that? Do you not believe that yourself?

You aren't answering the question. If Adam and Eve were the first humans, where did the people in Nod come from. Again, sad.
 
Galileo made more than one argument. And more than one argument has been made which refers to the Galileo trial.

If you invoke “the Galileo argument” without clearly stating your point, that is laziness on your part, and no one else’s.

For now, I will assume you refer to your ahistorical assertion that Galileo was some kind of unqualified outsider. An ”argument“ that was, and remains, completely detached from the historical facts.

Reading comprehension. The laziness refers to him not looking or following along to the prior articles/study/video.

As to Galileo...it's old ground. I'm shorthanding here because I'm busy (which is a fair critique) but my assumption is that even he would get it.
 
I got kicked out of my second grade Catholic school religion class. We were discussing Genesis 4/5 and Adam and Eve. I raised the question that if Adam and Eve did all that begatting, how did their descendants begat all those children without brother and sister, you know, doing it. Did the Lord just create new humans after Adam and Eve? Or did they really do it amongst themselves? The nun was not amused.
I have to leave for a few. I have some insight that I would love to share with you. Chew on this: Gen 5:1-2 After He created Adam & Eve and got them to eat the apple, he made mankind.
"When God created mankind, he made them in the likeness of God. 2 He created them male and female and blessed them. And he named them “Mankind”[a] when they were created. Basically, I believe God made more adam and Eves after he made the first couple. Adam and Eve were made from the dirt. After God made them, he breathed into them. What did God breath into them? I say a male and female soul but that's just a guess. He breathed two souls and no gender works with me as well sine we dont really know.
 
Your argument is that the virus in Japan ran out of productive mutations, but the virus in other countries did not?

What a fascinating theory. It is bat shit crazy, but fascinating.
People smart enough to know better, like Grace presumably, find ways to tip-toe around blatant insanity (they are fed bs statistics to back their play, of which she trots out ad nauseam), but when it comes right down to it bat-shit crazy doesn’t necessarily always mean stupid. Although sometimes the two do coincide. I’m glad you were able to see it and call it out.
 
Back
Top