I love it that you guys are calling experts in the field bat-shit crazy and insanity. You just proved exactly what I had been beating dad4 with: you only care about experts that agree with you and agree with your priors. You aren't willing to think out of the box (even if such thinking may prove wrong) or critically, which is the opposite of what science really is. You believe in dogma, and I think here and now, you've proven it and what some of us have been saying now for a while.
Vaccine
- Thread starter Multi Sport
- Start date
Oh, I get it. This is why I made a point of clearly stating the damage done by the left wing media’s obsession with the Tuskegee experiement.
But that doesn’t mean I cut either side slack for it. In both cases, it is deliberately slanted reporting to appeal to a poorly informed base. The result is that the base ends up even more poorly informed.
You assume that we believe your summary of what this particular scientist says.
I gave up on your summaries a while ago. The simplest explanation is that the scientist is explaining something interesting, and you just got it wrong again.
Again, don't really care if you believe me or not. You are free to look it up on your own and make a critique. I've already stated I don't have the chops to evaluate what he said, and it's entirely possible the press misunderstood or exaggerating his claims
p.s. it's fun having all 3 of you to play with.
What are you talking about?
Didn't God create everything? Wasn't Nod part of everything?
I won't pretend to read your mind. If you have something to say, just say it.
Hence, my question to the nun: Did God create other humans after Adam and Eve. She didn't like the question. It means Adam and Eve aren't as special as she makes them up She rather not have thought about it.
When we get to the perpetual virginity of Mary, it got even more fun.
It's not a question of reading minds (even dad 4 could follow along despite his reading comprehension issues). It's YOU can't follow along (hence the nickname for you).
So why do you keep responding?
That's the core of your whole position -- you blast out with the ad hominems when you run out of facts.
Because it's fun to troll the troll and mama bear troll in particular is VERY VERY funny. You really did make me out and out belly laugh. Wow...you are just figuring that out?
Again, says the king of ad hominems. Neither you nor Busker nor dad4 is in ANY position to complain about this. Glass houses.
Criticizing your arguments is not an ad hominem response. Lobbing out "reading comprehension" taunts and the like is.
Your first step in the Magoo two step is usually "Coocoo" or "Nonsense". That's no different than a critique of your reading comprehension, which you've repeatedly shown is an issue for you. You just made me laugh again...thank you.
"Coocoo" and "nonsense" are directed at the content, not the poster. "Magoo two step" is an ad hominem.
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha! That is really the funniest thing you've ever written.
What did I get wrong?
We're back to the Magoo Two Step. "What did I get wrong?" is one of my favorite parts. It's a catchy part of the song, the moves are challenging without being overtly confusing, and it isn't too ostentatious in its presentation.
Next you'll be telling me properly describing dad 4 as an authoritarian is an ad hominem but implying I "get it wrong" repeatedly isn't. The gaslighting from you 3 is really incredible, particularly when it comes to ads.
You know perfectly well. I'm not going to draw you a diagram.
You do get it wrong repeatedly, and I show your error every time I find one. That's addressing your content, not your character.