Vaccine

I still come across people who think it's some kind of conspiracy theory to say the vaccines don't "stop the spread."

But the head of the CDC has conceded this, and now (with the evidence too overwhelming to ignore) Dr. Fauci is conceding this, as well as waning effectiveness.

I am shocked at how many people don't realize this, or who blindly accept the propaganda behind the vaccine passport system -- that allowing the vaccinated to interact only with other vaccinated people will "stop the spread."

What other explanation can there be for the chart below other than that the vaccines do not stop the spread? This is Iceland, one of the world's most vaccinated countries, and where restrictions are now being reintroduced. (The orange line tracks vaccination rate.)
NWJ2qao0aTp7LryK_7qNVuiV-gbFdNLSSkBIFGbtxziCS60rUG--9KXkyhy-dnk9pRrcxhuXF5RwdOec5X2nx6dIhw2p2RH0bMaOCC4kiHPbOaSbdGOXV32lW1PuSxxuQdnZREQP1_ZhrVnQIa1WykuTAzTu_r8=s0-d-e1-ft
I'd also like to share this chart, courtesy of a friend:
EepFR-Xz329OOjXUJZ7O2-y48oXt3Nb3hDiByuPWt-0YHKzcwyz4u-homgRkaCJXEnzl7m2dnUzS1tuGu4nzKdEOVpkkKcbkD6891dk7CBEU1tkwDq74EzdxzaQr-2uuVERs0YOX8FoOGoEaEUEsLLWILbVHt9o=s0-d-e1-ft
He writes:

What can we learn from this graph?
- open schools don't drive covid
- full football stadiums don't drive covid
- lack of masking doesn't drive covid
- no vax mandates don't drive covid

What drives these curves?
1) we don’t fully know, 2) to the extent we do, regional seasonality appears to play the biggest role, and 3) possibly constrained by natural immunity.

Nothing new. Just another example of the experts being wrong about everything again.—T. Woods
 
Actually it does not make anything weaker.

What the data shows is that even amongst a population that is about 100% vaxxed, there isn't protection against the spread of the virus.

That is the key takeaway.

You said a month or so ago you and some friends were mad at the unvaxxed because if they only vaxxed up this would all be over soon.

The reality is the virus spreads easily through vaxxed populations. If it didn't, Gibraltar would not have the highest case count they have ever had.
Sure. And your conclusion is valid in any jurisdiction with more than 30 annual tourists per local resident.

It just does not apply to the 99.9% of the world‘s population which doesn’t live in a tourist trap.
 
Conceded what? You brought up a meaningless statistic, and I pointed out that your statistic is meaningless.

That’s kind of all that happened.

Now you’re going to try to make some US/Gibraltar equivalence: “Border crossings are significant there, therefore border crossings are significant here.“.

US has just under one daily border crossing per 330 residents. Gibraltar has almost one daily border crossing per one resident. The impact on them is about 300 times as large as the impact on us. Just because border crossings complicate herd immunity for Gibraltar doesn’t mean border crossings are at all meaninful for herd immunity in the US. It’s literally 300X more important to them than to us. This isn’t even apples to oranges. This is grapes to watermelons.
Dude, you moved the goalpost. You've basically said even if a population is 100% vaxxed, herd immunity isn't possible if there are people coming in from other areas that aren't 100% vaxxed.

You've destroyed your Martha's Vineyard argument (think of the weekend daytrippers there in the summer). You've said San Diego and Texas can't reach herd immunity given the border crossing (which for them is a huge deal than lumping in Missouri's population to say 1 border crossing per 330 residents). You are also saying then for New York City herd immunity is impossible unless the residents of surrounding New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey are fully vaccinated (even though they also are overwhelmingly day commuters just like in Gibraltar).

You are saying that herd immunity is impossible while there is a large motion of people (even if those people don't stay overnight in the location, as in Gibraltar). So we've gone from 70%, to 85% to 90% to 100% to 100%+ everyone in travel distance to get to herd immunity. You may as well say there's no such thing until everyone in the globe is vaccinated because you know what, people travel. Do you ever get tired of pushing those big goals around the field???
 
Dude, you moved the goalpost. You've basically said even if a population is 100% vaxxed, herd immunity isn't possible if there are people coming in from other areas that aren't 100% vaxxed.

You've destroyed your Martha's Vineyard argument (think of the weekend daytrippers there in the summer). You've said San Diego and Texas can't reach herd immunity given the border crossing (which for them is a huge deal than lumping in Missouri's population to say 1 border crossing per 330 residents). You are also saying then for New York City herd immunity is impossible unless the residents of surrounding New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey are fully vaccinated (even though they also are overwhelmingly day commuters just like in Gibraltar).

You are saying that herd immunity is impossible while there is a large motion of people (even if those people don't stay overnight in the location, as in Gibraltar). So we've gone from 70%, to 85% to 90% to 100% to 100%+ everyone in travel distance to get to herd immunity. You may as well say there's no such thing until everyone in the globe is vaccinated because you know what, people travel. Do you ever get tired of pushing those big goals around the field???
I am saying Gibraltar doesn’t count as a “population” for purposes of epidemiology. Too small and too porous.

New York and Texas? Neither one is all that small. If New York City had 8 million daily commuters, or Texas had 20 million daily commuters, then they’d look like Gibraltar and you’d be right. But they don’t, and you’re not.
 
I am saying Gibraltar doesn’t count as a “population” for purposes of epidemiology. Too small and too porous.

New York and Texas? Neither one is all that small. If New York City had 8 million daily commuters, or Texas had 20 million daily commuters, then they’d look like Gibraltar and you’d be right. But they don’t, and you’re not.
The question you are avoiding is why are cases skyrocketing in a population that is about 100% vaxxed?

What does that say about the vaxx?

It tells you breakthrough cases are not rare.
 
The question you are avoiding is why are cases skyrocketing in a population that is about 100% vaxxed?

What does that say about the vaxx?

It tells you breakthrough cases are not rare.
What does it say? Nothing. With millions of visitors and 33K locals, it’s all noise and no signal. Even the vax rate is all noise. A tiny fraction of people getting vaccinated while on holiday would be enough to mess up the counts.

If you want to know whether breakthrough cases are rare, take a look at Watfly’s MN page. SCC also breaks out the vaccinated case rate from the unvax. For SCC, the jab reduces your odds of a positive test by about 82%: from 33.7 per 100K to 6.2 per 100K.


It’s an 80% reduction. I’ll let you worry about whether that counts as “rare” or not.
 
Dude, you moved the goalpost. You've basically said even if a population is 100% vaxxed, herd immunity isn't possible if there are people coming in from other areas that aren't 100% vaxxed.

You've destroyed your Martha's Vineyard argument (think of the weekend daytrippers there in the summer). You've said San Diego and Texas can't reach herd immunity given the border crossing (which for them is a huge deal than lumping in Missouri's population to say 1 border crossing per 330 residents). You are also saying then for New York City herd immunity is impossible unless the residents of surrounding New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey are fully vaccinated (even though they also are overwhelmingly day commuters just like in Gibraltar).

You are saying that herd immunity is impossible while there is a large motion of people (even if those people don't stay overnight in the location, as in Gibraltar). So we've gone from 70%, to 85% to 90% to 100% to 100%+ everyone in travel distance to get to herd immunity. You may as well say there's no such thing until everyone in the globe is vaccinated because you know what, people travel. Do you ever get tired of pushing those big goals around the field???
The herd is nearly 8 billion worldwide.
 
I am saying Gibraltar doesn’t count as a “population” for purposes of epidemiology. Too small and too porous.

New York and Texas? Neither one is all that small. If New York City had 8 million daily commuters, or Texas had 20 million daily commuters, then they’d look like Gibraltar and you’d be right. But they don’t, and you’re not.

It's always something. Whenever you don't like the solution, you always wave it away (like Los Angeles and your preferred solution). How about Singapore (that one's great because they had masks + vaccination)? Iceland? The UK itself? Waive away.
 
Being in the travel biz, I can tell you that the peak season into Gibraltar is over the summer months. Aug being the big month. Note that during Aug cases were declining. Right now it is low season for tourism and yet cases are skyrocketing.
Apparently daily border traffic between Gibraltar & Spain alone is about 10K people, which is a third of the population of Gibraltar. Spain does have very high vaccination rates also mind.

The graph is a bit weird, probably as its scaling per million for a place with a population of 33,000. The vaccination rate is apparently at 120% with the cases at 1500. The maximum cases ever there was 1300 and the current is 475, or 1.4% of the population.
 
Who are they harming? If someone wants to wear a mask inside their car, what business is it of mine?

Might even be rational. As far as I know, It’s a Lyft driver who is in between passengers.
Assuming the situation of others and wanting to decide how they should live their lives is the realm of the presumptuous. You never know what someone else’s experiences have been.
 
It's always something. Whenever you don't like the solution, you always wave it away (like Los Angeles and your preferred solution). How about Singapore (that one's great because they had masks + vaccination)? Iceland? The UK itself? Waive away.
Singapore?

You mean the country that has fewer than 600 covid deaths and a population of almost 6 million people? The country which has fewer than 5% as many covid deaths per capita as the US? The incredibly densely populated country which managed to almost entirely avoid covid mortality? That Singapore?

They wore masks, then got vaccinated, then opened up. They’re already past their delta peak, and still have almost no deaths.

I don’t think you could possibly have chosen a worse example to make a case against vaccines and masks.
 
Who said anything about harming? I said it's irrational - specifically about the risks of COVID which leads directly to the acceptance of irrational mandates. Of the four examples I gave, you selected a special case of one of them. If only you were as critically analytical of real life as you are of lab results.
People do many things they feel will keep them from harm that may be unnecessary, that doesn’t necessarily make them “irrational” does it? I’d list them but that would be redundant.
 
Singapore?

You mean the country that has fewer than 600 covid deaths and a population of almost 6 million people? The country which has fewer than 5% as many covid deaths per capita as the US? The incredibly densely populated country which managed to almost entirely avoid covid mortality? That Singapore?

They wore masks, then got vaccinated, then opened up. They’re already past their delta peak, and still have almost no deaths.

I don’t think you could possibly have chosen a worse example to make a case against vaccines and masks.

Err look at the spike. The spike's duration was the roughly same as every other country including Australia that went through it.
And they've gotten the same plateau as England. Nice try.


p.s. why are you bringing up deaths? You think masks now are a magic talisman against deaths if people fall ill? I think you and I agree that the vaccines are very useful in reducing the death rate. Where we disagree is whether vaccination (whether alone or coupled with masks) is enough to bring cases into herd immunity. Nothing in the Singapore numbers is useful to you making that case. Seriously, at this point you are just sticking your fingers in your ears and just wishing things operate like you wish they do.
 
Back
Top