Blaming a god for the worlds problem and slavery is not good for one's soul. "Blame it on a god." We were all tricked Surf Futbol. WHO invented cancer? Blame it on a god, classic. King James was interesting monster. Have you ever wondered why Constantine put all those 66 letters together in the first place? I was just giving you the words from Yeshua. I love him so much and I love God. The OT, you can use that all the time to make your god a monster and many like you do that all the time. Unfortunately, most of the believers in the times of Timothy were slaves dude. My great great grandpa was a slave in Scotland and got no pay, except housing & food. It was horrible for everyone who were not a part of the British Empire. Today's slave get;s to own a mortgage and must obey the master. No jabs, no job slave....
Trans eligibility rules for girls sports.
- Thread starter dad4
- Start date
Chelsea dad g09
SILVER
You're the last person that should be speaking on hypocrisy.
Bible Lesson for today: "I permit no woman to teach or have authority over men; she is to keep silent." Timothy 2:11
How does that comport with your feelings about equality for women?
Well, there you ago again. First off, who was Paul addressing and why?
BTW, my profiler is almost done with your account Surf Futbol. I will share soon. You and Espola seem to have been raised with the bible shoved down your throats. Bible Parent Thumpers were rough on the kids man. Espola shared all about his forced Christian upbringing and being told he had to go to church camp or else he would go to hell. Sound familiar? We do know what he accomplished at church camp though, he bragged about it on here. I'm here to help you if you want it.
Last edited:
No, you actually haven't because I'm new here. I know why the rest participate... it's called "cancel culture" and, thankfully, it's on life support. I asked why YOU don't respect the notion of fair competition for girls when you know the Lia Thomas' of the world, or more appropriately, Thomas Lia, are males with male DNA and a proven physical advantage. I don't really give a rat's ass what you call me. Campaigning for fair treatment of females in sports doesn't make any one a "transphobe" but you're certainly a femalephobe. To answer your last question, a "trans girl" isn't a girl. It's a male with lipstick and long hair.
Grace, men are men and women are women. It really IS that simple and always has been. There's a reason why no female is dominant in a male sport and males ARE dominant in female sports. It can't be any more simple than that. And WTF is "nonbinary"? Pull your pants down. That's what you are. I understand the "physical condition" that is 100% mental. I understand feeling trapped in a body that shouldn't be your own... but in no way does that give the green light for a male, wearing lipstick and a maxi pad under his balls, to play female sports and not say there's an unfair advantage. That, unlike your post, is succinct and logical.
According to you, all females are terrible soccer players because they aren't as good as a male in duct tape and a skirt.
No, what I didn't do is regurgitate the same thing yet again to you, but I have answered your questions here many times. In fact, if you had actually read what I have posted here, you would have known that I believe that the NCAA swim standards were inadequate to the extent they allowed Ms. Thomas to participate in the first place.
It is clear that you have no intention of having a real conversation. Your lack of empathy, your refusal to treat trans children with dignity and respect, unquestionably makes you transphobic. Look, you can claim I hate women all you want, but the truth is allowing trans participation in kiddie soccer is not a zero sum game that hurts girls. In those incredibly rare instances in which a trans child do participate, it can and should be win win for everyone who isn't a transphobic shitbag. I know that. CIF knows it. ECNL knows it. the NCAA knows it. The USWNT knows it. SCOTUS knows it. Vermont's and Connecticut's version of CIF know it. And so apparently does the state of Minnesota. All of these entities have laid out in great detail and plain language why they believe it is more important to allow trans participation in youth sports than to ban it, but you just refuse to listen. It would be one thing if you were willing to participate in a legitimate discussion but simply weighed your arguments against over the arguments in favor, but you won't. You're just like all the rest of the clowns here. I'm sorry if your daughter isn't good enough to compete with a "male with lipstick and long hair" - as you so transphobically characterize trans children - but that speaks only to her lack of ability and your inability to cope with that.
Enjoy all the lost sleep over your irrational fear that trans girls are ruining our country.
No, most girls in ECNL are excellent soccer players who have no problems competing against or with trans girls. If anything, your underestimating how well cis girls can do playing with and against the incredibly rare trans girl makes you the "femalephobe" or whatever bs you're whining about. Many girls are far superior soccer players to all of the trans girls who have ever played ECNL or GDA when it was around. Given that you're terrified of trans girls, though, I can only assume that your daughter is terrible at soccer, because she would need to be pretty bad to be unable to compete against a trans girl.
Your comment about "duct tape and a skirt" is pretty offensive and transphobic btw.
I have a life. I'm not going to read 50 of your posts. I asked you a simple question and, what's become very apparent, is you would rather regurgitate a novel than answer directly. Ms. Thomas is a male. He spent years on the UPenn teams swimming and losing his ass as a male. Now he put on some lipstick and dominates. He can identify as a female, a squirrel or a can of pork-n-beans, but he's a male. Second, you keep pulling the victim card as if wanting a fair and equitable situation for females is somehow less important than a trans-(insert identity here). Your opinion is that allowing a male, who wants to be a female, isn't unfair. It's nothing more than your opinion. Know that. The rest of us, as we have since the beginning of time, recognize the physical advantages and that's why there are male, female and co-ed leagues. And we know why liberal Minnesota, etc. all pretend a "trans" person's rights are more important than a females. It's the hot topic right now. Again, it's dying a slow death everyday so prepare yourself. Sanity is coming back. Women fought too long and hard to get it. So until then, you're just a femalephobic shitbag. If a male wants to play sports, play in the boy's league. It's that simple and always has been. Trans males are males. Period. End of story. They aren't females and never will be. They can grow their hair out like Thomas Lia, they can tape their balls down and wear mini skirts... but they'll always be male.
No, you don't get to speak for "most girls in ECNL" and what they have a problem with. You don't get to represent them, their opinions or be the voice for those unwilling to speak against it. And stop with "cis"... that's the dumbest term ever created. So if it's "incredibly rare", stop expecting everyone else to accept your bullshit narrative that a male, competing against females in sports, is somehow fair.
And I don't give a shit about what's offensive to you. Why would I or anybody else on this forum? You talk down to everybody. I have read enough of your shit to know that. For the record, I don't fear boys dressed as girls. Nothing is more entertaining than watching a grown man, with facial hair, walking around in a skirt and bow in his hair. LMAO! And I'm not sure how bad all the other NCAA swimmers were that lost to Thomas Lia but I'll bet, given they were NCAA swimmers, they weren't "pretty bad."
That is a bit of an overstatement, since the case addressed only MN state laws. Ultimately, I don't think adult trans women should be allowed to compete in women's powerlifting, but the language of the MN laws are what they are. Maybe they need amending, just like the NCAA swim rules proved to need amending. Regardless, there was one critically important sentence in that decision that separates good people from transphobes, and it is this: "The USAPL's evidence of competitive advantage does not take into account any competitive disadvantage a transgender athlete might face from, for example, increased risk of depression and suicide, lack of access to coaching and practice facilities, or other performance suppression common to transgender persons."
Maybe the competitive disadvantages that a trans athlete faces don't outweigh the advantages in some sports. Furthermore, as competition becomes more important at adult and professional levels, probably the relative importance of some factors need to be weighed differently than as applied to children's sports. For example, the risk of depression and suicide in particular probably become less important as factors as children become adults. But the problem is that too many people are unwilling to even consider those disadvantages AT ALL. IF USAPL had just shown a little empathy and actually evaluated the factors that support trans participation instead of essentially telling trans women to f off, and perhaps made minor accommodations to its policies but had reached the same result about competitions, they probably wouldn't be where they are.
You ok buddy?
It isn't my narrative btw. The only difference between my position and that of CIF, ECNL, the NCAA, the UWSNT, SCOTUS, the state of MN, and Vermont's version of CIF is that I'm less diplomatic with people who are clearly transphobic, but we all believe the exact same thing. I gave you every opportunity to look into their positions on your own, but you refused. I wouldn't be talking down to you if weren't making derogatory comments about people for simply being trans and were actually willing to have a legitimate conversation.
Yeah, quite fine, thanks for asking... buddy. We all know why XYZ... entity supports it for now. But that political correctness garbage is dying because people are getting their voices back. Women are getting their voices back. And I've yet to see you defend your position that males don't have a physical advantage over females. Maybe evolution is too much for you to overcome? Hunters and gatherers.
You aren't diplomatic to anybody... and I never planned to be diplomatic with you. I asked a simple question you refuse to answer. It's okay because I knew you wouldn't. I have no problem with trans people and couldn't care less about what they want, or think they want, to be. Just don't expect everyone else to live in your fantasy world with you. Don't expect everyone else to accommodate you. And don't expect people to accept your unfair advantage in a sport that plays to physical advantage. Trans people aren't special. Unique, but not special.
Women like the USWNT?
Like these women? Over 465 feminist leaders sign open letter standing in solidarity with transgender women and girls, including Gloria Steinem, Regina King, Halle Berry, Selena Gomez, Chelsea Clinton, Gabrielle Union, and more | GLAAD
Like these women? Billie Jean King, Megan Rapinoe, and Candace Parker Join Nearly 200 Athletes Supporting Trans Youth Participation in Sports - Women's Sports Foundation (womenssportsfoundation.org)
Like all the women on SCOTUS?
Shocking... lesbians and celebrities (who need to avoid appearing insensitive or damage their careers) supporting the trans community. How liberal of them.
Simple question. Do me a favor and forgo the novel on this one. Why do you think it's fair to allow males to compete against females in a sport like soccer?
Chelsea dad g09
SILVER
You mean have a legitimate conversation that's in agreement with your opinion. Your hypocrisy reeks worse than your dirty taint. Btw why are you dodging the fact that you insulted overweight girls? Embarrassed by your own words or you stand by them?