Why assume that low revenue implies pay to play?
The overlapping leagues raise costs significantly, for very little benefit. A basic pro/rel system would reduce travel, and travel related costs, with absolutely no harm done to the quality of coaching or play. You’d end up playing the teams near you that have similar records, just like you did back in U8. Far better than spending money on plane tickets to play some weak sauce team you’d never talk to if they didn’t have the badge.
I agree in areas like Texas, California, Florida and others (not trying to leave anyone out), NY/NJ, etc., areas with a population density where there are enough kids to support having multiple good teams in a geography to limit travel is a good thing. Its been nice having a break these past few months.
What these leagues like ECNL provide is the access to coaches, the opportunity to get in front of them. That is why parents pay for the badge, and for their kids to play against other "similarly" skilled kids.
Revenue matters IMHO...Facilities, Uniforms, Equipment, Insurance, Coaching, League Fees, Reserves for Scholarships, etc....Who pays for this? Supporting this this for 12 Teams (6 boys/6 girls) is not cheap. How do you propose this gets paid for?