How’s the 2023-24 season going?

excuses all around! Beach has a great program and great players all around.. perhaps if Sporting’s best player (who is out with an injury)would’ve played then that excuse would have merit. Giving credit to a group of girls who worked really hard during a league game and got the result goes a long way.
I didn’t have sporting losing 0-2 to heat on my bingo card.. I’d ask what happened but no need for excuses. I’ll just give heat their props for winning
 
To
@Carlsbad7 stop fooling yourself GA is in no way closing the gap and the fact that you play GA is your way of validating that then good for you.

To
@Surfer_dad nothing is going on at surf other then they got better when you left the team so the win over Koge must have tasted really bitter.

To
@Luis Andres this guy can disappear he is the typical parent who thinks his player is way better then they really are

all 3 of these people should be embarrassed to show there faces anywhere much less voice any opinions they might have
Mic drop
 
To
@Carlsbad7 stop fooling yourself GA is in no way closing the gap and the fact that you play GA is your way of validating that then good for you.

To
@Surfer_dad nothing is going on at surf other then they got better when you left the team so the win over Koge must have tasted really bitter.

To
@Luis Andres this guy can disappear he is the typical parent who thinks his player is way better then they really are

all 3 of these people should be embarrassed to show there faces anywhere much less voice any opinions they might have
Mic drop
You seem like a nice guy.

Love how you add positive feedback to the discussion.
 
A bit of an upset, but not completely out of the blue - the teams appear to be quite close.

View attachment 18167
This is in the context to half the starting line up being out for Beach and this guy coming in here with liquid courage after beating a wounded opponent saying “excuses”. I don’t even have a kid at Beach but it doesn’t take a genius to understand how team sports work and how a team will perform when half your starting line up is out.

Not sure how they do it at sporting but most NL clubs don’t slide kids back and forth at will between the NL and RL teams. There’s a lot to factor in. That may involve parent / kid preference, giving your bench opportunity and a plethora of other reasons we can consider.

It’s like Slammers NL playing with 13. They’ve got 2 RL teams an E64 and 2 NPL teams they can draw from but they aren’t because of their own reasons. Eagles NL also keeps a small roster too despite having 18 on the RL roster and talent on non RL teams that could slide up.

Just kick it down a notch and be happy you won a game you were supposed to win.
 
It’s like Slammers NL playing with 13. They’ve got 2 RL teams an E64 and 2 NPL teams they can draw from but they aren’t because of their own reasons. Eagles NL also keeps a small roster too despite having 18 on the RL roster and talent on non RL teams that could slide up.

If a club runs more than one ECNL program, they can't draw players from outside the program a particular team is registered in.
 
If a club runs more than one ECNL program, they can't draw players from outside the program a particular team is registered in.
Can you clarify?

To my understanding from the ECNL bylaws, you can add a player to an NL roster so long as the roster does not exceed a total of 30 players in the season. You can absolutely bring an RL player from your own program up to the NL and, if the DOC signs off on it, you can absolutely leave one NL program for another NL program within the same season. These are in the ECNL rules on their website.

I know of 1 player in particular who played for 1 NL team, went to a GA team and then played for another NL team all in the same season (actually within 2 months).

And for within the program of teams with 2 NL teams, I know of handful of RL players were asked if they wanted to move up to NL within slammers last season but declined.

So I don’t understand what you’re trying to imply?
 
It sounds like he's saying that in cases where a large club has 2 NL teams and 2 RL teams, they are linked - and you can't mix and match from either RL to either NL team. So a player on Koge RL can only club-pass to Koge NL, not Slammers NL. But is there a situation out there with a single club (that isn't just affiliated or partnered with) that has 2 NL teams?

Or maybe he's saying that the E64 and NPL players are off-limits to club-passes if the club is running multiple ECNL or ECNL-R programs. I dunno.
 
It sounds like he's saying that in cases where a large club has 2 NL teams and 2 RL teams, they are linked - and you can't mix and match from either RL to either NL team. So a player on Koge RL can only club-pass to Koge NL, not Slammers NL. But is there a situation out there with a single club (that isn't just affiliated or partnered with) that has 2 NL teams?

Or maybe he's saying that the E64 and NPL players are off-limits to club-passes if the club is running multiple ECNL or ECNL-R programs. I dunno.
Ya that’s what I’m trying to figure out as well. But even in the case where you have a koge player and a slammers player, I would expect that those two could move rosters (not player pass) so long as those DOCs approve it
 
Yes - they could always move rosters if the DOCs approve it, but it doesn't just become OK because they say so, the player needs to get a new player card assigning them to the new club/team. And then they need to get another new player card if they want to switch back. Whether it's intentional or unintentional, the player card requirements make it cumbersome to switch between clubs within season. Club passes and/or guesting from a completely different organization with no player card conflict are both always going to be easier to manage. (Which is why I didn't understand the limitation or problem with E64/NPL)
 
Yes - they could always move rosters if the DOCs approve it, but it doesn't just become OK because they say so, the player needs to get a new player card assigning them to the new club/team. And then they need to get another new player card if they want to switch back. Whether it's intentional or unintentional, the player card requirements make it cumbersome to switch between clubs within season. Club passes and/or guesting from a completely different organization with no player card conflict are both always going to be easier to manage. (Which is why I didn't understand the limitation or problem with E64/NPL)
Agree with everything said, but my understanding going from RL to NL isn’t hard to do within the same DBA (ie Koge to koge and slammers to slammers). And to the point, if push came to shove and they wanted bring a koge RL to a slammers NL and move rosters, it can still happen, although there’s administrative work to be done (time and money involved), but to say they “can’t” I don’t understand. It may not be practical but it’s possible.

I know a Legends player who plays with 09 RL, 10NL and 10RL and that may change on any given match day (on a day to day basis).

Last season slammers RL played against many NL players who came down to help out that day too.
 
Agree with everything said, but my understanding going from RL to NL isn’t hard to do within the same DBA (ie Koge to koge and slammers to slammers).
I know a Legends player who plays with 09 RL, 10NL and 10RL and that may change on any given match day (on a day to day basis).

Last season slammers RL played against many NL players who came down to help out that day too.

Understood and agreed. I would have thought a club pass would allow all of this to happen pretty commonly and easily.
 
Can you clarify?

To my understanding from the ECNL bylaws, you can add a player to an NL roster so long as the roster does not exceed a total of 30 players in the season. You can absolutely bring an RL player from your own program up to the NL and, if the DOC signs off on it, you can absolutely leave one NL program for another NL program within the same season. These are in the ECNL rules on their website.

I know of 1 player in particular who played for 1 NL team, went to a GA team and then played for another NL team all in the same season (actually within 2 months).

And for within the program of teams with 2 NL teams, I know of handful of RL players were asked if they wanted to move up to NL within slammers last season but declined.

So I don’t understand what you’re trying to imply?

Simply pointing out that players can't move seemlessly between teams in two separate programs operated by the same club.

Any player registered on any team within a program can play on any age appropriate team within that same program, as long as they only play on one team per day.

Section 2.2.3 of the ECNL Competition Rules touches on multiple program movement, sections 3.14.3 and 3.14.3.1 make it clear that movement between programs is limited.
 
Back
Top