Bad News Thread

Private biz already does look at your medical information. Have you ever purchased life insurance?

You can refuse to tell them your medical information. And they can refuse to insure you at that price.

When I was 23 and in the Navy they just signed me up without even asking any health questions. When I was near 50, they made me fill out a health history questionnaire and sent a nurse to the house to check my vitals and draw some blood (and I was accepted).
 
Private biz already does look at your medical information. Have you ever purchased life insurance?

You can refuse to tell them your medical information. And they can refuse to insure you at that price.
This post says it ALL…..give up people. It’s useless!
 
Conceptually yes. And I believe that adult vaccination status should be private. However, the legal consensus seems to be that a business can ask an employee or customer their vaccination status and not violate HIPAA. However, to ask them why they aren't vaccinated would be a violation....based upon what I've read, which may, or may not be correct.

IMO, its in incredibly poor taste for an employer to ask someone's vaccination status. I also think its terrible business decision, both short term and long term.

"Poor taste"?

"I see dead people" -- (sorry, I couldn't find a 10-second video clip of that)
 
You are using a false dichotomy. Trust is not boolean.

I trust the vaccine to do what they tested it to do: be 95% effective at preventing serious illness.
I do not trust the vaccine to completely block transmission in a very high risk environment like a cruise ship.

So, do I trust the vaccine or not?

There is nothing logically inconsistent with using both vaccines and tests.
“Do you still beat your wife?”
 
I don't get where all the emotion comes from about vaccine passports. Am I the only one old enough to remember the yellow vaccine cards that were required for entry (or even visa applications) to much of the world? Aren't kids still required to show proof of up-to-date immunizations in order to attend public schools?

They are conditioned to react that way. Like with other code words and phrases they can’t explain they just know how they are supposed to react in their world. Ask one about critical race theory and behold the nonsense.
 
"Poor taste"?

"I see dead people" -- (sorry, I couldn't find a 10-second video clip of that)
Maybe poor taste is the wrong word. Let me just put it to you this way. I don't what to start my customer relationship with "Can I see your vaccine card?" Your immediately questioning the trust you have in that individual.

It's a virus with very low risk. For the 100th time if you're uncomfortable with that risk, stay home. Catering to the lowest common denominator gets us nowhere.
 
I don't get the connection.

Bayesian statistics provides the logical basis for stereotyping.

It lets you take one direction of data (percent of group X with behavior Y) and flip it. (probability that specific act Y was the result of something from group X)

It’s completely mathematically valid. If you apply it to an assembly line, it tells you that the widget from group X might be defective, and need to be replaced.

No problem so far. Now replace the word “assembly line” with “neighborhood” and “widget” with “person”. Ugly. Who wants to live in that kind of world?
 
Locked in cabins? Says who?

I can easily imagine a cruise with vaccinated passengers who all got tested before boarding.

You're still stuck in a boolean model. The world is not always zero or one. Usually, it is in between. Take some stats. Embrace the probability distribution. Learn the difference between p= 10^-3 and p=10^-6.

Just don't go Bayesian with it. They call you racist if you go Bayesian.
They did test everyone before boarding. Yet 2 people during the cruise came out positive. Not sure why. I think it may be because they rapid tested people before boarding and then tested them on board afterwards. It's very confusing, but the way they did it at least clearly didn't work because now not only the couple but several others have to quarantine on a completely vaccinated ship.
 
Maybe poor taste is the wrong word. Let me just put it to you this way. I don't what to start my customer relationship with "Can I see your vaccine card?" Your immediately questioning the trust you have in that individual.

It's a virus with very low risk. For the 100th time if you're uncomfortable with that risk, stay home. Catering to the lowest common denominator gets us nowhere.
And, for the 100th time, me staying home doesn’t help. It has nothing to do with my personal risk.

What I want is the overall case load to keep dropping and eventually stay near zero. Having the masked, vaccinated crowd stay home does not help achieve that goal.

My objection is to the unmasked, unvaccinated crowd acting as vaccine incubators, and continually raising the risk for everyone else.
 
And, for the 100th time, me staying home doesn’t help. It has nothing to do with my personal risk.

What I want is the overall case load to keep dropping and eventually stay near zero. Having the masked, vaccinated crowd stay home does not help achieve that goal.

My objection is to the unmasked, unvaccinated crowd acting as vaccine incubators, and continually raising the risk for everyone else.
It may never be zero (at least not for years). We can’t even get polio to zero and have had periodic measles outbreaks (despite having a very good vaccine against a very stable virus). As I mentioned before rsv kills hundreds of children and thousands of elderly each year and we don’t go into a panic over rsv shutting down the day cares to prevent the elderly from dying...if anything we encourage kids to get it early so their immune systems become primed against it since complications tend to occur in infants and more grown children. And we know the coronavirus is mutating...life tends to find a way...and the delta variant is pretty close to breaking through...a few more years of this we will eventually get a cases (but not necessarily deaths) breakthrough. And we suspect if they did do enhancements to the virus that it may be primed to do exactly that: adapt to humans until it achieved an ultimate outcome (which for viruses means survival And replication....not necessarily killing the hosts)
 
People being people.....such people who don't trust the vaccine and want their fellow travellers quarantined if they test positive will be happy until they find they were at the dinner table with said people and now have to wait 3 days locked in their cabins until they can be tested.

I have looked, but I can't find any evidence that other people on the ship were locked in their cabins for three days, or any time at all, for that matter. Where did you get this?
 
And, for the 100th time, me staying home doesn’t help. It has nothing to do with my personal risk.

What I want is the overall case load to keep dropping and eventually stay near zero. Having the masked, vaccinated crowd stay home does not help achieve that goal.

My objection is to the unmasked, unvaccinated crowd acting as vaccine incubators, and continually raising the risk for everyone else.

Also genuinely curious....assume it doesn't go away anytime soon....where do you think is the acceptable level before life completely returns to normal: a bad flu season (which is where at current vaccination levels and current variants we are currently at), an average flu season, an RSV epidemic, the common cold (which kills thousands of elderly every year), adenovirus outbreak (man my entire family came down with that one when the kids were in day care....2 days into a family reunion trip to Hawaii....almost everyone in the family including uncles and aunts came down with it....digestive problems, fever, conjunctivitis, ear infections...fortunately at the time there weren't any severely elderly in our family and there are only a handful of children in the family [which interestingly none but mine came down with it]), measles, never?
 
I have looked, but I can't find any evidence that other people on the ship were locked in their cabins for three days, or any time at all, for that matter. Where did you get this?

The news just broke last night. The AP said they were contact tracing and appropriate steps would be taken to isolate those exposed. I've been waiting for the update but haven't found exactly what they decided to do yet (who, if any one, they will isolate and how long)...seems like this took them by surprise and are still waiting to hear re guidance from authorities and the cruise line. There's a reporter from the Times on the cruise live tweeting on it, but she has nothing on it yet.

It's all very strange. Why not, if you are going to insist on both, have them present a test within 48 hours before boarding and rapid test them when they get on....why was there testing done at the boarding site, when you know a positive result could come back 24 hours later. Or did the couple get tested on ship for some reason? Odd. The reporting isn't clear.

Oh but the positive couple have been definitely put in an isolation cabin according to the Times reporter from this am. She doesn't say for how long.
 
Also genuinely curious....assume it doesn't go away anytime soon....where do you think is the acceptable level before life completely returns to normal: a bad flu season (which is where at current vaccination levels and current variants we are currently at), an average flu season, an RSV epidemic, the common cold (which kills thousands of elderly every year), adenovirus outbreak (man my entire family came down with that one when the kids were in day care....2 days into a family reunion trip to Hawaii....almost everyone in the family including uncles and aunts came down with it....digestive problems, fever, conjunctivitis, ear infections...fortunately at the time there weren't any severely elderly in our family and there are only a handful of children in the family [which interestingly none but mine came down with it]), measles, never?
p.s. my parents also never came down with it...we believe probably because they were exposed to the adenovirus when younger, since they both worked in hospital, including military hospital, settings for so long. But the rest of us middle agers, including the pediatrician....man oh man that was awful.
 
Oh but the positive couple have been definitely put in an isolation cabin according to the Times reporter from this am. She doesn't say for how long.
What? Wait? They only quarantined the infected people? How does that work? Is this some new technique? Why wouldn't they quarantine the healthy people?
 
It may never be zero (at least not for years). We can’t even get polio to zero and have had periodic measles outbreaks (despite having a very good vaccine against a very stable virus). As I mentioned before rsv kills hundreds of children and thousands of elderly each year and we don’t go into a panic over rsv shutting down the day cares to prevent the elderly from dying...if anything we encourage kids to get it early so their immune systems become primed against it since complications tend to occur in infants and more grown children. And we know the coronavirus is mutating...life tends to find a way...and the delta variant is pretty close to breaking through...a few more years of this we will eventually get a cases (but not necessarily deaths) breakthrough. And we suspect if they did do enhancements to the virus that it may be primed to do exactly that: adapt to humans until it achieved an ultimate outcome (which for viruses means survival And replication....not necessarily killing the hosts)
Polio? So far, most of team virus seems more concerned with helping ‘rona than with helping polio.

If we ever get a subgroup of people who refuse the polio vaccine and insist on dumping raw sewage into the bay near oyster fisheries, I will object to that, too.

Perhaps hound will step up to defend their “freedom”.
 
Bayesian statistics provides the logical basis for stereotyping.

It lets you take one direction of data (percent of group X with behavior Y) and flip it. (probability that specific act Y was the result of something from group X)

It’s completely mathematically valid. If you apply it to an assembly line, it tells you that the widget from group X might be defective, and need to be replaced.

No problem so far. Now replace the word “assembly line” with “neighborhood” and “widget” with “person”. Ugly. Who wants to live in that kind of world?

Bayesian analysis may show you the likelihood of failure of widgets from assembly line X, but it won't show you which ones will fail.
 
Polio? So far, most of team virus seems more concerned with helping ‘rona than with helping polio.

If we ever get a subgroup of people who refuse the polio vaccine and insist on dumping raw sewage into the bay near oyster fisheries, I will object to that, too.
...becaus
Perhaps hound will step up to defend their “freedom”.

We do get a subgroup that refuses the polio vaccine. It's how we got the California measles outbreak a few years back...because of parents refusing the vaccines for their kids....so you are going with ducking the uncomfortable question you don't want to think about?
 
Back
Top