Agree it is complicated, but we know most of the factors by now. You have to pay attention to masks, weather, daylight hours, staying outside, indoor gathering, indoor dining, pop density, vaccine distribution, median age, housing patterns, and mobility. You only get bad results when you try to look at one factor while excluding the others.
With respect to “very robust” lockdowns, I am not sure we agree what those words mean, or whether it counts as draconian.
I have no problem with very large fines for indoor gatherings. 1% of income plus 0.1% of assets would be enough to make most people move outside. To you, it probably sounds like Stasi are kicking in the door.
If that fine sounds high, remember that the current system has resulted in around a half million deaths and ten million unemployed. A few $5000 fines sounds not so bad in that context.