Vaccine
- Thread starter Multi Sport
- Start date
Happened again
SILVER ELITE
Pretty much sums up Pfizer and company's trials efforts. thanks for this, you nailed it...and you didn't even know it.
So sad. Seemed like a cool and funny guy. My heart goes out to everyone who got played and lied to about this BS.
www.bitchute.com
Muscleman Jo Lindner [10 Million+ Followers] Dies After Post-Vaccine Clotting & Heavy Metal Tox
Want more videos? Join https://GroupDiscover.com to find the best videos from across the free speech internet platforms like Odysee, Rumble, Bitchute & More all in one huge video repository. Add me on these great platforms: https://rokfin.com/timtruth https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/...
www.bitchute.com
14 Professional soccer players died suddenly in the past 6 months - 5 dead in the month of June 2023!
DR. WILLIAM MAKIS MD
COVID-19 mRNA vaccine booster uptake is almost down to zero, yet the sudden deaths of athletes continue at a rapid pace.
We may now be used to the sudden deaths of soccer players, having watched them collapse on a regular basis since the rollout of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, however, they are still dying at what appears to be an increasing frequency.
DR. WILLIAM MAKIS MD
COVID-19 mRNA vaccine booster uptake is almost down to zero, yet the sudden deaths of athletes continue at a rapid pace.
We may now be used to the sudden deaths of soccer players, having watched them collapse on a regular basis since the rollout of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, however, they are still dying at what appears to be an increasing frequency.
kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
Has anyone done more damage to science than Anthony Fauci? I'm open to suggestions.
<Part 1>
Covidgate - How a group of scientists and government officials tricked the public.
Roger Pielke Jr.
July 2
On July 11, 2023 the U.S. House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic will hold a hearing titled, Investigating the Proximal Origin of a Cover Up. The cover-up being referred to was put into place by a small group of scientists at the request of U.S. government officials to quash any public discussion of the possibility that COVID-19 resulted from a research-related incident — known colloquially as a lab leak.
The cover-up is well known and well documented by those who closely follow this issue This post provides an overview for those who may not be as familiar with the cover-up.
Before diving in, let me state the obvious — this is a big effing deal, as Joe Biden might say. Scientists and government officials conspired — yes, conspired — to mislead the public by knowingly promoting misinformation in the guise of a peer-reviewed paper in a major journal. Given the stakes, this is a scientific scandal with huge significance.
This cover-up, which I’ll call Covidgate, is independent of the ultimate answer to the question of whether Covid-19 had only natural origins or was associated with a research-related incident. Currently, the U.S. intelligence community has determined, “All agencies assess that two hypotheses are plausible: natural exposure to an infected animal and a laboratory-associated incident.”
The cover-up was designed to render the possibility of a “laboratory-based scenario” off limits for public discussion or investigation. The cover-up was wildly successful in stopping further public discussion of a lab leak for several years, until information about the cover-up started to become public. In fact, perhaps the cover-up was too successful, which may explain why the scientists and government officials are now under such scrutiny.
Covidgate centers on a research paper — The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 — which concludes:
Let’s dive in.
Last January, The Nation and The Intercept released emails between Anthony Fauci — who was then director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and member of President Trump’s Coronavirus Task Force — and Jeremy Farrar, the director of the Wellcome Trust, a large British biomedical Foundation. The emails span January to July 2020, as Covid-19 was spreading around the world and the seriousness of the pandemic was becoming undeniable.
The emails tell a story of the origins of the “Proximal Origins” paper. On February 1, 2020 Fauci emails Farrar to tell him that he,
The conversation between Andersen and Fauci was entirely appropriate. This is exactly the sort of responsible action that we should expect from a scientist. Following the call, Fauci immediately raised with Farrar the possibility of going to the FBI and MI5 with the concern about a lab leak.
Fauci asked Farrar to organize a conference call to discuss the matter. List below are who was on the call (I’ve highlighted the four authors of the Proximal Origins paper that would result from the call):
From the emails, we know that the focus of the call was on the possibility that Covid-19 was engineered. Afterwards, here is how Ron Foucher characterized the call (emphasis added):
The House Select Committee has documented that multiple people on the call, in addition to Andersen, viewed a research-related incident as the cause of the pandemic to be possible and plausible — including all of the authors of the Proximal Origins paper.
On February 8, 2020 Holmes characterized the choice they faced as follows:
<Part 1>
Covidgate - How a group of scientists and government officials tricked the public.
Roger Pielke Jr.
July 2
On July 11, 2023 the U.S. House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic will hold a hearing titled, Investigating the Proximal Origin of a Cover Up. The cover-up being referred to was put into place by a small group of scientists at the request of U.S. government officials to quash any public discussion of the possibility that COVID-19 resulted from a research-related incident — known colloquially as a lab leak.
The cover-up is well known and well documented by those who closely follow this issue This post provides an overview for those who may not be as familiar with the cover-up.
Before diving in, let me state the obvious — this is a big effing deal, as Joe Biden might say. Scientists and government officials conspired — yes, conspired — to mislead the public by knowingly promoting misinformation in the guise of a peer-reviewed paper in a major journal. Given the stakes, this is a scientific scandal with huge significance.
This cover-up, which I’ll call Covidgate, is independent of the ultimate answer to the question of whether Covid-19 had only natural origins or was associated with a research-related incident. Currently, the U.S. intelligence community has determined, “All agencies assess that two hypotheses are plausible: natural exposure to an infected animal and a laboratory-associated incident.”
The cover-up was designed to render the possibility of a “laboratory-based scenario” off limits for public discussion or investigation. The cover-up was wildly successful in stopping further public discussion of a lab leak for several years, until information about the cover-up started to become public. In fact, perhaps the cover-up was too successful, which may explain why the scientists and government officials are now under such scrutiny.
Covidgate centers on a research paper — The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 — which concludes:
This conclusion, as I’ll show below, is not what the authors of the paper actually believed when they wrote it, as revealed in various Freedom of Information Act disclosures. The scientists worked to shape a misleading public narrative via the scientific literature at the request of government officials, who then promoted the misleading narrative from the White House. Like I said, a big effing deal.
Let’s dive in.
Last January, The Nation and The Intercept released emails between Anthony Fauci — who was then director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and member of President Trump’s Coronavirus Task Force — and Jeremy Farrar, the director of the Wellcome Trust, a large British biomedical Foundation. The emails span January to July 2020, as Covid-19 was spreading around the world and the seriousness of the pandemic was becoming undeniable.
The emails tell a story of the origins of the “Proximal Origins” paper. On February 1, 2020 Fauci emails Farrar to tell him that he,
Andersen, professor in the Department of Immunology and Microbiology at the Scripps Research Institute, called Fauci to express concern that Covid-19 showed signs of being engineered.
The conversation between Andersen and Fauci was entirely appropriate. This is exactly the sort of responsible action that we should expect from a scientist. Following the call, Fauci immediately raised with Farrar the possibility of going to the FBI and MI5 with the concern about a lab leak.
Fauci asked Farrar to organize a conference call to discuss the matter. List below are who was on the call (I’ve highlighted the four authors of the Proximal Origins paper that would result from the call):
- Kristian Anderson
- Bob Garry
- Christian Drosten
- Tony Fauci
- Mike Ferguson
- Ron Foucher
- Eddie Holmes
- Marion Koopmans
- Stefan Pohimann
- Andrew Rambaut
- Paul Schreier
- Patrick Vallance
- Frances Collins
From the emails, we know that the focus of the call was on the possibility that Covid-19 was engineered. Afterwards, here is how Ron Foucher characterized the call (emphasis added):
His two points were that it was possible that Covid-19 was engineered and they should not discuss it further because it would harm science.
The House Select Committee has documented that multiple people on the call, in addition to Andersen, viewed a research-related incident as the cause of the pandemic to be possible and plausible — including all of the authors of the Proximal Origins paper.
- On February 2, 2020, Dr. Robert Garry similarly wrote, “I really can’t think of a plausible natural scenario . . . . I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature . . . . Of course, in the lab it would be easy . . . .”
- On February 2, 2020, Dr. Michael Farzan wrote he was “bothered by the furin site and ha[d] a hard time explain[ing] that as an event outside the lab . . . . I am 70:30 or 60:40 [lab].”
- On February 2, 2020, Dr. Andrew Rambaut stated, “From a (natural) evolutionary point of view the only thing here that strikes me as unusual is the furin cleavage site.”
- On February 4, 2020, Dr. Edward Holmes indicated that he was “60-40 lab . . . .”
- On February 4, 2020, Dr. Jeremy Farrar wrote, “I am 50-50 [lab]”
On February 8, 2020 Holmes characterized the choice they faced as follows:
In a response the following day, Christian Drosten says that the choice had already been made:
kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
<Part 2>
On February 8, 2020 Andersen made a case for continuing to consider a lab leak as a possibility, and doing so out in public (italics in the original, bold emphasis added by me):
Proximal Origins was published on March 17, 2020. It was one of the most-cited and discussed papers of 2020 and was the basis for labeling any discussion of a research-related incident as a crack-pot conspiracy theory. The paper was wildly successful in achieving the goal articulated in private by its authors — to shut down further discussion and debate on the possibility of a lab leak.
One month after Proximal Origins was published, President Trump was asked at a White House press conference about the possibility of a lab leak, and he turned to Fauci:
Stealth advocacy. Shadow science advice. Misinformation. Propaganda. Covidgate.
Postscript. In March, 2023, Fauci told the New York Times that he was not sure he’d ever read Proximal Origins.
On February 8, 2020 Andersen made a case for continuing to consider a lab leak as a possibility, and doing so out in public (italics in the original, bold emphasis added by me):
We now know that Andersen’s views were not reflected in the published version of Proximal Origins, in fact, exactly the opposite.
Proximal Origins was published on March 17, 2020. It was one of the most-cited and discussed papers of 2020 and was the basis for labeling any discussion of a research-related incident as a crack-pot conspiracy theory. The paper was wildly successful in achieving the goal articulated in private by its authors — to shut down further discussion and debate on the possibility of a lab leak.
One month after Proximal Origins was published, President Trump was asked at a White House press conference about the possibility of a lab leak, and he turned to Fauci:
The paper that Fauci couldn’t quite remember was Proximal Origins. Frances Collins also promoted Proximal Origins after it came out, and like Fauci, making no mention of his role in bringing it into existence:
In sum, a group of scientists, “prompted” by government officials and “shepherded” by Farrar (not listed among the authors), chose to misrepresent in a “scientific” article published in a major journal what they knew and believed, as expressed in private emails. Farrar not only shepherded the paper but also contacted Nature to pressure the journal to publish it. One stated purpose of the misrepresentation was to protect “science” from the scrutiny that might result from serious consideration of a lab leak possibility.
Stealth advocacy. Shadow science advice. Misinformation. Propaganda. Covidgate.
Postscript. In March, 2023, Fauci told the New York Times that he was not sure he’d ever read Proximal Origins.
Seems that being peer-reviewed, or scientific consensus, is virtually worthless when the academic/scientific world circles the wagons to protect its own interests.
Three years later and they still have not discovered the zoonotic source in a population of animals. With SARS they were at least able to trace it to the Civet. Without an intermediate host identified and with incredibly coincidental evidence and China's behavior, its hard to believe its anything but a lab leak.
kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
You KNOW we have to wait for the kindergarten teacher to determine gender! I can't believe you said that! I'm literally shaking right now.