baldref
GOLD
much more valid than the govt and big pharma telling you.How could I have missed that? Popularity is obviously a valid requirement for a vaccine.
much more valid than the govt and big pharma telling you.How could I have missed that? Popularity is obviously a valid requirement for a vaccine.
It's unpopular because its not very effective. Our country can't agree on anything, but 83% agree that the booster isn't worthwhile for them. The HPV vaccine, which is highly effective, but not mandatory, has a vaccination rate of 60% (for eligible ages).How could I have missed that? Popularity is obviously a valid requirement for a vaccine.
It's "unpopular" for several reasons. One is that the disease has waned (for the moment) at least partially due to the effectiveness of the earlier versions of the vaccine. Another obvious reason is the disinformation plague we have all witnessed, giving many people reasons to avoid the boosters that have no basis in fact.It's unpopular because its not very effective. Our country can't agree on anything, but 83% agree that the booster isn't worthwhile for them. The HPV vaccine, which is highly effective, but not mandatory, has a vaccination rate of 60% (for eligible ages).
Of course, it's your typical "coy, avoid the substance" response.
Funny, because the biggest surge (by a longshot) was the wave that occurred post-vaccination. That doesn't have anything to do with popularity, but has everything to do with actual results. You stick with your appeal to authority over actual results, if that's what works for you.It's "unpopular" for several reasons. One is that the disease has waned (for the moment) at least partially due to the effectiveness of the earlier versions of the vaccine. Another obvious reason is the disinformation plague we have all witnessed, giving many people reasons to avoid the boosters that have no basis in fact.
But if you really decide to pursue "popularity" as a valid measure of the validity of a vaccine or its boosters, perhaps you could prepare a carefully-researched paper for publication.
Death rate among the young is through the roof Expola and has not waned. It's just reported on the news now, that when a young person dies, they die suddenly. When this BS was put on us in 2020, young motorcycle rider is hit by bus head on were counted as Covid deaths because test said so. Why test someone already dead? Has anyone played, "Triple Pay Bonus?" Life insurance company in Indiana saw 29% jump on deaths for the young.It's "unpopular" for several reasons. One is that the disease has waned (for the moment) at least partially due to the effectiveness of the earlier versions of the vaccine. Another obvious reason is the disinformation plague we have all witnessed, giving many people reasons to avoid the boosters that have no basis in fact.
But if you really decide to pursue "popularity" as a valid measure of the validity of a vaccine or its boosters, perhaps you could prepare a carefully-researched paper for publication.
^^^This^^^Not to burst your bubble, but Covid hasn't waned, it just went on a vacation and its back now.
Tell that to the half-million dead Americans. I am waiting for the day when those responsible for spreading the anti-vax crap, even in small ways, are held accountable.Funny, because the biggest surge (by a longshot) was the wave that occurred post-vaccination. That doesn't have anything to do with popularity, but has everything to do with actual results. You stick with your appeal to authority over actual results, if that's what works for you.
Not to burst your bubble, but Covid hasn't waned, it just went on a vacation and its back now. We are living and surviving just fine with Covid...like we should have done in the first place.
I'm waiting for the day when those that were responsible for closing schools, blocking non-covid medical care and fired people for not getting vaccinated, fry in hell. It can't come soon enough.Tell that to the half-million dead Americans. I am waiting for the day when those responsible for spreading the anti-vax crap, even in small ways, are held accountable.
That is simply false.One is that the disease has waned (for the moment) at least partially due to the effectiveness of the earlier versions of the vaccine. Another obvious reason is the disinformation plague we have all witnessed, giving many people reasons to avoid the boosters that have no basis in fact.
q.e.d.That is simply false.
The later variants of covid have been much milder vs the orginal variant. That isnt due to the vax amigo.
People are avoiding boosters because...
-We know the vax doesnt prevent infection or spread
-We know the vast majority of people have little to no risk
-People dont want to take booster after booster after booster...
-We are seeing adverse events due to the vax.
So when you add it all up....most people rightly think why bother?
There is no reason for a healthy person to get a booster. There are a number of reasons why Espola should get a booster.That is simply false.
The later variants of covid have been much milder vs the orginal variant. That isnt due to the vax amigo.
People are avoiding boosters because...
-We know the vax doesnt prevent infection or spread
-We know the vast majority of people have little to no risk
-People dont want to take booster after booster after booster...
-We are seeing adverse events due to the vax.
So when you add it all up....most people rightly think why bother?
There is no reason for a healthy person to get a booster. There are a number of reasons why Espola should get a booster.
Espola is a believe what you're told type of guy. That's why a common response he has to others is "Who told you that?" Meanwhile, the other 83% rely on actual evidence and their own experiences. He needs someone else to interpret that for him.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^***There is no reason for a healthy person to get a booster.***
I was thinking efficacy would be a valid requirement...but oops, who really needs treatment that works. healthy people are better off rubbing dirt on it.How could I have missed that? Popularity is obviously a valid requirement for a vaccine.
based on the fact that healthy people shouldn't have been vaccinated in the first place. It's like wearing a diaper when you've been potty trained for years.What do you base that on? Have you actually interviewed the "other 83%"?
I'll take that as a "no".based on the fact that healthy people shouldn't have been vaccinated in the first place. It's like wearing a diaper when you've been potty trained for years.
I'll take that as a "no".
I'd say you're better off taking it as a, "we're not tolerating your bullshit agenda a 2nd time" if accuracy counts, Fudd.