Vaccine

dad4 said:
If you ever wonder how Trumpies get elected, that's it right there.

I ask you to define one of the most common words in the English language, and you reply with a survey of research papers.

You guys might as well wear t-shirts that say "Out of Touch."
Click to expand...
Where did you ask?
 
dad4 said:
If you ever wonder how Trumpies get elected, that's it right there.

I ask you to define one of the most common words in the English language, and you reply with a survey of research papers.

You guys might as well wear t-shirts that say "Out of Touch."
Click to expand...
Your inability to use information is possibly more of an indictment on our society in general or is it due to something you have been exposed to that dulled your cognitive functions? I am highly undereducated but still I am able to understand simple concepts such as a variation in chromosome make up from one individual to the next. I don’t want men competing against women either but it is obvious there is far more to understand here than, “Me Dick she Jane”
 
what-happened said:
Did you read the study?
Click to expand...
The Auckland report? If that’s what you are calling a “study” (seemingly miss using the term in attempted subterfuge?) I don’t think that report says what you think it does . . . but as you are maintaining a cloak of secrecy as to what your opinion is on it or from where you even derived the information to base that on it may just remain a mystery on both counts.
If you can’t just have an honest discussion you simply are as Grace might say, a troll.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Your inability to use information is possibly more of an indictment on our society in general or is it due to something you have been exposed to that dulled your cognitive functions? I am highly undereducated but still I am able to understand simple concepts such as a variation in chromosome make up from one individual to the next. I don’t want men competing against women either but it is obvious there is far more to understand here than, “Me Dick she Jane”
Click to expand...
I see, like the pregnant man emoji you clowns browbeat Apple into producing, that kind of cognitive function?
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Your inability to use information is possibly more of an indictment on our society in general or is it due to something you have been exposed to that dulled your cognitive functions? I am highly undereducated but still I am able to understand simple concepts such as a variation in chromosome make up from one individual to the next. I don’t want men competing against women either but it is obvious there is far more to understand here than, “Me Dick she Jane”
Click to expand...
You’re going for insults rather than engaging the question.

Normally you’re above that.
 
MicPaPa said:
I see, like the pregnant man emoji you clowns browbeat Apple into producing, that kind of cognitive function?
Click to expand...
Your generalizations coupled with your bizarre cherry picking have you looking the fool.
You are frightened, that is ok, it’s a natural human reaction to the unknown. Knowledge will set you free.
 
dad4 said:
If you ever wonder how Trumpies get elected, that's it right there.

I ask you to define one of the most common words in the English language, and you reply with a survey of research papers.

You guys might as well wear t-shirts that say "Out of Touch."
Click to expand...
It's a two party system. It was Trump or enable Hillary and a known senile old idiot with his cackling hen moron of a VP. By my count you're 0 for 2.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Your generalizations coupled with your bizarre cherry picking have you looking the fool.
You are frightened, that is ok, it’s a natural human reaction to the unknown. Knowledge will set you free.
Click to expand...
Speaking of looking the fool, it is actually: "The truth will set you free." Also, it is actually: "knowledge is power." I'd say you're 0 for 2 as well, Einstein.
 
GoldenGate said:
The NCAA is not "far left". The IOC is not "far left". Nice try attempting to reclassify trans women as misogynistic men. That's really funny.

Both of those entities fully understand how its policies impact women's sports. Unlike you, they actually weighed the pros and cons and have reached a reasoned decision, which they continue to modify over time as they deem necessary. Do I feel bad for the Virginia swimmer who came in second? Not really. She has lived a life of privilege, is getting a free education and has the opportunity to swim for the USA when the trans swimmer does not (yet). She's doing fine. It's just a race, and who wins is just not that important.
Click to expand...
The NCAA and the IOC? That's comedy gold. Ignoring their corruption, neither organization has a reputation for doing what's best for athletes. Instead they have a reputation for doing what's best for their own interests. I know that you have a blind reverence for authority, but those organizations hardly provide any credibility to your argument. What you couldn't find any transgender policies for FIFA?
 
Hüsker Dü said:
The Auckland report? If that’s what you are calling a “study” (seemingly miss using the term in attempted subterfuge?) I don’t think that report says what you think it does . . . but as you are maintaining a cloak of secrecy as to what your opinion is on it or from where you even derived the information to base that on it may just remain a mystery on both counts.
If you can’t just have an honest discussion you simply are as Grace might say, a troll.
Click to expand...
you are tiresome. The link to the NIH study is in yoru article - quit being so dim. I don't even know what the Auckland report is.

"subterfuge", "I don’t think that report says what you think it does . . . but as you are maintaining a cloak of secrecy as to what your opinion is on it or from where you even derived the information to base that on it may just remain a mystery on both counts" ----word salad.
 
what-happened said:
you are tiresome. The link to the NIH study is in yoru article - quit being so dim. I don't even know what the Auckland report is.

"subterfuge", "I don’t think that report says what you think it does . . . but as you are maintaining a cloak of secrecy as to what your opinion is on it or from where you even derived the information to base that on it may just remain a mystery on both counts" ----word salad.
Click to expand...
So the mystery continues.
 
MicPaPa said:
Speaking of looking the fool, it is actually: "The truth will set you free." Also, it is actually: "knowledge is power." I'd say you're 0 for 2 as well, Einstein.
Click to expand...
Are you stuck in mud? Bible quotes? Of course the precise wording of which depends on which version you wish to quote. I of course I was freelancing a quote of my own, but you do you it seems to fit quite well in your case.
 
dad4 said:
If you ever wonder how Trumpies get elected, that's it right there.

I ask you to define one of the most common words in the English language, and you reply with a survey of research papers.

You guys might as well wear t-shirts that say "Out of Touch."
Click to expand...

Ha ha. I'm telling you why something is ACTUALLY happening and has been for more than a decade, yet you're trying to tell me that I'm the one who is out of touch? That's funny.

Were you also making the argument that people shouldn't support civil rights because it might get awful people elected when LBJ was integrating schools? When Obergfell finally allowed for gay marriage?
 
watfly said:
B I N G O
Click to expand...

FYI, Trump lost. Should we also send arms to Russia to support their invasion of Ukraine because that's also what Trump wants? Should we give up on abortion rights because otherwise people will vote for Trump? Should we give up on environmental protection too? The argument that people shouldn't support something because it might cause a trumper to still vote for Trump is a pretty stupid argument.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top