The Auckland report? If that’s what you are calling a “study” (seemingly miss using the term in attempted subterfuge?) I don’t think that report says what you think it does . . . but as you are maintaining a cloak of secrecy as to what your opinion is on it or from where you even derived the information to base that on it may just remain a mystery on both counts.Did you read the study?
I see, like the pregnant man emoji you clowns browbeat Apple into producing, that kind of cognitive function?Your inability to use information is possibly more of an indictment on our society in general or is it due to something you have been exposed to that dulled your cognitive functions? I am highly undereducated but still I am able to understand simple concepts such as a variation in chromosome make up from one individual to the next. I don’t want men competing against women either but it is obvious there is far more to understand here than, “Me Dick she Jane”
You’re going for insults rather than engaging the question.Your inability to use information is possibly more of an indictment on our society in general or is it due to something you have been exposed to that dulled your cognitive functions? I am highly undereducated but still I am able to understand simple concepts such as a variation in chromosome make up from one individual to the next. I don’t want men competing against women either but it is obvious there is far more to understand here than, “Me Dick she Jane”
How is this fair?" In their defense (which I hesitate to do), the NCAA did the fair thing and allowed thomas to swim."
Your generalizations coupled with your bizarre cherry picking have you looking the fool.I see, like the pregnant man emoji you clowns browbeat Apple into producing, that kind of cognitive function?
What question? I went back over the thread and saw no overt question? Is this something you implied?You’re going for insults rather than engaging the question.
Normally you’re above that.
It's a two party system. It was Trump or enable Hillary and a known senile old idiot with his cackling hen moron of a VP. By my count you're 0 for 2.If you ever wonder how Trumpies get elected, that's it right there.
I ask you to define one of the most common words in the English language, and you reply with a survey of research papers.
You guys might as well wear t-shirts that say "Out of Touch."
Speaking of looking the fool, it is actually: "The truth will set you free." Also, it is actually: "knowledge is power." I'd say you're 0 for 2 as well, Einstein.Your generalizations coupled with your bizarre cherry picking have you looking the fool.
You are frightened, that is ok, it’s a natural human reaction to the unknown. Knowledge will set you free.
The NCAA and the IOC? That's comedy gold. Ignoring their corruption, neither organization has a reputation for doing what's best for athletes. Instead they have a reputation for doing what's best for their own interests. I know that you have a blind reverence for authority, but those organizations hardly provide any credibility to your argument. What you couldn't find any transgender policies for FIFA?The NCAA is not "far left". The IOC is not "far left". Nice try attempting to reclassify trans women as misogynistic men. That's really funny.
Both of those entities fully understand how its policies impact women's sports. Unlike you, they actually weighed the pros and cons and have reached a reasoned decision, which they continue to modify over time as they deem necessary. Do I feel bad for the Virginia swimmer who came in second? Not really. She has lived a life of privilege, is getting a free education and has the opportunity to swim for the USA when the trans swimmer does not (yet). She's doing fine. It's just a race, and who wins is just not that important.
you are tiresome. The link to the NIH study is in yoru article - quit being so dim. I don't even know what the Auckland report is.The Auckland report? If that’s what you are calling a “study” (seemingly miss using the term in attempted subterfuge?) I don’t think that report says what you think it does . . . but as you are maintaining a cloak of secrecy as to what your opinion is on it or from where you even derived the information to base that on it may just remain a mystery on both counts.
If you can’t just have an honest discussion you simply are as Grace might say, a troll.
So the mystery continues.you are tiresome. The link to the NIH study is in yoru article - quit being so dim. I don't even know what the Auckland report is.
"subterfuge", "I don’t think that report says what you think it does . . . but as you are maintaining a cloak of secrecy as to what your opinion is on it or from where you even derived the information to base that on it may just remain a mystery on both counts" ----word salad.
Are you stuck in mud? Bible quotes? Of course the precise wording of which depends on which version you wish to quote. I of course I was freelancing a quote of my own, but you do you it seems to fit quite well in your case.Speaking of looking the fool, it is actually: "The truth will set you free." Also, it is actually: "knowledge is power." I'd say you're 0 for 2 as well, Einstein.
Sure thing genius. BTW, "a rolling stone collects no mud!" LOL...clown!Are you stuck in mud? Bible quotes? Of course the precise wording of which depends on which version you wish to quote. I of course I was freelancing a quote of my own, but you do you it seems to fit quite well in your case.
If you ever wonder how Trumpies get elected, that's it right there.
I ask you to define one of the most common words in the English language, and you reply with a survey of research papers.
You guys might as well wear t-shirts that say "Out of Touch."
Well done! Nutters usually don’t possess the ability to ad-lib. You sure you aren’t a plant?Sure thing genius. BTW, "a rolling stone collects no mud!" LOL...clown!
ha, only in your head is there a mystery. Read your article, click on the link, read the study, become informed.So the mystery continues.
B I N G O
The NCAA and the IOC? That's comedy gold. Ignoring their corruption, neither organization has a reputation for doing what's best for athletes. Instead they have a reputation for doing what's best for their own interests. I know that you have a blind reverence for authority, but those organizations hardly provide any credibility to your argument. What you couldn't find any transgender policies for FIFA?
where is the fairness piece of compeition...or that just isn't in the calculations. You are quite delusional, wrapped up in your blanket of rhetoric and agendas. It's obvious you hold women in high regard.So I guess you're saying the NCAA and IOC have decided that winning a race in a pool just isn't that important compared to inclusion and equality in society and helping transgender people overcome all of the hostility and discrimination they have suffered for generations? I guess you're also saying that the NCAA and IOC have determined that their best financial interests include ignoring people like you who are actually out of touch. Or are you saying the all powerful transgender mafia made them do it?
@GoldenGate maybe you should attend this event and let all of them know that we should stop raising snowflakes...what does the Surgeon General know anyway or any of those doctors on the panel...you're much smarter than all of them!!! Weak minded fail kids, who needs them, right?
![]()
State of the Kids: Uniting for Youth Mental Health
Join us for a nationwide virtual event to chart a healthier way forward for our kids.www.eventbrite.com