Vaccine

I'm not the bad guy. I'm not the reason any Herman Cain Award winner became an anti-vaxxer/masker. I'm not the reason any of the anti-vax/mask memes and manifestos that they think are funny here look a lot more sad and pathetic when they're in so many dead schmucks' Facebook feeds. The only despicable people here are those who contribute to those memes misleading people all the way to their deaths. If they're going to whoop it up on the front end, it is disrespectful of them to get upset and blame others about having to confront the consequences on the back end, or maybe we should call it the dead end.
#8 A case is only a case if a person is sick. Mass testing asymptomatic individuals is harmful to public health.
 
I'm not the bad guy. I'm not the reason any Herman Cain Award winner became an anti-vaxxer/masker. I'm not the reason any of the anti-vax/mask memes and manifestos that they think are funny here look a lot more sad and pathetic when they're in so many dead schmucks' Facebook feeds. The only despicable people here are those who contribute to those memes misleading people all the way to their deaths. If they're going to whoop it up on the front end, it is disrespectful of them to get upset and blame others about having to confront the consequences on the back end, or maybe we should call it the dead end.
#9 Public health is about trust. To gain the trust of the public, public health officials and the media must be honest and trust the public. Shaming and fear should never be used in a pandemic.
thehill.com/opinion/health…
 
I'm not the bad guy. I'm not the reason any Herman Cain Award winner became an anti-vaxxer/masker. I'm not the reason any of the anti-vax/mask memes and manifestos that they think are funny here look a lot more sad and pathetic when they're in so many dead schmucks' Facebook feeds. The only despicable people here are those who contribute to those memes misleading people all the way to their deaths. If they're going to whoop it up on the front end, it is disrespectful of them to get upset and blame others about having to confront the consequences on the back end, or maybe we should call it the dead end.
#10 Public health scientists and officials must be honest with what is not known. For example, epidemic models should be run with the whole range of plausible input parameters.
 
I'm not the bad guy. I'm not the reason any Herman Cain Award winner became an anti-vaxxer/masker. I'm not the reason any of the anti-vax/mask memes and manifestos that they think are funny here look a lot more sad and pathetic when they're in so many dead schmucks' Facebook feeds. The only despicable people here are those who contribute to those memes misleading people all the way to their deaths. If they're going to whoop it up on the front end, it is disrespectful of them to get upset and blame others about having to confront the consequences on the back end, or maybe we should call it the dead end.
#11 In public health, open civilized debate is profoundly critical. Censoring, silencing and smearing leads to fear of speaking, herd thinking and distrust.
scientificamerican.com/article/the-co… @JeanneLenzer1
 
I'm not the bad guy. I'm not the reason any Herman Cain Award winner became an anti-vaxxer/masker. I'm not the reason any of the anti-vax/mask memes and manifestos that they think are funny here look a lot more sad and pathetic when they're in so many dead schmucks' Facebook feeds. The only despicable people here are those who contribute to those memes misleading people all the way to their deaths. If they're going to whoop it up on the front end, it is disrespectful of them to get upset and blame others about having to confront the consequences on the back end, or maybe we should call it the dead end.
#12 It is important for public health scientists and officials to listen to the public, who are living the public health consequences. This pandemic has proved that many non-epidemiologists understand public health better than some epidemiologists.
 
THE HISTORY OF FLATH EARTHER, FEAR MONGERING FAUCI......AT IT THEN, AT IT NOW

HIS FOLLOWERS ARE HERE TODAY. YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE.


Writing in today’s Wall Street Journal, John Tierney – looking back to the time when AIDS first arrived on the scene – observes about Covid-19 that

if we had paid attention to history, we would have known that once a disease becomes newsworthy, science gets distorted by researchers, journalists, activists and politicians eager for attention and power—and determined to silence those who challenge their fear-mongering.
Here’s another slice from Tierney’s superb WSJ essay:

When AIDS spread among gay men and intravenous drug users four decades ago, it became conventional wisdom that the plague would soon devastate the rest of the American population. In 1987, Oprah Winfrey opened her show by announcing, “Research studies now project that 1 in 5—listen to me, hard to believe—1 in 5 heterosexuals could be dead of AIDS in the next three years.” The prediction was outlandishly wrong, but she wasn’t wrong in attributing the scare to scientists.

One early alarmist was Anthony Fauci, who made national news in 1983 with an editorial in the Journal of the American Medical Association warning that AIDS could infect even children because of “the possibility that routine close contact, as within a family household, can spread the disease.” After criticism that he had inspired a wave of hysterical homophobia, Dr. Fauci (who in 1984 began his current job, as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases), promptly pivoted 180 degrees, declaring less than two months after his piece appeared that it was “absolutely preposterous” to suggest AIDS could be spread by normal social contact. But other supposed experts went on warning erroneously that AIDS could spread widely via toilet seats, mosquito bites and kissing.

Robert Redfield, an Army physician who would later direct the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during the Covid pandemic, claimed in 1985 that his research on soldiers showed AIDS would soon spread as rapidly among heterosexuals as among homosexuals. He and other scientists became much-quoted authorities for the imminent “heterosexual breakout,” which was proclaimed on the covers of Life in 1985 (“Now No One Is Safe from AIDS”) and the Atlantic in 1987 (“Heterosexuals and AIDS: The Second Stage of the Epidemic”).

In reality, researchers discovered early on that transmission through vaginal intercourse was rare, and that those who claimed to have been infected that way were typically concealing intravenous drug use or homosexual activity. One major study estimated the risk of contracting AIDS during intercourse with someone outside the known risk groups was 1 in 5 million. But the CDC nonetheless started a publicity campaign warning that everyone was in danger. It mailed brochures to more than 100 million households and aired dozens of public-service announcements, like a television ad with a man proclaiming, “If I can get AIDS, anyone can.”
 
The comparison of LA and Orange counties should be an end to the debate over how effective indoor mask mandates are....


No, but you have settled the debate over whether there are any anti-mask folks on the site.

(Yes, yes. You say are not arguing against masks, you're just arguing against mandates. Wink, wink, and all that.)
 
No, but you have settled the debate over whether there are any anti-mask folks on the site.

(Yes, yes. You say are not arguing against masks, you're just arguing against mandates. Wink, wink, and all that.)
500k deaths. Why would you argue for?
 
No, but you have settled the debate over whether there are any anti-mask folks on the site.

(Yes, yes. You say are not arguing against masks, you're just arguing against mandates. Wink, wink, and all that.)
Ha! You have joined the "anti" name-calling crowd. I thought you were more nuanced. I don't think mask mandates are particularly effective in practice in the US but I wear a mask when I am required. Does that make me "anti" mask?
 
No, but you have settled the debate over whether there are any anti-mask folks on the site.

(Yes, yes. You say are not arguing against masks, you're just arguing against mandates. Wink, wink, and all that.)
It’s the mirror argument of what you are arguing about Asia…in Asia they are more culturally acclimated to them so they use them more effectively

It’s why I think they help a little on a micro basis. On a macro basis they don’t because people don’t/won’t wear them properly in situations where it actually matters: offices, construction sites, jobs with prolonged contacts; airplanes and theaters; indoor bars dining where they are just theater; private gatherings; at home with family. Plus we use a lot of the inferior cloth masks. They probably help in situations like doctors offices stores and markets but as a percentage of cases that’s just tiny

im actually agreeing with your earlier reasoning…which is also the reason mask mandates don’t show any noticeable impact (at least in the west). And “be more Asian”, as we discussed, is not policy

if anything you should be grateful that I’m offering an explanation for why your preferred tool is not working the way you want it to
 
I have to say its disturbing the glee with which you make these death posts. I find it incredibly creepy that your so vested in proving your point that you'll revel in other peoples deaths to do so. I might suggest you find another hobby.

You make it sound like he laughed at gravestone quotes or something...
 
It’s the mirror argument of what you are arguing about Asia…in Asia they are more culturally acclimated to them so they use them more effectively

It’s why I think they help a little on a micro basis. On a macro basis they don’t because people don’t/won’t wear them properly in situations where it actually matters: offices, construction sites, jobs with prolonged contacts; airplanes and theaters; indoor bars dining where they are just theater; private gatherings; at home with family. Plus we use a lot of the inferior cloth masks. They probably help in situations like doctors offices stores and markets but as a percentage of cases that’s just tiny

im actually agreeing with your earlier reasoning…which is also the reason mask mandates don’t show any noticeable impact (at least in the west). And “be more Asian”, as we discussed, is not policy

if anything you should be grateful that I’m offering an explanation for why your preferred tool is not working the way you want it to
Don’t wear them properly? So, masks only work in Asia because people there are really good and bending the nose wires just right?

You used one word too many. The problem isn’t that “people don’t wear them properly”. The problem is that people don’t wear them.

They put the mask on at the grocery store to buy beer for their indoor party, and think they did their part because they wore a mask “when required to do so”.
 
Don’t wear them properly? So, masks only work in Asia because people there are really good and bending the nose wires just right?

You used one word too many. The problem isn’t that “people don’t wear them properly”. The problem is that people don’t wear them.

They put the mask on at the grocery store to buy beer for their indoor party, and think they did their part because they wore a mask “when required to do so”.
Ok. That’s fine (though I’d also include the chin diapers and nose peekers) . They aren’t going to help if you are working shoulder to shoulder with someone for hours (Asians might stay home if unwell). But that’s also the only place you can police it short of going full australia. That’s one reason at least why mandates will fail (another is the cloth masks). Because the places where you police them aren’t where the overwhelming amount of transmission happens. Again you are doing morality not policy.
 
You see dad gets stuck look at the numbers on his piece of paper and then looks around the world hoping to find something that works.

Japan and others have a variety of factors it seems that contribute to where they are vs public policy getting them there. In other words it isn't mask policy and shutting down the pub being the key driver of where they are.

The strongest statistically significant correlation we found was that countries in the Asia-Pacific region are more likely to have lower COVID-19 death levels. This supports a theory that has been proposed by Tatsuhiko Kodama, a professor at the University of Tokyo, that states people in Asia-Pacific countries (including Asian countries as well as Russia, Australia and New Zealand) have some existing background immunity due to more exposure to other coronaviruses that circulate more here.

Another strong correlation we found was that countries with higher percentages of blood type B tend to have lower levels of COVID-19 deaths. This is consistent with a recent finding by scientists studying blood type and COVID-19. We also found a correlation between a higher percentage of those with East Asian genes in the population and lower deaths, echoing studies that are currently looking into whether East Asians are genetically less susceptible.



Here is a paper looking at a variety of factors, from other early vaccines to prior exposure, to masks, etc.

 
You make it sound like he laughed at gravestone quotes or something...
You're one of the reasonable people on this thread, I have a hard time believing you support his rhetoric. He intentionally makes up people's positions so he has something to argue about and spew ad hominems. We should call him Don Quixote since he's always "tilting at windmills".
 
Covid drugs & other cocktails they serve you after recent infection post J&J shot in May 2021. My buddyʻs 10th day of quarantine is today. He felt fine the whole time post infection. See below for the arsenal they employed to limp the vaccine along:



  1. Solu-medrol injection and
Rocephin 2, 1 Graham injections. 1 time.

  1. Ivermectin tablets 10/Daily. 7 days
  2. Monoclonal injection 1 time
  3. NAC 1/daily. 14 days
  4. Hydroxychloroquine 2/daily. 7 day.
  5. Prednisone 2/daily. 7 days.
  6. Azithromycin 1/daily. 7 days
  7. Bayer aspirin 1/Daily 10 days (not prescription)
  8. Zinc. 1/daily 10 days (not prescription)
  9. Vitamin C (not prescription)
  10. Vitamin D3 (not prescription)
  11. Nebulizer, Ipratropium Bromide & Albuterol Sulfate 3-4/daily 7 days.
  12. Oxygen tank for whenever I want.
 
Some California counties enacted strict indoor mask mandates in response to the summer wave. Others did nothing.

But when comparing counties with similar vaccination rates, we see “near-identical hospitalization outcomes despite different mask policies.”

Interestingly, San Diego County — which has a higher vaccination rate than Los Angeles and Orange counties — had a higher case rate than those two counties, but similar hospitalization figures. San Diego, Los Angeles, Orange and Ventura counties had near-identical hospitalization outcomes despite different mask policies.

https://www.sfgate.com/coronavirus/...ndates-delta-COVID-19-data-works-16502191.php
 
You're one of the reasonable people on this thread, I have a hard time believing you support his rhetoric. He intentionally makes up people's positions so he has something to argue about and spew ad hominems. We should call him Don Quixote since he's always "tilting at windmills".

Why are you having such a hard time confronting the reality that the anti-mask/vax shit posting that you think is so funny here isn't so funny when the exact same posts fill the FB feeds of one dead schmuck after the next? Instead, they're humiliating, pathetic and profoundly sad. You just want to pretend that there aren't actual repercussions for your irresponsible behavior.

Here are a few of the Herman Cain Award winners who subscribed to your belief that we should ignore what "lab people" say and instead rely "on the front line." Like you, they also ignored that virtually everyone on the front line says that the best way to avoid dying is to get vaccinated so we don't need to stuff your dumb ass with horse paste.

https://www.reddit.com/r/HermanCain...en_you_go_all_in_on_vitamin_d_to_fight_covid/
 
Why are you having such a hard time confronting the reality that the anti-mask/vax shit posting that you think is so funny here isn't so funny when the exact same posts fill the FB feeds of one dead schmuck after the next? Instead, they're humiliating, pathetic and profoundly sad. You just want to pretend that there aren't actual repercussions for your irresponsible behavior.

Here are a few of the Herman Cain Award winners who subscribed to your belief that we should ignore what "lab people" say and instead rely "on the front line." Like you, they also ignored that virtually everyone on the front line says that the best way to avoid dying is to get vaccinated so we don't need to stuff your dumb ass with horse paste.

https://www.reddit.com/r/HermanCain...en_you_go_all_in_on_vitamin_d_to_fight_covid/
It’s more comical that use use Reddit as a source for your trolling attacks……..

carry on….
 
Back
Top