Trans eligibility rules for girls sports.

SurFutbol said:
Actually, the Karens are the ones whining about needing AR-15s because they’re terrified black person, and now apparently trans children, might walk in front of their house. Remember the McCloskeys?
Click to expand...

Black person? You mean "people"?

I remember the McCloskeys. The spent months watching BLM rioters harass innocent people, burn cars, burn businesses, murder a black police officer and black security guard, and decided to protect their home when a bunch of rioters breached their gated neighborhood.

I guess you think that's okay, though, right? Is that what 'protestors' do... breach private property? Or was January 6th an anomaly?
 
SurFutbol said:
I guess that is one way to rationalize your belief that all these dead school children is the price of freedom, although the reality is all this unnecessary killing is not freedom at all.
Click to expand...

How come all these dead school children don't bother you when it happens on a daily basis across this country? Handguns, knives, drugs, DUIs, parental abuse, etc. Lots of reasons why children die.

Is there nobody you can get billable hours from in those cases?
 
SurFutbol said:
BTW, DeSantis can’t stop Disney, and now he can’t stop State Farm. But, hey, he’s done a bang up job pretending slavery never happened and banning poems by Amanda Gorman.

Click to expand...

Disney is bleeding employees out their asshole. So yeah, he's putting the hurt on Disney.

State Farm pandered years ago... or did you think Jake when from a fat white guy to a muscular black one because the James Bond series needed a new lead?
 
I love how the republican platform has essentially been reduced to:

1. banning maybe 100 trans children in the US from playing kiddie sports;
2. killing as many children as it takes cuz that’s the price of freedom; and
3. trying to get Prince Harry kicked out of the US for doing dar less cocaine than Matt Gaetz.

www.cnn.com

US court to hear challenge over Prince Harry's visa following drug revelations | CNN

Prince Harry’s US immigration records should be unsealed in the light of revelations about drug-taking in his recent book, a conservative think tank will argue in a federal court next week.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
 
Chelsea dad g09 said:
If by assault rifle you mean an ar then my opinion, same as any other gun, self defense and hunting.
Click to expand...
Aren't there other weapons that are better served for those purposes? I could be wrong, but I believe that it wasn't designed for those purposes, albeit some do use it in that manner. Apparently the main advantage of an AR-15 is that it is semi-automatic, so is it popular for hunting for those less skilled that can't take down an animal in one shot?

I don't know if an AR/AW ban would be effective, but it seems its primary and most effective purpose is for mass killing of humans (or a herd of jack rabbits which would be wanton waste). It certainly has proven its ability to be effective in mass killings, although in terms of total killings a handgun is probably leading.

To me there is a balancing act, a ban on AR/AW sales may, or may not be effective, but by the same token it wouldn't limit someone's ability to effectively hunt or protect themselves.
 
watfly said:
Aren't there other weapons that are better served for those purposes? I could be wrong, but I believe that it wasn't designed for those purposes, albeit some do use it in that manner. Apparently the main advantage of an AR-15 is that it is semi-automatic, so is it popular for hunting for those less skilled that can't take down an animal in one shot?

I don't know if an AR/AW ban would be effective, but it seems its primary and most effective purpose is for mass killing of humans (or a herd of jack rabbits which would be wanton waste). It certainly has proven its ability to be effective in mass killings, although in terms of total killings a handgun is probably leading.

To me there is a balancing act, a ban on AR/AW sales may, or may not be effective, but by the same token it wouldn't limit someone's ability to effectively hunt or protect themselves.
Click to expand...
You're correct it was designed to be a lightweight, higher capacity weapon to the m1 garand, difference is the semi auto. Most hunting weapons are semi auto, see the ruger mini 14. Same weapon as an ar, just looks like a "hunting rifle" so nobody says a word, but they would want to ban the hi point 380 carbine, makes zero sense.
The main problem I see is that handguns are far and away the leading cause of gun violence in this country and everyone is focused on the "assault rifle". I said earlier if anyone wants to start with a ban, they shouldn't be taken seriously because A. They're worried about the 1% instead of the 99% B. It does nothing to address the root cause of these shootings and C. Like our friend sur has shown us, it doesnt stop there but will soon include all guns.
The DOJ has already said they dont know if the assault weapon worked or didnt so anyone spouting that it did is gravely mistaken.
I personally believe everyone has a right to defend themselves and their family and at this point there are so many "assault weapons" it has to be considered that citizens should be able to defend themselves against them, odd as that sounds. I have and have owned several ar's and it's not my go to for self defense in fact it just sits in the safe, but who am I to tell anyone what they can and cannot do for their family.
 
Chelsea dad g09 said:
You're correct it was designed to be a lightweight, higher capacity weapon to the m1 garand, difference is the semi auto. Most hunting weapons are semi auto, see the ruger mini 14. Same weapon as an ar, just looks like a "hunting rifle" so nobody says a word, but they would want to ban the hi point 380 carbine, makes zero sense.
The main problem I see is that handguns are far and away the leading cause of gun violence in this country and everyone is focused on the "assault rifle". I said earlier if anyone wants to start with a ban, they shouldn't be taken seriously because A. They're worried about the 1% instead of the 99% B. It does nothing to address the root cause of these shootings and C. Like our friend sur has shown us, it doesnt stop there but will soon include all guns.
The DOJ has already said they dont know if the assault weapon worked or didnt so anyone spouting that it did is gravely mistaken.
I personally believe everyone has a right to defend themselves and their family and at this point there are so many "assault weapons" it has to be considered that citizens should be able to defend themselves against them, odd as that sounds. I have and have owned several ar's and it's not my go to for self defense in fact it just sits in the safe, but who am I to tell anyone what they can and cannot do for their family.
Click to expand...
Excellent splaining this gun stuff. I don't like guns but I respect them 100% and respect the right to bear arms. I use my words :) I shot M1 Garand back in late 80s. If I remember correctly, Gov was giving them away for cheap but you had to take a lesson. I did it for my oldest bro so he could have 3 of them. It had a strong kick back. Powerful weapon.
 
Dark Brandon has some evil pics coming out from his son's Hunter's Laptop from hell. These men are obviously sick and it sickens me that Pedo Pete is running our country and falling all the time. I won't post these pics but man, this is sick. God, please help us.
 
crush said:
Dark Brandon has some evil pics coming out from his son's Hunter's Laptop from hell. These men are obviously sick and it sickens me that Pedo Pete is running our country and falling all the time. I won't post these pics but man, this is sick. God, please help us.
Click to expand...

The trans are coming for you.
 
Chelsea dad g09 said:
You're correct it was designed to be a lightweight, higher capacity weapon to the m1 garand, difference is the semi auto. Most hunting weapons are semi auto, see the ruger mini 14. Same weapon as an ar, just looks like a "hunting rifle" so nobody says a word, but they would want to ban the hi point 380 carbine, makes zero sense.
The main problem I see is that handguns are far and away the leading cause of gun violence in this country and everyone is focused on the "assault rifle". I said earlier if anyone wants to start with a ban, they shouldn't be taken seriously because A. They're worried about the 1% instead of the 99% B. It does nothing to address the root cause of these shootings and C. Like our friend sur has shown us, it doesnt stop there but will soon include all guns.
The DOJ has already said they dont know if the assault weapon worked or didnt so anyone spouting that it did is gravely mistaken.
I personally believe everyone has a right to defend themselves and their family and at this point there are so many "assault weapons" it has to be considered that citizens should be able to defend themselves against them, odd as that sounds. I have and have owned several ar's and it's not my go to for self defense in fact it just sits in the safe, but who am I to tell anyone what they can and cannot do for their family.
Click to expand...

You’ll lose the shootout you claim to be itching for cuz you’re an idiot. If anything, you gun nutters’ children will use the guns on themselves.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top