Time to Play

Soccermaverick said:
Here is the Truth about Outlaw. Outlaw doesn’t measure his success by what he does FOR people, he measures it by what he does AGAINST people he doesn’t like. That is why he sees himself as being “successful “. This is why Outlaw will never abandon his principles. Outlaw tormenting other people sustains him.
Click to expand...

You're a fucking moron.
 
Simisoccerfan said:
I agree with your comments about education. Another thing that needs to be encouraged in society is the two parent household. I have seen stats that show kids from single parent households struggle more in school and attend college less. Regardless of race, religion, sexual orientation, or poltical party households with two parent's commited to their kids is a much better environment for academic success.
Click to expand...
Most importantly, very early childhood education. The support has to start in the years before age 5.
 
Grace T. said:
Tribe and Freid among others. 1st Amendment.
Click to expand...

p.s. I was also involved in writing the Russian Constitution. Didn't go so hot. They didn't listen to our advice to limit their presidential term. The reason they failed to listen, though I can't reveal the details of the story, was in fact in part racism.
 
Simisoccerfan said:
I agree with your comments about education. Another thing that needs to be encouraged in society is the two parent household. I have seen stats that show kids from single parent households struggle more in school and attend college less. Regardless of race, religion, sexual orientation, or poltical party households with two parent's commited to their kids is a much better environment for academic success.
Click to expand...
The divorce rate is at 52%, so 52% of students struggle? I have seen better parenting from a single parent household than a two parent household. It really depends on the family.
 
EOTL said:
Good, that’s what you idiots deserve. If you want to live vicariously through your kids, put on your mask and stay home.

There is no stopping protests. Period. Get over it. The Governor is not going to shoot and tear people and he shouldn’t. Protests are not an excuse for you and your mostly racist anti-science moron friends to continue being idiots about the things you actually can control. I get that you don’t believe that systemic racism and police brutality justify protesting and the collateral covid damage that will inevitably result from it. Well, too bad, that is out of your control. At any rate, millions upon millions of people disagree with you, whereas there are only a handful of racists in CA who think protests are a great excuse to get a haircut. But like you said, there is no one-size-fits all solution, so protests can happen because this is not a police state and actual and real constitutional concerns exist about trying to stop them even if you don’t use bullets and tear gas. You going to Applebees or kiddie team sports right now, well, that is just stupid.

I am not at all surprised that you’re all now blaming black people for the fact that lil’ Kaityln, Caitlin, Katelyn, and Kate-Lyn can’t play soccer right now. That is what racists do. How dare they get upset about getting murdered by the police and systemically discriminated against at all steps of life, right? Shelter-in-place is their fault because they and their friends got all uppity over something that you don’t consider to be a big deal?

If you want protests to stop, more of you need to actually show empathy for what is happening to them instead of blaming them that you need to keep using DoorDash. In other words, the protests are not the fault of the people protesting. They are direct consequence of the fact that there are too many people like you who are ok with racism and police brutality.
Click to expand...
"There is no stopping protests" WTF? ...there you go again simpleton...the moronic little games you dummies always play...conflating any objections to killing, assaulting, damaging, burning, stealing, looting rioting etc., with an objection to "Protests", just like you dummies always conflate objections to illegal immigration with legal immigration...then you have idiots like espola and ilk nodding in bovine agreement while giving each other reach-a-rounds. This thread has literally become a discredited democrat clown car of lefty morons on display.
 
EOTL said:
Your freedom of religion non-sense argument is even worse, but I enjoy pointing out how dumb god people are. Your position has already been argued and rejected many times over.
Click to expand...

BOOYAH!!! NDNY just issued an injunction because NY discriminated in favor of the protests against religious worship. Yeah, it's only district court and it doesn't go too far into the outdoor/indoor distinction but so much for your criticism.
 
Copa9 said:
The divorce rate is at 52%, so 52% of students struggle? I have seen better parenting from a single parent household than a two parent household. It really depends on the family.
Click to expand...

Get your facts right. Most studies say the current divorce rate is 39%. And no where did I say that every kid from a single parent household struggles. Plenty of kids thrive despite their setting. But stats due show that in general kids in two parent households are far more likely to have academic success and attend college. The same stats show that parent's education level also has a strong influence on academic success.
 
Grace T. said:
The other big factor is marriage, but that would further take this thread down the rabbit hole with discussions of welfare and religions. You also can't get to a meritocracy so long as elites continue to marry elites. In the 50s/60s business men would marry (or at least have affairs) with their secretaries. But now the power lawyer or the power doctor won't marry someone beneath their income. This is in part being driven by women,who don't want to divide up their resources by carrying a man who might not amount to much. Add to that our society's fixation with defering to experts, licensing to preserve the professional classes, credentialism, and status preferences with elite schools and it's a recipe for a permanent mandarin class. You see this behavior among even African Americans and Hispanics at private or elite elementary/middle/high schools, or President Obama and his wife. In my own circles, they aren't marrying the poor girl just come over on an asymlum claim...they are marrying the doctor, lawyer or sports athlete that made something of themselves and can contribute something to the partnership. The Trump populism is a reaction to this mandarin meritocracy. It's also why many of us have our kids involved in club soccer: as a ticket to college admissions and scholarships and admission into the upper circles, as opposed to the rest of the world where soccer is only a mechanism for either fun or a professional career.



I propose a big fourth of July tournment "to honor the flag and America". It will be accomapnied by speeches before the games reflecting the American spirit. Player's uniforms all have something on them dedicated to the American journey and each team named after a major historical event, from the Constitution, to emmancipation, to women's suffrage. 1st amendment. Can't be limited

.
Click to expand...

One of the great joys of living in a civilized democratic society these days is that society tends to sort out what is important (protesting for civil rights) and what is not (Klan rallies and youth soccer tournaments). If you want to break the law holding a soccer tournament, please make sure more people attend than there are handcuffs, and verify the property owner is ok with the $25k fine. We protesters have our $200 each ready to go in the unlikely event we’re the unlucky few the po po manage to catch if they try. We also aren’t stupid enough to hold a protest somewhere that’s gonna get someone into trouble.

As for your “con law is one of my specialties”, I’m sorry but you come across as a non-practicing attorney at most and, more likely, someone with a poli sci degree and maybe a masters in “legal history.” Regardless, studying under some of the best con law scholars is no substitute for actually being one of them. I don’t really need to debate you on the Constitution because I know. Everyone who knows anything and reads what you write knows.

However, just to rub in your face how wrong you are and how right I am, here’s your buddy Larry T calling me personally and all my protestor friends patriots:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/911978012245057536

I am honored that someone you hold in such high regard is so supportive. Oh, and here he is calling your sad little diaper-wearing tangerine an awful person for holding his Tulsa rally:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274662293809385473

In other words, I knew Larry Tribe. Larry Tribe was a friend of mine and you, ma’am, you’re no Larry Tribe. Jack Kennedy either, obviously, just to make sure you get the joke.

I love Larry because me and him are simpatico, which makes him a lot more useful for me in a debate than just name dropping. And as an aside, Amar’s great too. Both Amars actually.

Do you want to keep saying stupid things about the Constitution so I can keep quoting your esteemed mentor Larry Tribe to prove you wrong? This seems like a really fun new game.
 
EOTL said:
One of the great joys of living in a civilized democratic society these days is that society tends to sort out what is important (protesting for civil rights) and what is not (Klan rallies and youth soccer tournaments). If you want to break the law holding a soccer tournament, please make sure more people attend than there are handcuffs, and verify the property owner is ok with the $25k fine. We protesters have our $200 each ready to go in the unlikely event we’re the unlucky few the po po manage to catch if they try. We also aren’t stupid enough to hold a protest somewhere that’s gonna get someone into trouble.

As for your “con law is one of my specialties”, I’m sorry but you come across as a non-practicing attorney at most and, more likely, someone with a poli sci degree and maybe a masters in “legal history.” Regardless, studying under some of the best con law scholars is no substitute for actually being one of them. I don’t really need to debate you on the Constitution because I know. Everyone who knows anything and reads what you write knows.

However, just to rub in your face how wrong you are and how right I am, here’s your buddy Larry T calling me personally and all my protestor friends patriots:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/911978012245057536

I am honored that someone you hold in such high regard is so supportive. Oh, and here he is calling your sad little diaper-wearing tangerine an awful person for holding his Tulsa rally:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1274662293809385473

In other words, I knew Larry Tribe. Larry Tribe was a friend of mine and you, ma’am, you’re no Larry Tribe. Jack Kennedy either, obviously, just to make sure you get the joke.

I love Larry because me and him are simpatico, which makes him a lot more useful for me in a debate than just name dropping. And as an aside, Amar’s great too. Both Amars actually.

Do you want to keep saying stupid things about the Constitution so I can keep quoting your esteemed mentor Larry Tribe to prove you wrong? This seems like a really fun new game.
Click to expand...

He worked for Al Gore. You remember Al, he invented this here internets! Did you think he'd say something positive about Trump?
 
EOTL said:
Do you want to keep saying stupid things about the Constitution so I can keep quoting your esteemed mentor Larry Tribe to prove you wrong? This seems like a really fun new game.
Click to expand...

Wow reading comprehension. Clearly he never taught you to read in detail. Don't know how you ever got through law school. I never said he was my mentor. If anything I vehemently disagreed with a good portion of what he said, particularly when it came to the Commerce clause stuff. The question asked was who did I study under. I answered, among others. From the references you can figure out where I went to law school. And for the record, a court just sustained my argument with an injunction. Where'd you go again? Who'd you study with?
 
Soccermaverick said:
It is not good enough to practice the golden rule...you must work at your implicit bias...

Anti-racism includes beliefs, actions, movements, and policies adopted or developed to oppose racism.

"Anti-racism can be defined as some form of focused and sustained action, which includes inter-cultural, inter-faith, multi-lingual and inter-abled (i.e. differently abled) communities with the intent to change a system or an institutional policy, practice, or procedure which has racist effects."[1]

Get this book to educate yourself...

This Book Is Anti-Racist: 20 Lessons on How to Wake Up, Take Action, and Do The Work https://www.amazon.com/dp/0711245215/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_2CJ9EbX53Y4PV
Click to expand...
No thanks, this senseless drivel works best for you self-hating lefties...If it's all the same to you, I'll stick with the Bible along with a healthy dose of the US Constitution and Bill of Rights.
 
Grace T. said:
BOOYAH!!! NDNY just issued an injunction because NY discriminated in favor of the protests against religious worship. Yeah, it's only district court and it doesn't go too far into the outdoor/indoor distinction but so much for your criticism.
Click to expand...

Indeed, like I’ve been saying, if the Klan - including their Christian comrades - wants to organize an outdoor rally, go for it. Their pastor is just as dumb and malicious as Trump.

Look, misrepresenting what cases say might work for the weak-minded fools that you people normally associate with, but me and my friend Larry T. know the truth. I’m a patriot, while you people are divisive.
 
MicPaPa said:
No thanks, this senseless drivel works best for you self-hating lefties...If it's all the same to you, I'll stick with the Bible along with a healthy dose of the US Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Click to expand...
I can’t rawdog America the way Trump does. I think you need $130,000 to go rawdog.


Trump’s DOJ asks the Supreme Court to strip health care from 23 million people
The government’s arguments are ridiculous.

There’s a fucking pandemic and this asshat is taking health care away

Living in America is calling the police that could kill someone and call an ambulance that could bankrupt someone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top