T 2.0

Assuming they are not just cherry-picking, as both sides do.
There are no sides dummy, only WE THE PEOPLE. I told you this for years. The GOP was taken over by Trump and MAGA in 2016. Now the DNC will be destroyed with the RINOs and USAID for now. More winning is coming. Buckle up and get popcorn because the one's WHO lied to you and stole from you and poisoned you, have no more access to the money. Guess what that means?
 
“Newsnation”? Quite the impartial source.
I think you're confused with NewsMax. NewsNation is about as impartial as you can get on cable news. Chris Cuomo is one of their lead anchors.
 
Putting babies in ovens, mutilating women while raping them and throwing gays off buildings isn't remotely close to anything Trump or Musk are doing.
Ah yes change the subject with the emotional appeal. We can all agree on the evil perpetrated, but unless I’m wrong the subject was Trump.
 
I think you're confused with NewsMax. NewsNation is about as impartial as you can get on cable news. Chris Cuomo is one of their lead anchors.
He's not confused. He's lost because he's lost every year since 2016. Q is DOGE. ELON is a part of Q. Q is everywhere now. Nowhere to run or hide. Audits are coming and that's why these freaks are freaking out. I told you that when one loses their money, you will see what their about. My pal lost his job and his money years ago and got depressed. You know what his wife did? She told him to get his shit together or she will leave. It took him time to get his shit together and his ex-wife left him for a rich guy.
 
Putting babies in ovens, mutilating women while raping them and throwing gays off buildings isn't remotely close to anything Trump or Musk are doing.
Sigh .. the IDF knee capping thousands of unarmed men, women and children is also bat shit crazy, but I was talking policy / politics and not comparing Trump or Musk to terrorists.
 
I think you're confused with NewsMax. NewsNation is about as impartial as you can get on cable news. Chris Cuomo is one of their lead anchors.
Yes I have seen their “we’re impartial” attempted schtick. They are right leaning at best. O’Reilly certainly doesn’t get enough push back or get fact checked by the long covid guy. The other programs display soft criticism towards the right, but never dig in too deep.
 
Sigh .. the IDF knee capping thousands of unarmed men, women and children is also bat shit crazy, but I was talking policy / politics and not comparing Trump or Musk to terrorists.
Pay for play is over. We playing a new game now. Truth, fairness, equality, honesty and merit will be the foundation
 
Yes I have seen their “we’re impartial” attempted schtick. They are right leaning at best. O’Reilly certainly doesn’t get enough push back or get fact checked by the long covid guy.
Look at poor little Husker Du. Just wait dumb, it's going to get way worse for you.
 
What do you think the Trump administration may be hiding? It was obvious what the Biden administration was hiding.
The info coming out is obviously one sided and justifying the actions. That's not transparency, its PR. That does not mean any of the info is false, just as it does not mean that other info that would be negative PR is not being held back. This is PR 101 stuff and you surely know that.

There's plenty of waste in the Fed Gov, eliminating it is great, and I fully support that. Blindly believing one side is silly, as you, amongst others, have been advocating on here for quite some time now.
 
Sigh .. the IDF knee capping thousands of unarmed men, women and children is also bat shit crazy, but I was talking policy / politics and not comparing Trump or Musk to terrorists.
We will never agree on this topic. An opinion piece, but lays out the fact that Palestinian's have no interest in a two state solution, despite Israeli offers to do so. I think your position is the "alternate reality" that this article speaks to.

 
The info coming out is obviously one sided and justifying the actions. That's not transparency, its PR. That does not mean any of the info is false, just as it does not mean that other info that would be negative PR is not being held back. This is PR 101 stuff and you surely know that.

There's plenty of waste in the Fed Gov, eliminating it is great, and I fully support that. Blindly believing one side is silly, as you, amongst others, have been advocating on here for quite some time now.
No doubt some of this is performative, or PR. Some of the things he is doing I don't think the majority would deem as helpful or productive, but yet its not being hidden. Is their crazier stuff that's being hidden, possibly, but doubtful since our bureaucracy is a majority left leaning, his administration is being watched more closely than any other. It's going to be very difficult to hide anything.

I don't think either side should be reflexive (good or bad) to Trumps actions, skepticism is healthy.
 
We will never agree on this topic. An opinion piece, but lays out the fact that Palestinian's have no interest in a two state solution, despite Israeli offers to do so. I think your position is the "alternate reality" that this article speaks to.

No mention of the right of return of Palestinian refugees which Israel wouldn't allow (5000 over 5 years isn't serious), or that Palestine had to be a demilitarized "state" with Israeli military installations in key parts. It was not a sovereign state, which apparently was Arafat's problem.

That said, I do think that Arafat should have accepted it and that the Palestinian people would have bitten your hand off for either the 2000 or 2008 agreements, with the latter very unlikely to have gone through in any case.

It is a pity more effort hasn't been put into electoral changes in both Gaza and the West Bank rather than propping up ($$$) both Hamas and the PLA. That's the path IMO, giving people something to live for rather than nothing to live for.
 
It is a pity more effort hasn't been put into electoral changes in both Gaza and the West Bank rather than propping up ($$$) both Hamas and the PLA. That's the path IMO, giving people something to live for rather than nothing to live for.
And abandon Sharia Law and radical Islam, which may, or may, not be part and parcel of electing different leadership.
 
And abandon Sharia Law and radical Islam, which may, or may, not be part and parcel of electing different leadership.
More like mandatory elections every 4-5 years and you get to pick your rulers and therefore laws, nobody else does. I mean, who knows what type of reactionary bat shit leadership you might get if you keep telling people what's good for them or not and what they should do or not!
 
Back
Top