whatithink
GOLD
The conditional AND is suspect to me. If De Anza's second teams are better on avg than other clubs first teams, then ECNL has a quality issue. If De Anza put in their first team, then I'd assume that it would mean that the lower clubs/teams would just perform worse, highlighting the lack of competitiveness in the league - which in turn would hardly make it attractive for a high-level team to join. If performance or some level thereof is the criteria, then ECNL should be objective and transparent. That said, it never was on the girls' side, so who knows.That's a valid point. I'm not familiar with all the NorCal clubs. How many NorCal clubs are putting up mediocre to poor standings, AND have a higher performing team they are not playing in the ECNL for each of their age groups?
Then also factor in how strong or weak a league is relative to the rest of the ECNL. It's common to see "weak" teams in the SW winning in showcase events when matched against other ECNL leagues. Likewise its common to see ECNL boys teams being beaten by non ECNL teams in showcases, so its all hit & miss.
As you say, lots of speculation, and not a lot of facts.