Bad News Thread

What’s a sexual orientation mandate? Believe in adoption? Must kneel? The “left went ape-shit” because trump was an obvious disaster starting with his American carnage speech (that was a head scratcher until he created the American carnage). You seem to be tossing some of your fears and angst into your post there.
Forget it Husker. I was talking about FB and all the hate in 2016. I got off long time ago. I saw best friends never talk again. I only care about more adoptions and less abortions. That's it. Each side thinks they knows best about sex. I say, buzz off and mind your own business. Stop it.
 
Forget it Husker. I was talking about FB and all the hate in 2016. I got off long time ago. I saw best friends never talk again. I only care about more adoptions and less abortions. That's it. Each side thinks they knows best about sex. I say, buzz off and mind your own business. Stop it.
Like my pops use to say, “just worry about yourself, stay out of other people’s business”. The people that try to tell others how they should conduct their personal lives are usually the worst kind of hypocrites.
 
Alright, 7 weeks ago we were given a 6-14 week range of Osterholm's Armageddon ("OA"). As stated last week, we have flattened out in cases and now hospitalizations are only dropping slightly. That isn't good news. However, we are nowhere near anything like OA. Deaths are still dropping like a rock, but they typically lag hospitalizations by a couple of weeks. If deaths keep dropping like this for two more weeks, I think it's pretty much done - no OA. By then we'll be at about 30% vaccinated (24.5% now). If J&J comes through in the volumes expected starting in April, we'll likely be vaccinating news folks at 1%/day. By the end of April, we'll be nearing 60% vaccinated with at least their first shot.
8 weeks into the 6-14 week range for Osterholm's Armageddon ("OA"). Cases are rising overall - driven by the northeast and upper midwest. Hospitalizations are flat with deaths still decreasing, but showing some flattening. Not great news overall, but definitely not anything close to OA yet. We have 6 more weeks to see if he knew what he was talking about and see if he should take the advice @dad4 and realize this is biology and not physics so he should stay out of the prediction business.

The fact is that the surge that is likely to occur with this new variant from England is going to happen in the next six to 14 weeks. And, if we see that happen, which my 45 years in the trenches tell me we will, we are going to see something like we have not seen yet in this country,” Osterholm said.

NYTimes Vaccine tracker has changed and appears to exclude certain states now. CDC has a nice summary I found that I actually prefer for an overall perspective. Looks like we'll be at over 30% with at least one dose by the end of March. The US is averaging over 3 million shots/day over the last 5 days. J&J is getting into the mix more now as well. It's good to see over 72% of the population over 65 is vaccinated already.


1617029946219.png
 
So @dad4 was sure bad thins would happen when TX opened up all biz and dropped masks.

We are not yet at a month yet...but getting close. Lets see what is happening so far.

The start is here.

covid_March_10_2021.png

As of today we are here.

Not much of a difference.

tx_FL_Ca_3weeksin.png

But let us take a closer look just to be sure. Dad the stat guy was sure opening biz and no more masks would lead to a spike in cases.

Lets see what the trend is.

Well cases continue to fall. Crazy right? @dad4 the guy that claims he understands stats whiffed again. Why? Because as usual he fails to look at real world data. If the model tells you one thing, but the real world data tells you another, it is time to re-evaluate.

In the end a year in, based on actual DATA we can say TX handled the crisis far better vs CA. For starters kids were in school in person all year and go from there.

dailytrend_tx.png
 
So @dad4 was sure bad thins would happen when TX opened up all biz and dropped masks.

We are not yet at a month yet...but getting close. Lets see what is happening so far.

The start is here.

View attachment 10488

As of today we are here.

Not much of a difference.

View attachment 10489

But let us take a closer look just to be sure. Dad the stat guy was sure opening biz and no more masks would lead to a spike in cases.

Lets see what the trend is.

Well cases continue to fall. Crazy right? @dad4 the guy that claims he understands stats whiffed again. Why? Because as usual he fails to look at real world data. If the model tells you one thing, but the real world data tells you another, it is time to re-evaluate.

In the end a year in, based on actual DATA we can say TX handled the crisis far better vs CA. For starters kids were in school in person all year and go from there.

View attachment 10490
No, no, no, Hound. You need to compare the third Monday of each month in the US to the second Tuesday of the prior month in the UK and the fourth Wednesday of 2 months prior for the rest of the EU. Make sure you adjust for time differences in all places, afternoon tea in the UK, siestas in Spain and the two-hour lunches in France. Then you'll see that masks are almost as effective as vaccines.
 
Since that is the group of people that have accounted for close to roughly 80% of all deaths...with them getting vaccinated, the crisis is over.
Overall, it should put the rate of death down to less than 1/3 of what it was / case.

(0.8 deaths)*(0.276 not vaccinated) + (0.2 deaths) *(0.837 not vaccinated)
0.22 + 0.17 = 0.39

However, among those < 65, It's highly likely those closer to 65 are vaccinated at a significantly higher rate and, of course, those people will have a higher mortality rate.

This does assume that those getting vaccinated and those that are not are equally likely to have a negative outcome from a case. I'm not convinced that is so.
 
So @dad4 was sure bad thins would happen when TX opened up all biz and dropped masks.

We are not yet at a month yet...but getting close. Lets see what is happening so far.

The start is here.

View attachment 10488

As of today we are here.

Not much of a difference.

View attachment 10489

But let us take a closer look just to be sure. Dad the stat guy was sure opening biz and no more masks would lead to a spike in cases.

Lets see what the trend is.

Well cases continue to fall. Crazy right? @dad4 the guy that claims he understands stats whiffed again. Why? Because as usual he fails to look at real world data. If the model tells you one thing, but the real world data tells you another, it is time to re-evaluate.

In the end a year in, based on actual DATA we can say TX handled the crisis far better vs CA. For starters kids were in school in person all year and go from there.

View attachment 10490
Would you mind not putting words in my mouth?

It is so fucking rude.

If you think I said something, go find the quote, reply to it.
 
No, no, no, Hound. You need to compare the third Monday of each month in the US to the second Tuesday of the prior month in the UK and the fourth Wednesday of 2 months prior for the rest of the EU. Make sure you adjust for time differences in all places, afternoon tea in the UK, siestas in Spain and the two-hour lunches in France. Then you'll see that masks are almost as effective as vaccines.
You could actually do some analysis instead of just mocking it, you know.

The original argument was comparing a known 70% effective mask against a 70% effective vaccine which did not yet exist.

I have not seen anyone argue that a 70% effective mask is better than a 95% effective vaccine- now that we know we have one.
 
You could actually do some analysis instead of just mocking it, you know.

The original argument was comparing a known 70% effective mask against a 70% effective vaccine which did not yet exist.

I have not seen anyone argue that a 70% effective mask is better than a 95% effective vaccine- now that we know we have one.
In fairness, I said, "almost", but J&J is about 72% effective in the US, right? Basically the same as the claim of the mask at 70%.


So, if someone is telling me this is the case, that means from the time we started mask policy in CA, if we would have replaced masks with everyone being vaccinated by the J&J shot (and given two weeks), we would expect the same number of new hospitalizations and deaths. Is that the claim?
 
In fairness, I said, "almost", but J&J is about 72% effective in the US, right? Basically the same as the claim of the mask at 70%.


So, if someone is telling me this is the case, that means from the time we started mask policy in CA, if we would have replaced masks with everyone being vaccinated by the J&J shot (and given two weeks), we would expect the same number of new hospitalizations and deaths. Is that the claim?
That’s what I thought. 70% is 70%. I was wrong.

The mask‘s 70% doesn’t apply to in home transmission. So the mask ends up acting more like a 45% reduction. (70% reduction outside the home, 0% reduction inside the home. Geometric mean gives you 45% reduction.)

To get an effective 70% with masks, you’ve have to have a solid plan to quarantine infected people outside the home. We did not have that in CA.

That said, LA managed a variant covid better than most states managed plain covid. So something was helping, and it happened too early to be the vaccine.
 
So @dad4 was sure bad thins would happen when TX opened up all biz and dropped masks.

We are not yet at a month yet...but getting close. Lets see what is happening so far.

The start is here.

View attachment 10488

As of today we are here.

Not much of a difference.

View attachment 10489

But let us take a closer look just to be sure. Dad the stat guy was sure opening biz and no more masks would lead to a spike in cases.

Lets see what the trend is.

Well cases continue to fall. Crazy right? @dad4 the guy that claims he understands stats whiffed again. Why? Because as usual he fails to look at real world data. If the model tells you one thing, but the real world data tells you another, it is time to re-evaluate.

In the end a year in, based on actual DATA we can say TX handled the crisis far better vs CA. For starters kids were in school in person all year and go from there.

View attachment 10490
Much of Texas, many, many businesses are going on with full Covid-19 precautions. Masks, social distancing and limiting occupancy. Texans aren’t stupid, but their politically motivated governor is acting like he is.
 
Much of Texas, many, many businesses are going on with full Covid-19 precautions. Masks, social distancing and limiting occupancy. Texans aren’t stupid, but their politically motivated governor is acting like he is.
I was going to comment something similar but stopped- only because what I had was just anectdotal from a friend living in San Antonio.
She is a realtor there and says all her clients still wear masks- and her neighborhood stores are mostly full of masked people too.
 
I was going to comment something similar but stopped- only because what I had was just anectdotal from a friend living in San Antonio.
She is a realtor there and says all her clients still wear masks- and her neighborhood stores are mostly full of masked people too.
My wife is there now. I have family and friends literally all over Texas and get the same reports even from the trumpiest of them.
 
I was going to comment something similar but stopped- only because what I had was just anectdotal from a friend living in San Antonio.
She is a realtor there and says all her clients still wear masks- and her neighborhood stores are mostly full of masked peo
So the bars and restaurants are not open 100%?

Trick question they are.

While many will still wear a mask, many will stop. Many biz have/will stop enforcing masks. Further they have no capacity restrictions.

And what do we see?

Declining cases.

@dad4 specifically said it was not a good idea. As we look at the numbers...the DATA tells a different story.
 
Would you mind not putting words in my mouth?

It is so fucking rude.

If you think I said something, go find the quote, reply to it.
You said it was a bad idea. Why would it be a bad idea? Increases the spread right?

What does the data show?

It shows that again your concern was misplaced.

What part of that did I get wrong?
 
Abbott is being a political twit.

He has the data on masks, he knows they work, and he repeals the mask rule anyway.

Why? He needs a distraction. Repealing a mask mandate is easier than talking about the near complete failure of the electric grid and natural gas infrastructure.

So Abbott repeals the mask rule to distract people from their broken water pipes.​
Let's save the above for future reference.

TX won't see any spike due to the mask mandate gone and everything opening up and the vaccine being out.

CA will lag again and months from now the data will show (again) that they may as well have followed FL and TX.
So above we see you think it is a bad idea.

To be fair you don't like the idea of people doing much of anything ;)

That said have we seen any spike in cases due to lifting the mask mandate or allowing restaurants, bars, biz to be at 100% capacity?

Clearly you would not have allowed it.

But now as the data comes in what do we see?

There is no issue is there, correct?
 
I calculate that the trailing 7 day daily average of cases has decreased 50% since Texas reopened 100% and removed the mask mandates (5,617 daily to 2,831). That's about the extent of my math abilities. What does the huge decrease prove? Not sure, but it certainly casts substantial doubt on the effectiveness of lockdown mandates and/or implies that vaccines may be effective.

Now, I'm sure some epidemiologist, statistician, research analyst could go into his/her controlled lab bubble and apply all sorts of tests and regression analyses to prove something entirely different, but ultimately you can't question real world results. It doesn't matter how great you are at math or studying viruses you can't change reality.
 
Back
Top