Yes you have repeatedly. You are more than welcome to correct the record and tell us what you in fact believe. But your upvotes and contrariness to certain positions speaks volumes
Bad News Thread
- Thread starter kickingandscreaming
- Start date
I thought you would cite a reference, not just repeat your opinion.
Desert Hound
DA
Hey I think just the other day you and @espola were discussing this.
The American Journal of Medicine Now Recommends HCQ for COVID19 | Principia Scientific, Intl.
The American Journal of Medicine now (Jan. 2021) recommends Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, and Zinc for the treatment of Covid 19 outpatients. The irony is this is the treatment that former US President, Donald Trump promoted last year. The timing, right after the election, is interesting...
principia-scientific.com
Nah it’s a fact. Do your own research.
You are very quick to put people into red/blue, black/white. up/down extremes. I'm not.
Thr details are interesting, and complicated. Recommended for outpatients. But in large doses it weakens the early immune response.Hey I think just the other day you and @espola were discussing this.
The American Journal of Medicine Now Recommends HCQ for COVID19 | Principia Scientific, Intl.
The American Journal of Medicine now (Jan. 2021) recommends Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, and Zinc for the treatment of Covid 19 outpatients. The irony is this is the treatment that former US President, Donald Trump promoted last year. The timing, right after the election, is interesting...principia-scientific.com
Same drug, same disease. Taken early, it hurts. Taken late, it helps.
Not really as simple as HCQ=good or HCQ=bad.
It’s a shorthand. Dad4 and I are actually relatively close on the policy we’d follow and are probably closer than dad4 and newsoms former policy.
That you don’t do it is laughable considering you were the one who found my own positions obvious. And as I’ve invited to you if you think you’ve been incorrectly classified you are more than welcome to explain to us the nuances of your position (2nd invite)
Except when I call for a national mask mandate and closing indoor dining. I assume we still differ on those.
We actually agree on indoor dining but differ on the rigorous ness and length of the closures. I think a National mask mandate would be unconstitutional but agree with masks for most indoor commercial situations but think our expectations about what they can do must be tempered
Hüsker Dü
DA
Do you nick pick the cause of death in all tragic events? How many 9/11 victims were directly murdered by the terrorists? Deaths were caused by illegal activities instigated by trump and his minions. Not to mention the thousands that needlessly died due to trumps lack of effort concerning COVID-19.
Hey I think just the other day you and @espola were discussing this.
The American Journal of Medicine Now Recommends HCQ for COVID19 | Principia Scientific, Intl.
The American Journal of Medicine now (Jan. 2021) recommends Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, and Zinc for the treatment of Covid 19 outpatients. The irony is this is the treatment that former US President, Donald Trump promoted last year. The timing, right after the election, is interesting...principia-scientific.com
I have already responded that I don't judge a person or idea based on its partisan identity. Before responding to people I don't know or making judgements on an idea, I do some background research.
Why does Grammarly prefer "judgment" over "judgement"?
Courts. The legal system uses “judgment”, and US dictionaries follow. Grammarly imports some dictionary, and gets the legal spelling along with it.
Some dictionaries now carry the word "orbisculate" just because people asked them to.
Some dictionaries now carry the word "orbisculate" just because people asked them to.
And don't get me started on "preventive" vs. "preventative".
This right here is probably the funniest thing I’ve read on these forums in a long time.
Why is that?
Even funnier.
Glitterhater
SILVER ELITE
While I think it's noble to have the idea that we shouldn't judge people based upon their opinions, I don't think as humans we are capable of that.
I think the difference is whether or not you voice your judgements out loud
I think the difference is whether or not you voice your judgements out loud
Hüsker Dü
DA
“partisan identity” to me reads like politics, as in E is saying he doesn’t judge a person or an idea based on the political slant of the source (i.e. a good idea is a good idea and a good person is a good person, and of course the contrary applies as well). Opinions are all we have to base judgement on online. We have no idea how people actually are in real life. So many people assume an alter ego online.While I think it's noble to have the idea that we shouldn't judge people based upon their opinions, I don't think as humans we are capable of that.
I think the difference is whether or not you voice your judgements out loud