Interesting article from a left newspaper. 2008 was a real black eye to the expert economic consensus, and people like Summers and Bernake. They were shown up by some scrappy outsiders. And the crisis directly led to the rise of the Sanders left and the Trumpian populist right.
If the possibility of an engineered virus lab leak moves from the possible to the probable, it may very well have another similar affect against the health expert class and another blow to the establishment rule, particularly if it turns out the US (whether through Fauci or not) had a hand in it. The avatar moves health experts from a Saint Fauci icon to Dr. Frankenstein.
The potential consequences of the origins of the virus are shattering – if they can be proved
www.theguardian.com
"Because if the hypothesis is right, it will soon start to dawn on people that our mistake was not insufficient reverence for scientists, or inadequate respect for expertise, or not enough censorship on Facebook.
It was a failure to think critically about all of the above, to understand that there is no such thing as absolute expertise. Think of all the disasters of recent years: economic neoliberalism, destructive trade policies, the Iraq War, the housing bubble, banks that are “too big to fail,” mortgage-backed securities, the Hillary Clinton campaign of 2016 — all of these disasters brought to you by the total, self-assured unanimity of the highly educated people who are supposed to know what they’re doing, plus the total complacency of the highly educated people who are supposed to be supervising them."
A major problem we have is that the press basically goes one way. So for example in the virus theory since T said it might have come from the lab, most of the press reflexively went the other way. They were concerned about sides and scoring points vs pursuing the truth.
It is unfortunate, but most of what is reported daily is done through the prism of a political point of view. And unfortunately the vast majority of the press leans heavily one way. Note: I would not want the reverse where the press leaned heavily the other way.
With the lab leak theory anyone who wondered if that actually happened were told the theory had been debunked, or they were Trumpys or just plain conspiracy theorists.
Now that it is allowable to discuss it, suddenly the press is talking about it. The fact that now they are and they were not a year ago says a lot about how the press works. They had little interest in looking at it objectively because T might be right. They were more interesting in playing gotcha vs actually investigating the origins of a virus that shut down most of the world. That seems to be a rather big story if true, and yet they spent their time telling everyone it was crazy to think it was a man made virus.
Funny how quickly things change. It may turn out to be naturally occurring in the end. But that isn't the point. They should have been digging into the story.
If one only gets their info from one side of the spectrum, they are not getting the full story. Or at a min they will lack some of the nuance of the issue. If for instance you only read the NY Times, you generally only hear reasons why taxes shouldn't be lowered, or why taxes should be increased. They never give a good overview of why there are reasons why taxes should be lowered. The reader doesn't get a full view of both sides of the issue.
And that lack of both sides of the issue relates to the false Russian angle with Trump, the lack of interest into the origins of the virus, etc.
It behooves people to read news from a range of sources to get a better understanding of issues vs reading/watching those that agree with ones point of view.