5 biological men roster wins Australian women's soccer league title & also undefeated this season

To be honest, I missed the stump humping part. I often skip chapters of your novels. Nothing personal.

When you didn't deny doing homework on tablets made of stone, I thought there might be a chance.
Of course you did.....

"Joey, you ever been in a Turkish prison?"
 
Actually..... the selfish gene theory is that (particularly as there is a higher incidence the lower birth order you go) that it does that to ensure there are others to look after the herd while not propagating in competition to the core genes. We also know from the apes that sexuality does in facct tend to be fluid, with there being both transgendered apes exhibiting behavior in the opposite gender, as well as apes that are willing to experiment with different types of intercourse (particularly if they are low T). Where you tend not to see it is with the alphas, which would also make sense under the selfish gene theory. That also makes it hard to count but up to 1/5 males seems to experiment at various points, given they have no access to females, but where there preference is is very hard to tell since they are apes and most can't talk. Sex seems > reproduction.

If people realized how much of everything is innate to our genes, and how much we are puppets to them, their heads would truly explode.
Ohh Grace 🤣 I now see where you're coming from, but I think there's a bit of a stretch happening here when we try to apply The Selfish Gene Theory to this discussion. Let’s remember what the theory is really about: survival of genes, not survival of social trends. Dawkins didn’t write his book to explain why we have cultural movements, Grace... he wrote it to explain how genes keep themselves alive and kicking. The theory is all about ensuring that genes survive and thrive through reproduction and not about making sure 20% of the population decides not to reproduce at all 😁.

You mentioned that maybe some people are genetically wired to take care of others in the "herd" without competing to pass on their own genes, which I can follow to an extent. But let's be honest here Grace, if nearly 1 in 5 people stop reproducing altogether, that’s not helping the herd survive. In fact, that’s taking a pretty big chunk of the population out of the gene pool entirely. If genes are really pulling the strings, they wouldn’t be saying, "Hey, let’s get a whole bunch of us to stop reproducing so we can watch over the rest." Right?? That doesn’t add up. The theory’s whole premise is about maximizing the chance that those genes get passed on, and that means more reproduction & not less.

Now, about the apes. Yes, some apes do quirky things when they’re isolated, stressed, or just don’t have access to females. But the thing is, they are Apes Grace, Animals not sitting around pondering their sexual identity or picking a new gender. They’re reacting to their environment, and when they finally get access to females again, you don’t see them continuing to experiment with the same sex. It’s situational, not a natural preference, and more importantly, it's not a model we can base human sexuality on. We’re a little more complex than that, and while we can learn from animal behavior, it’s not a perfect mirror for human society.

As for the historical references like the Romans and their habits, I’ll give you that some cultures were more permissive about same sex behavior. But again, that's cultural, not genetic. The fact that Romans indulged in certain behaviors doesn’t prove that it’s all innate. It just shows that societal norms can have a big impact on how people behave. Just because Romans didn’t care much about who was sleeping with whom doesn’t mean that 10% of their population was biologically programmed to prefer same sex relationships. The difference in numbers across various cultures actually supports my point Grace...it’s largely about how society frames these behaviors.

So, while I agree that some of our behavior is influenced by genetics, the massive uptick in LGBTQ identification today seems more driven by external factors such as social media, social trends, and progressive government policies rather than by a sudden shift in our genes. If The Selfish Gene Theory were really running the show, the last thing it would want is 20% of the population taking itself out of the reproductive game. That’s just not how genetic survival works. So, sure Grace there’s some fluidity in humans and apes, but to the extent we’re seeing today? SMH That’s a different story, and it’s not one written by our DNA.
 
Who said I'm mad? I feel sorry for morons that put tampons in the boy's bathroom. They're the same morons that say males can menstruate and give birth. Honestly, I feel sorry for them, because they're mentally ill. More importantly, I feel sorry for society because those people vote and shouldn't.
So you haven’t read the bill… come on, you can do it. I believe in you. Break free from the bubble and actually find out what it says, not what Russian troll farms tell you it says.
 
Ohh Grace 🤣 I now see where you're coming from, but I think there's a bit of a stretch happening here when we try to apply The Selfish Gene Theory to this discussion. Let’s remember what the theory is really about: survival of genes, not survival of social trends. Dawkins didn’t write his book to explain why we have cultural movements, Grace... he wrote it to explain how genes keep themselves alive and kicking. The theory is all about ensuring that genes survive and thrive through reproduction and not about making sure 20% of the population decides not to reproduce at all 😁.

You mentioned that maybe some people are genetically wired to take care of others in the "herd" without competing to pass on their own genes, which I can follow to an extent. But let's be honest here Grace, if nearly 1 in 5 people stop reproducing altogether, that’s not helping the herd survive. In fact, that’s taking a pretty big chunk of the population out of the gene pool entirely. If genes are really pulling the strings, they wouldn’t be saying, "Hey, let’s get a whole bunch of us to stop reproducing so we can watch over the rest." Right?? That doesn’t add up. The theory’s whole premise is about maximizing the chance that those genes get passed on, and that means more reproduction & not less.

Now, about the apes. Yes, some apes do quirky things when they’re isolated, stressed, or just don’t have access to females. But the thing is, they are Apes Grace, Animals not sitting around pondering their sexual identity or picking a new gender. They’re reacting to their environment, and when they finally get access to females again, you don’t see them continuing to experiment with the same sex. It’s situational, not a natural preference, and more importantly, it's not a model we can base human sexuality on. We’re a little more complex than that, and while we can learn from animal behavior, it’s not a perfect mirror for human society.

As for the historical references like the Romans and their habits, I’ll give you that some cultures were more permissive about same sex behavior. But again, that's cultural, not genetic. The fact that Romans indulged in certain behaviors doesn’t prove that it’s all innate. It just shows that societal norms can have a big impact on how people behave. Just because Romans didn’t care much about who was sleeping with whom doesn’t mean that 10% of their population was biologically programmed to prefer same sex relationships. The difference in numbers across various cultures actually supports my point Grace...it’s largely about how society frames these behaviors.

So, while I agree that some of our behavior is influenced by genetics, the massive uptick in LGBTQ identification today seems more driven by external factors such as social media, social trends, and progressive government policies rather than by a sudden shift in our genes. If The Selfish Gene Theory were really running the show, the last thing it would want is 20% of the population taking itself out of the reproductive game. That’s just not how genetic survival works. So, sure Grace there’s some fluidity in humans and apes, but to the extent we’re seeing today? SMH That’s a different story, and it’s not one written by our DNA.
Do Apes have MTFs?
 
Ohh Grace 🤣 I now see where you're coming from, but I think there's a bit of a stretch happening here when we try to apply The Selfish Gene Theory to this discussion. Let’s remember what the theory is really about: survival of genes, not survival of social trends. Dawkins didn’t write his book to explain why we have cultural movements, Grace... he wrote it to explain how genes keep themselves alive and kicking. The theory is all about ensuring that genes survive and thrive through reproduction and not about making sure 20% of the population decides not to reproduce at all 😁.

You mentioned that maybe some people are genetically wired to take care of others in the "herd" without competing to pass on their own genes, which I can follow to an extent. But let's be honest here Grace, if nearly 1 in 5 people stop reproducing altogether, that’s not helping the herd survive. In fact, that’s taking a pretty big chunk of the population out of the gene pool entirely. If genes are really pulling the strings, they wouldn’t be saying, "Hey, let’s get a whole bunch of us to stop reproducing so we can watch over the rest." Right?? That doesn’t add up. The theory’s whole premise is about maximizing the chance that those genes get passed on, and that means more reproduction & not less.

Now, about the apes. Yes, some apes do quirky things when they’re isolated, stressed, or just don’t have access to females. But the thing is, they are Apes Grace, Animals not sitting around pondering their sexual identity or picking a new gender. They’re reacting to their environment, and when they finally get access to females again, you don’t see them continuing to experiment with the same sex. It’s situational, not a natural preference, and more importantly, it's not a model we can base human sexuality on. We’re a little more complex than that, and while we can learn from animal behavior, it’s not a perfect mirror for human society.

As for the historical references like the Romans and their habits, I’ll give you that some cultures were more permissive about same sex behavior. But again, that's cultural, not genetic. The fact that Romans indulged in certain behaviors doesn’t prove that it’s all innate. It just shows that societal norms can have a big impact on how people behave. Just because Romans didn’t care much about who was sleeping with whom doesn’t mean that 10% of their population was biologically programmed to prefer same sex relationships. The difference in numbers across various cultures actually supports my point Grace...it’s largely about how society frames these behaviors.

So, while I agree that some of our behavior is influenced by genetics, the massive uptick in LGBTQ identification today seems more driven by external factors such as social media, social trends, and progressive government policies rather than by a sudden shift in our genes. If The Selfish Gene Theory were really running the show, the last thing it would want is 20% of the population taking itself out of the reproductive game. That’s just not how genetic survival works. So, sure Grace there’s some fluidity in humans and apes, but to the extent we’re seeing today? SMH That’s a different story, and it’s not one written by our DNA.
Actually....there'd been a radical decline in fertility for the younger millenials and the zers. Also incidents of males with low testosterone (so-called beta males) seem to be rising. Further, there seems to be an increasing disconnected between men and women with women delaying pregnancy later and later and more men becoming incels (indeed, more than trans individuals, incels seem to be the prevalent factor in school shootings including the latest one in Georgia). We have a beta male problem....why? The rising trend in LGBTQ identification goes alone with that trend....BTW that B is the tricky factor which seems most susceptible to societal norms. If you look at the trend in Romans who were exclusively G v. B, the number was much lower...whether this was because of machismo norms or because of something in the society who knows....there are few apes that are G or T...1/5 that have experimented with B. But something is afoot, especially if you read dating twitter. Lots of women complaining about low T men and wondering why all of a sudden they are in their late 30s without a husband. Lots of incel men complaining they can't get a gal. Something's up with the selfish gene.
 
Do Apes have MTFs?
Nope, Crush 🤣, apes aren’t signing up for MTF transitions like we humans do SMH. What we see in apes is more like them just going with the flow, reacting to social situations rather than heading to a gender clinic. For example, some apes might act in ways more commonly associated with the opposite sex bossing others around or pulling some wild mating rituals but let’s be real, they’re not transitioning or shopping for new wardrobes while trying to hide their pistols in the process 😂. They’re just dealing with their environment and social vibes, not questioning their internal gender identity.

Now, this kind of “go with what you’ve got” behavior reminds me of what happens in male prisons. The uptick in same sex behavior behind bars isn’t exactly about men suddenly discovering they’re gay, it’s more like, "Hey, there’s no women here, so... options are limited." Once out of jail, many of these guys go back to dating women. So it’s more about survival of the fittest relationship edition than an innate sexual orientation switch. Kind of like how apes adapt to their surroundings.

In both cases, whether it’s apes in the wild or men in prison, it’s really just about playing the hand you’re dealt. These behaviors are circumstantial, not necessarily a lifelong preference. So just because you see certain behaviors in certain environments doesn’t mean it’s nature at work it’s more like, "This is the situation, so let’s roll with it." In other words, the environment can really make you do some interesting things whether you’re an ape having gay sex or a guy in a Tranny costume.
 
Actually....there'd been a radical decline in fertility for the younger millenials and the zers. Also incidents of males with low testosterone (so-called beta males) seem to be rising. Further, there seems to be an increasing disconnected between men and women with women delaying pregnancy later and later and more men becoming incels (indeed, more than trans individuals, incels seem to be the prevalent factor in school shootings including the latest one in Georgia). We have a beta male problem....why? The rising trend in LGBTQ identification goes alone with that trend....BTW that B is the tricky factor which seems most susceptible to societal norms. If you look at the trend in Romans who were exclusively G v. B, the number was much lower...whether this was because of machismo norms or because of something in the society who knows....there are few apes that are G or T...1/5 that have experimented with B. But something is afoot, especially if you read dating twitter. Lots of women complaining about low T men and wondering why all of a sudden they are in their late 30s without a husband. Lots of incel men complaining they can't get a gal. Something's up with the selfish gene.
p.s. that disconnect also spills into political affiliation. Single women are record high with the Ds. Equally single men are record high with the Rs. If Increasingly people don't want to date across the aisles...can't remember the exact numbers but IIRC it was from 20 something% in the 1970s to 45% now. That makes for a whole lot of complainy cat ladies wondering why they can't get the ring, and a whole lot of angry young men wondering why they are incels. Women are the gatekeepers of sex. Men are the gatekeepers of relationships.
 
Actually....there'd been a radical decline in fertility for the younger millenials and the zers. Also incidents of males with low testosterone (so-called beta males) seem to be rising. Further, there seems to be an increasing disconnected between men and women with women delaying pregnancy later and later and more men becoming incels (indeed, more than trans individuals, incels seem to be the prevalent factor in school shootings including the latest one in Georgia). We have a beta male problem....why? The rising trend in LGBTQ identification goes alone with that trend....BTW that B is the tricky factor which seems most susceptible to societal norms. If you look at the trend in Romans who were exclusively G v. B, the number was much lower...whether this was because of machismo norms or because of something in the society who knows....there are few apes that are G or T...1/5 that have experimented with B. But something is afoot, especially if you read dating twitter. Lots of women complaining about low T men and wondering why all of a sudden they are in their late 30s without a husband. Lots of incel men complaining they can't get a gal. Something's up with the selfish gene.
Do you think the WEF, Klause, Bill Gates, Clintons, Obamas and the Elites they buy off want more people born and alive on the planet or less, like depopulation through abortion and wars and the jabs? Based on what I read and see, these assholes and the one's they bought off to push the jabs are respoisble for all this MTF stuff. I think without a link, that the jabs were tainted with a high level of beta male hormones. I think we all agree that a man with a penis shall not play women sports. A man who cuts off penis, can apply for access. If you have a penis, no entry to girl's bathroom or girl sports.
 
Nope, Crush 🤣, apes aren’t signing up for MTF transitions like we humans do SMH. What we see in apes is more like them just going with the flow, reacting to social situations rather than heading to a gender clinic. For example, some apes might act in ways more commonly associated with the opposite sex bossing others around or pulling some wild mating rituals but let’s be real, they’re not transitioning or shopping for new wardrobes while trying to hide their pistols in the process 😂. They’re just dealing with their environment and social vibes, not questioning their internal gender identity.

Now, this kind of “go with what you’ve got” behavior reminds me of what happens in male prisons. The uptick in same sex behavior behind bars isn’t exactly about men suddenly discovering they’re gay, it’s more like, "Hey, there’s no women here, so... options are limited." Once out of jail, many of these guys go back to dating women. So it’s more about survival of the fittest relationship edition than an innate sexual orientation switch. Kind of like how apes adapt to their surroundings.

In both cases, whether it’s apes in the wild or men in prison, it’s really just about playing the hand you’re dealt. These behaviors are circumstantial, not necessarily a lifelong preference. So just because you see certain behaviors in certain environments doesn’t mean it’s nature at work it’s more like, "This is the situation, so let’s roll with it." In other words, the environment can really make you do some interesting things whether you’re an ape having gay sex or a guy in a Tranny costume.
Thanks for information on the reality of prison life. Of course, Shawshank was no real redemption in my mind. I would have been thrown off the roof if I knew Bogs and Rooster were waiting for me every night. That Warden was the devil. Anyway, I hear Big Foot is now a woman and is packing her pistol in da woods.
1726182788762.png
 
Nope, Crush 🤣, apes aren’t signing up for MTF transitions like we humans do SMH. What we see in apes is more like them just going with the flow, reacting to social situations rather than heading to a gender clinic. For example, some apes might act in ways more commonly associated with the opposite sex bossing others around or pulling some wild mating rituals but let’s be real, they’re not transitioning or shopping for new wardrobes while trying to hide their pistols in the process 😂. They’re just dealing with their environment and social vibes, not questioning their internal gender identity.

Now, this kind of “go with what you’ve got” behavior reminds me of what happens in male prisons. The uptick in same sex behavior behind bars isn’t exactly about men suddenly discovering they’re gay, it’s more like, "Hey, there’s no women here, so... options are limited." Once out of jail, many of these guys go back to dating women. So it’s more about survival of the fittest relationship edition than an innate sexual orientation switch. Kind of like how apes adapt to their surroundings.

In both cases, whether it’s apes in the wild or men in prison, it’s really just about playing the hand you’re dealt. These behaviors are circumstantial, not necessarily a lifelong preference. So just because you see certain behaviors in certain environments doesn’t mean it’s nature at work it’s more like, "This is the situation, so let’s roll with it." In other words, the environment can really make you do some interesting things whether you’re an ape having gay sex or a guy in a Tranny costume.
It's more than just social. Environment too as seen in the behavior of certain species such as clownfish, hyenas, reptiles and certain cranes.

There also, however, seems to be a genetic component as the alpha is not the one engaging in the behavior, and it seems to be keyed to testosterone levels (which in turn is influenced by genetic, social and environmental factors)

Again it's the B which is tricky. The Gs (which do exist in the ape world as well) seem much more rigid and just constitute a much more generally lower %.
 
What makes you think I'm a father that trusts a relative? I'm not disagreeing with you. It could also be a coach, a teacher, a priest, a babysitter, etc. I'm not willing to wake up one morning and say it's suddenly okay for men to use the women's restroom. There's always some level of risk when your kid is unsupervised, but when Jack Black puts on a chiffon dress and walks around in public, that doesn't spell "sane" to me at all.

If Jack wants to put in a full day at work and then go home, put on a moo-moo, wig and dance to Lady Gaga songs in the mirror, that's his business. When he wants to pretend he's Jane and use the women's bathroom, that's an issue and should be.
I don't think that. I was just making a point about relativity. I don't doubt you have the best interests of your kids in mind.

What's the fear of drag queens, or what's the inherent issue with them? As long as their schtick is age appropriate, I wouldn't have a big issue with them doing story time. Drag is a form of comedy. Milton Berle and Flip Wilson we're well known for their drag characters. Would I have Divine perform for kids? no, but I don't think we should lump all acts together.
 
It's more than just social. Environment too as seen in the behavior of certain species such as clownfish, hyenas, reptiles and certain cranes.

There also, however, seems to be a genetic component as the alpha is not the one engaging in the behavior, and it seems to be keyed to testosterone levels (which in turn is influenced by genetic, social and environmental factors)

Again it's the B which is tricky. The Gs (which do exist in the ape world as well) seem much more rigid and just constitute a much more generally lower %.
I just looked on google and it says Apes go both ways and some on the men only like other Ape men. I have no idea and if that's true, were just being like the apes then.

1726183127754.png
 
I don't think that. I was just making a point about relativity. I don't doubt you have the best interests of your kids in mind.

What's the fear of drag queens, or what's the inherent issue with them? As long as their schtick is age appropriate, I wouldn't have a big issue with them doing story time. Drag is a form of comedy. Milton Berle and Flip Wilson we're well known for their drag characters. Would I have Divine perform for kids? no, but I don't think we should lump all acts together.
How old you thinking? My old pal who used to be an Elder but got shamed and booted because his son Sam came as a gay. Not a Trans at all, just likes to do Drag Queen shows at adult bars, keyword adult. He would never do a drag queen story time with little 7 year olds at a school. It's pure comedy with the adults and the booze, but not for kids. Drag Queen story time is not for the children.

No!!!

1726183750134.png
 
I don't think that. I was just making a point about relativity. I don't doubt you have the best interests of your kids in mind.

What's the fear of drag queens, or what's the inherent issue with them? As long as their schtick is age appropriate, I wouldn't have a big issue with them doing story time. Drag is a form of comedy. Milton Berle and Flip Wilson we're well known for their drag characters. Would I have Divine perform for kids? no, but I don't think we should lump all acts together.
1. There’s a sexual component to it. It would be like doing a “stripper time story hour” but the stripper is just doing g rated stuff. Why do you need the stripper…just read the goddamn story
2. Yes I get drag is a thing which has been important in gay culture. Drag artists are not necessarily trans individuals. They tend to be gay men in drag (though some are trans and just pre decision).
3. I’ve never really been comfortable though with drag for drags sake. It’s kinda like blackface…a not so flattering caricature of women.
4. That said you wanna do drag go ahead. But I get the discomfort because of 1 with it around kids. Even more disturbing is the drag show (and strip shows like pole dancing) for kids since the dances overt have a sexual component
 
I just looked on google and it says Apes go both ways and some on the men only like other Ape men. I have no idea and if that's true, were just being like the apes then.

View attachment 23160
Watch out with Google suggestive articles, follow the publishing path and you'll normally see it lead back to a progressive study. Some liber arts dude not a real scientist. Probably some leftist social scientist. What you are describing here are false genetic mutations directly caused by stressors in the environment. Did I ever tell you Crush that I have a bachelors in Biology? 😂
 
Last edited:
1. There’s a sexual component to it. It would be like doing a “stripper time story hour” but the stripper is just doing g rated stuff. Why do you need the stripper…just read the goddamn story
2. Yes I get drag is a thing which has been important in gay culture. Drag artists are not necessarily trans individuals. They tend to be gay men in drag (though some are trans and just pre decision).
3. I’ve never really been comfortable though with drag for drags sake. It’s kinda like blackface…a not so flattering caricature of women.
4. That said you wanna do drag go ahead. But I get the discomfort because of 1 with it around kids. Even more disturbing is the drag show (and strip shows like pole dancing) for kids since the dances overt have a sexual component
When I was a kid either the Liberian, our teacher or one of the parents would read story time, not a Drag Queen. This is all about grooming the next thing you know a Stripper Story Time reader will come, and it will be G rated the first time. Then PG13 and then.......
 
Back
Top