5 biological men roster wins Australian women's soccer league title & also undefeated this season

If you read what I wrote, crush, I actually agree. The ideal rule would be penis or no penis (MTF can use women's after surgery, FTM can't use women's after surgery). But it's more complicated than that:
1. You don't get to ignore what the law is currently and use violence to take it into your own hands (small pun).
2. I also care about the 8 year old boy in the bathroom with John the Pervert, or the FTM, MTF or nonbinary getting harassed in their respective biological bathroom.
3. So that assumes we make an effort to make more single stalls available through mandates. It helps not only the people undergoing issues, but also parents to make sure their kids are safe. We did this for mobility impaired people and it's a reasonable accommodation.
4. I wouldn't put out the bathroom police TSA South Park style to check everyone's junk going into the bathroom. However, if a crime is committed, it would be an accelerator to the offense and a means for police to remove bad actors.
What if a little boy, say 8 went in the boys bathroom and then Papa bear followed right behind. What should Papa bear do if young man was trolling little kids and sugar daddies and anyone else interest in seeing his exposed weapon? That's the issue. Some men are rapists, MAPs, Pedos and we just don't know, and they come from all walks. A dude wearing a dress, and a beard is being stopped and asked to turn around (if my daughter is in there). He can wait until she comes out. That's what Slobo was sharing you guys. You took something and lied. Shame on you.
 
What if a little boy, say 8 went in the boys bathroom and then Papa bear followed right behind. What should Papa bear do if young man was trolling little kids and sugar daddies and anyone else interest in seeing his exposed weapon? That's the issue. Some men are rapists, MAPs, Pedos and we just don't know, and they come from all walks. A dude wearing a dress, and a beard is being stopped and asked to turn around (if my daughter is in there). He can wait until she comes out. That's what Slobo was sharing you guys. You took something and lied. Shame on you.
1. In your example, the person in question is actively doing something both wrong and illegal.
2. I care just as much about the dad that has to let his daughter go into the bathroom by herself or the mom that has to let her son go into the bathroom by himself. Both situations concern me, not just 1.
3. "He can wait until she comes out". It's the opposite. You concerned, it is permissible in CA law to follow and make sure nothing happens....there is no magical legal barrier preventing you from entering if you perceive a threat to look out for your kid. You still concerned, you take her and leave.
 
This video is great... How can you argue with PBD.

Summary​

The meeting transcript discusses a confrontation between two social media influencers, Patrick Bette David (PBD) and Graham Stephen, regarding the LGBT movement and its influence on education. PBD argues that the LGBT worldview is being actively promoted in schools, while traditional Christian values and teachings are being removed. He presents statistics showing a significant increase in the percentage of younger generations identifying as LGBTQ, suggesting that this is a result of manipulation and influence rather than innate identity. PBD challenges Graham to choose between having his children learn about God and Christianity or the LGBT worldview in schools, emphasizing that these two worldviews are incompatible and that one must be chosen over the other. The discussion touches on topics such as the influence of media and social pressure on young people's identities, the role of religion in education, and the potential harm of exposing children to explicit sexual content at a young age. Overall, the meeting transcript highlights the ongoing debate and tension between traditional religious values and the progressive LGBT movement, particularly in the context of education.

Chapters​

Introduction and Context​

The meeting begins with an unknown speaker providing context for the video being discussed. The speaker introduces the two influencers, Patrick Bette David (PBD) and Graham Stephen, and explains that PBD is confronting Graham on the LGBT movement and the Bible. The speaker notes that while PBD has some views that they may disagree with, he makes some compelling points in the video.

00:00:25PBD's Hypothetical Question​

PBD presents a hypothetical scenario to Graham, asking him to choose between having his children learn about God and Christianity or the LGBT worldview in schools. PBD frames this as a choice between two incompatible worldviews, forcing Graham to take a stance. Graham struggles to provide a clear answer, which PBD sees as a problem.

00:02:04Questioning Graham's Sexuality​

PBD then directly asks Graham if he is gay, and when Graham says no, PBD questions whether Graham could be influenced to become gay, just as Graham was influenced to become a real estate agent. This line of questioning is intended to challenge the idea that sexual orientation is innate and not influenced by external factors.

00:03:24Generational Differences in LGBT Identification​

PBD presents statistics showing that the percentage of people identifying as LGBTQ has increased significantly across younger generations, with 21% of Gen Z identifying as LGBTQ. He argues that this suggests the younger generations are more susceptible to manipulation and influence, in contrast with the older, more traditional generations.

00:05:21PBD's Critique of Graham's Neutrality​

PBD criticizes Graham for not taking a clear stance on the issue, arguing that there is no neutrality and that one must choose between the traditional Christian worldview and the progressive LGBT worldview. He suggests that Graham's inability to clearly differentiate between the two is a problem.

00:08:32Conclusion and Calls to Action​

The speaker concludes the video by emphasizing the importance of removing children from public schools due to the promotion of the LGBT worldview, and calls for people to make a clear decision about which worldview they will support. The speaker also encourages viewers to pray for the individuals mentioned in the video and to support the ministries linked in the description.

Action Items​

  • 00:08:46 Get your kids out of public schools as fast as possible to protect their spiritual future.
  • 00:09:00 Make a clear decision about which worldview you will support, as there is no neutrality between traditional Christianity and the progressive LGBT worldview.
  • 00:09:16 Pray for the individuals mentioned in the video and support the ministries linked in the description.
 
This video is great... How can you argue with PBD.

Summary​

The meeting transcript discusses a confrontation between two social media influencers, Patrick Bette David (PBD) and Graham Stephen, regarding the LGBT movement and its influence on education. PBD argues that the LGBT worldview is being actively promoted in schools, while traditional Christian values and teachings are being removed. He presents statistics showing a significant increase in the percentage of younger generations identifying as LGBTQ, suggesting that this is a result of manipulation and influence rather than innate identity. PBD challenges Graham to choose between having his children learn about God and Christianity or the LGBT worldview in schools, emphasizing that these two worldviews are incompatible and that one must be chosen over the other. The discussion touches on topics such as the influence of media and social pressure on young people's identities, the role of religion in education, and the potential harm of exposing children to explicit sexual content at a young age. Overall, the meeting transcript highlights the ongoing debate and tension between traditional religious values and the progressive LGBT movement, particularly in the context of education.

Chapters​

Introduction and Context​

The meeting begins with an unknown speaker providing context for the video being discussed. The speaker introduces the two influencers, Patrick Bette David (PBD) and Graham Stephen, and explains that PBD is confronting Graham on the LGBT movement and the Bible. The speaker notes that while PBD has some views that they may disagree with, he makes some compelling points in the video.

00:00:25PBD's Hypothetical Question​

PBD presents a hypothetical scenario to Graham, asking him to choose between having his children learn about God and Christianity or the LGBT worldview in schools. PBD frames this as a choice between two incompatible worldviews, forcing Graham to take a stance. Graham struggles to provide a clear answer, which PBD sees as a problem.

00:02:04Questioning Graham's Sexuality​

PBD then directly asks Graham if he is gay, and when Graham says no, PBD questions whether Graham could be influenced to become gay, just as Graham was influenced to become a real estate agent. This line of questioning is intended to challenge the idea that sexual orientation is innate and not influenced by external factors.

00:03:24Generational Differences in LGBT Identification​

PBD presents statistics showing that the percentage of people identifying as LGBTQ has increased significantly across younger generations, with 21% of Gen Z identifying as LGBTQ. He argues that this suggests the younger generations are more susceptible to manipulation and influence, in contrast with the older, more traditional generations.

00:05:21PBD's Critique of Graham's Neutrality​

PBD criticizes Graham for not taking a clear stance on the issue, arguing that there is no neutrality and that one must choose between the traditional Christian worldview and the progressive LGBT worldview. He suggests that Graham's inability to clearly differentiate between the two is a problem.

00:08:32Conclusion and Calls to Action​

The speaker concludes the video by emphasizing the importance of removing children from public schools due to the promotion of the LGBT worldview, and calls for people to make a clear decision about which worldview they will support. The speaker also encourages viewers to pray for the individuals mentioned in the video and to support the ministries linked in the description.

Action Items​

  • 00:08:46 Get your kids out of public schools as fast as possible to protect their spiritual future.
  • 00:09:00 Make a clear decision about which worldview you will support, as there is no neutrality between traditional Christianity and the progressive LGBT worldview.
  • 00:09:16 Pray for the individuals mentioned in the video and support the ministries linked in the description.
I see we have reached the anti-LGB part of the conversation, so forgive some of us if we think anti-gay soft bigotry is part of the equation here. As I stated before, lots of men speaking for women here....few actual women....I know plenty of women who don't think there should be mtf in women's sports but somehow I doubt they'd go as far as some of you are going.
 
I see we have reached the anti-LGB part of the conversation, so forgive some of us if we think anti-gay soft bigotry is part of the equation here. As I stated before, lots of men speaking for women here....few actual women....I know plenty of women who don't think there should be mtf in women's sports but somehow I doubt they'd go as far as some of you are going.
You should watch the video Grace before saying he’s against gays. He’s not. He claims to have gay coworkers and friends. He claims that gen z has been indoctrinated as over 21% identify within the 🏳️‍🌈 spectrum and that is no result of natural evolution
 
No, and I'd win that....I see we have moved onto the "women should be seen and not heard" portion of the agenda.


Physician heal thyself first! Again, I'm not the one with bigotry and anger issues.
I totally support you being heard... but not by me.
 
You should watch the video Grace before saying he’s against gays. He’s not. He claims to have gay coworkers and friends. He claims that gen z has been indoctrinated as over 21% identify within the 🏳️‍🌈 spectrum and that is no result of natural evolution
“there is no neutrality and one must chose between the traditional Christian world view and the progressive lgbt worldview”. Pass.

Ps I don’t doubt social contagion is a thing. Social contagion is esp bad when it comes to the t since those changes are drastic as opposed to just getting your rump stumped. But that doesn’t mean there aren’t people who are legit born that way either….because of their brains.
 
“there is no neutrality and one must chose between the traditional Christian world view and the progressive lgbt worldview”. Pass.

Ps I don’t doubt social contagion is a thing. Social contagion is esp bad when it comes to the t since those changes are drastic as opposed to just getting your rump stumped. But that doesn’t mean there aren’t people who are legit born that way either….because of their brains.

I agree that there are legit people born that way as the stats say it for the previous gens. But it’s more than likely less than 1% are born and the other 19% have been indoctrinated by our progressive government. You can’t deny the numbers… ask the Obamas 🤔
 
I agree that there are legit people born that way as the stats say it for the previous gens. But it’s more than likely less than 1% are born and the other 19% have been indoctrinated by our progressive government. You can’t deny the numbers…

If you look at the history of other cultures (and it may vary based on the genetic pool as well as societal norms), specifically the Roman strumping of youths and slaves, it seems to be somewhere between 3%-10%. It wasn’t rare (rumors circulated to harm Octavian that he was Julius patron) but also not uncommon. And a rough count of the whore houses on the aventine seems to support closer to 10%.
 
Meh. No great loss. The tough guy hiding behind his anonymity bragging about how he’ll beat up the “tyrannies”. I’m not missing much.
Relax, grandma... nobody said they were beating up trannies. I said they'd be leaving the bathroom.

P.S. - Everyone here is anonymous... including you. I'm not sure why you keep throwing that around like it's relevant.
 
If you look at the history of other cultures (and it may vary based on the genetic pool as well as societal norms), specifically the Roman strumping of youths and slaves, it seems to be somewhere between 3%-10%. It wasn’t rare (rumors circulated to harm Octavian that he was Julius patron) but also not uncommon. And a rough count of the whore houses on the aventine seems to support closer to 10%.
Ps it’s hard to measure since a bit of the function tends to be correlated to the permissiveness and acceptance in the society. The number was close to zero in Aztec society but then the Aztecs punished it brutally. In Mayan society it seems to have been much more prevalent. The Romans we know didn’t care (very much)…the sniggered and bullied at the types which may have held the numbers down but were generally permissive so might be a good reference point for numbers occurring in nature.
 
Pro DD? What's complex about saying there needs to be tampons in the boy's bathroom? Is that for boys that wiping too hard?

You can't justify his bullshit. Stolen valor and tampons for buttholes. Believe it or not, that almost makes more sense than supporting the candidate that lied about doing the ONE job she was assigned to do and supports whatever the winds tell her gets the most votes.

I'm ALREADY starting to feel unburdened by what has been.

I mean, you're not even slightly curious as to what the actual facts are? It's just a couple of clicks away out here in the real world. You seem super stressed about Tampon Tim and his "tampons for buttholes", but it would take like 10 seconds to step away from Truth Social and Google it, and you could then knock that one off your rage list.

This screenshot is from last week's election interference indictment against Russia. Join the dots.
 

Attachments

  • 2024-09-12_14-29-45.jpg
    2024-09-12_14-29-45.jpg
    138.8 KB · Views: 2
Relax, grandma... nobody said they were beating up trannies. I said they'd be leaving the bathroom.

P.S. - Everyone here is anonymous... including you. I'm not sure why you keep throwing that around like it's relevant.
“Leaving the bathroom” by force if they refused. So noble.
 
If you look at the history of other cultures (and it may vary based on the genetic pool as well as societal norms), specifically the Roman strumping of youths and slaves, it seems to be somewhere between 3%-10%. It wasn’t rare (rumors circulated to harm Octavian that he was Julius patron) but also not uncommon. And a rough count of the whore houses on the aventine seems to support closer to 10%.
Were you ever forced to do battle in the Colosseum?
 
Ps it’s hard to measure since a bit of the function tends to be correlated to the permissiveness and acceptance in the society. The number was close to zero in Aztec society but then the Aztecs punished it brutally. In Mayan society it seems to have been much more prevalent. The Romans we know didn’t care (very much)…the sniggered and bullied at the types which may have held the numbers down but were generally permissive so might be a good reference point for numbers occurring in nature.
The old nature vs nurture argument is tough to decipher. You need to be very careful sighting stuff from progressive scholars. I’d go back maybe 20 years and research these numbers before the woke scholars took over the new progressive universities.
 
The old nature vs nurture argument is tough to decipher. You need to be very careful sighting stuff from progressive scholars. I’d go back maybe 20 years and research these numbers before the woke scholars took over the new progressive universities.
Totally fair point. But I’ve been on the expeditions myself (Roman history is a hobby of mine and my Harvard educated goddaughter is an archeologist specializing in the period). Hard numbers are questionable. But it’s very clearly in the realm of more rare, less than common. I mean it was enough that it was a meme in 1950s sword and toga movies.

“Joey do you like gladiator movies?”
 
Back
Top