5 biological men roster wins Australian women's soccer league title & also undefeated this season

Reading comp. The law you said the trans person is breaking is that men are required to use the men's room, and women the women's room, and you can't use the other. That law doesn't exist in California. The law you'd be breaking is felony assault and battery with a hate crime and civil rights violation accelerator.

Yes you are hiding tough guy. Tell us who you are if you believe you are so strongly in the right and if you are proud of your positions.

Your bigotry is the implication that trans people ("grown men") are all in there to target kids. That's disgusting.


Then this should be a problem too, no?

Tell us who you are? LMFAO! Why? Do you think you know me?

Men's restrooms are for men. That's why they have urinals in there. If you have to hike your skirt up in the front, to take a leak, you're a dude. It's been that way a long time. Maybe not when YOU were a little girl... but at least the last few hundreds of years.

My implication? I never implied trans people are all in there to target kids. Stop being a drama queen. Do you need THAT much attention?
 
How come you clowns always miss the part where I say they can leave by choice?

I don't give a FUCK what the prosecutor would call it. I can't make it any more clear than that. We already have enough prosecutors that make sure criminals have more rights than victims. I believe a certain party calls those people "voters".
Because you'll have a subset of people who will tell you "no". The fact you demanded they leave isn't a legal defense. Again, situation I outlined....guy with dog ptsd asks a blind person with a guide dog to leave the medical waiting room, blind guy refuses to leave, guy with dog ptsd beats him. That's not a legal defense.
 
Tell us who you are? LMFAO! Why? Do you think you know me?

Men's restrooms are for men. That's why they have urinals in there. If you have to hike your skirt up in the front, to take a leak, you're a dude. It's been that way a long time. Maybe not when YOU were a little girl... but at least the last few hundreds of years.

My implication? I never implied trans people are all in there to target kids. Stop being a drama queen. Do you need THAT much attention?
Tough guy hiding behind his anonymity. So proud of his positions. Don't believe it for a second.
 
Notice it’s all men here, with the classic slurs and threats of violence. Not your wives and daughters. It’s fascinating. Makes me wonder if the true motivation is not “protect the wives and daughters” but rather something else…that’s something that makes me go “hmmmmm”
That's because you don't actually read what people write. You regurgitate what you want the narrative to be. I'm talking about protecting children and you turn that into beating up trans people. I guess that's why all your posts are novels. Takes awhile to turn an opinion into your agenda.
 
Because you'll have a subset of people who will tell you "no". The fact you demanded they leave isn't a legal defense. Again, situation I outlined....guy with dog ptsd asks a blind person with a guide dog to leave the medical waiting room, blind guy refuses to leave, guy with dog ptsd beats him. That's not a legal defense.
Men aren't allowed in the women's restroom. It's always been that way. A wig and you feeling "womanly" that day doesn't change the facts.
 
Tough guy hiding behind his anonymity. So proud of his positions. Don't believe it for a second.
The world is full of guys that would do the right thing. Protecting a child is the right thing. Nobody cares what you believe.

Why do you think you're that important?
 
That's because you don't actually read what people right. You regurgitate what you want the narrative to be. I'm talking about protecting children and you turn that into beating up trans people. I guess that's why all your posts are novels. Takes awhile to turn an opinion into your agenda.
That's not what you wrote. You said if a dude in a dress that looks like a man goes into the bathroom you'd ask them to leave. If they didn't you'd beat them up. You did not say...if some random guy (whether he's in a dress or not) enters the women's room where my daughter is and proceeds to leer at her in her stall, I'd defend her. The former is some person not breaking the law and minding their own business and you not liking it. The correct solution there, as I told you before, is to leave and find another bathroom if you are uncomfortable. The latter is an entirely different situation where the person is committing a crime on a minor. But you can't help it, because you are a bigot (you led off this conversation on page 1 with a slur), so your bigotry is constantly leaking (and note no I'm not sweeping in everyone under the bigotry label...others have shown themselves more thoughtful and when it's a bridge too far for them)
 
Can you name 1 person that thinks it's okay for a man to walk in the women's restroom without putting a "closed for cleaning" sign and a mop in his hands?

Again, simpleton, there's a distinction between "okay" and "illegal". It's not a crime in California, unless the person enters into the rest room with intent to do some other harm. Say for example you had two small bathrooms, men's and women's, next to each other. The women's room overflows so the woman decides to go into the men's room. Not a crime. And BTW plenty of women have been known to do that in emergency conditions when the line is too long in the women's room or the bathroom is out of order.
 
Again, simpleton, there's a distinction between "okay" and "illegal". It's not a crime in California, unless the person enters into the rest room with intent to do some other harm. Say for example you had two small bathrooms, men's and women's, next to each other. The women's room overflows so the woman decides to go into the men's room. Not a crime. And BTW plenty of women have been known to do that in emergency conditions when the line is too long in the women's room or the bathroom is out of order.
Again, another babbling novel from you.

It's amazing how you deflect. I asked another, 'simpleton' question I thought you could answer.

Name the law and you couldn't. Name 1 person and you couldn't. There's a pattern here, isn't there?
 
Again, another babbling novel from you.

It's amazing how you deflect. I asked another, 'simpleton' question I thought you could answer.

Name the law and you couldn't. Name 1 person and you couldn't. There's a pattern here, isn't there?
Again, I can't prove a negative. Google it. The law prohibiting men from using the women's room and women from using the men's room doesn't exist in California.

And as to the "name 1 person" again the question turns "for what purpose". Have seen (and been) plenty of women in emergency conditions using the men's room.

Simpleton.
 
Back
Top