In the immortal words of James Hetfield, “sad but true”...And I will say that if your child wants to play soccer in college at the highest level, they need to be able to handle that style of play. Or get recruited by UCLA or Stanford.
In the immortal words of James Hetfield, “sad but true”...And I will say that if your child wants to play soccer in college at the highest level, they need to be able to handle that style of play. Or get recruited by UCLA or Stanford.
We played a Texas team last year and it was definitely an eye opener, observing the parents, it was easy to see where the players learned their style of play.I will say that the Texas teams have a certain style that he may or may not be referring to....
Keep in mind that FC Dallas only has one loss all season even though it has played 10 games against top 10 teams. And we shouldn't expect this ranking to match playoffs and wildcards. That's the point of the RPI - to look beyond wins, ties and losses. But your observation is a good one that my RPI might be a little too heavily weighted toward strength of schedule (and thus isn't as good of a predictor of a game's outcome as it should be). I'm seeing that trend too. I figured out what I need to do to refine it, but now just need to find the time to update the model. Thanks for the comment.It is interesting that your rankings based on RPI do not match up with the standings for Playoffs and Wildcards. For example LAFC Slammers is in first place in the standings and went 3-0 in NC while you have FC Dallas in first place who went 0-1-2 in NC. The eagles (my dd team) is shown in 41st place when we are 30th in the standings. We have not played LAFC yet so when we play those two games, even if we lose our RPI will go up since they get added to our strength of schedule. I believe that RPI is too dependent upon the perceived strength of schedule of your opponents without considering how you actually perform against them. Personally I would stick to showing the standings that actually count.
I also agree that the Southwest conference overall did not show well in NC. It will be interesting to see if this flips for the Summer Showcase and everyone else has to deal with our perfect weather.
It is interesting that your rankings based on RPI do not match up with the standings for Playoffs and Wildcards. For example LAFC Slammers is in first place in the standings and went 3-0 in NC while you have FC Dallas in first place who went 0-1-2 in NC. The eagles (my dd team) is shown in 41st place when we are 30th in the standings. We have not played LAFC yet so when we play those two games, even if we lose our RPI will go up since they get added to our strength of schedule. I believe that RPI is too dependent upon the perceived strength of schedule of your opponents without considering how you actually perform against them. Personally I would stick to showing the standings that actually count.
I also agree that the Southwest conference overall did not show well in NC. It will be interesting to see if this flips for the Summer Showcase and everyone else has to deal with our perfect weather.
Forum rule #1 : 90% of the time your child’s team loses, the other team played kickball, kick and run, direct, long ball — you choose the term.
Though I like the build from the back ball control style of play the bottom line is to do what it takes to win.
FC Dallas was the best team we saw last year at the top 04 level...that's playing Arsenal, Surf, NoCal and moreKeep in mind that FC Dallas only has one loss all season even though it has played 10 games against top 10 teams. And we shouldn't expect this ranking to match playoffs and wildcards. That's the point of the RPI - to look beyond wins, ties and losses. But your observation is a good one that my RPI might be a little too heavily weighted toward strength of schedule (and thus isn't as good of a predictor of a game's outcome as it should be). I'm seeing that trend too. I figured out what I need to do to refine it, but now just need to find the time to update the model. Thanks for the comment.
Agree but 75% of the RPI has nothing to with how your team performs. That’s weighted too much and there are plenty of articles out there that agree.Figuring in the influence of the Strength of schedule component is the point of the RPI.
In college, the pros or internationally that is true. In the Girls DEVELOPMENT Academy I would think that the point is to develop. You are confirming that you bought into a lie knowing that it was a lie. Sounds a lot like Congress.....
I agree RPI has its flaws. For example, the NCAA's RPI formula (the same one I used) would have placed UCLA Women's Soccer 5th last season. https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/soccer-women/d1/ncaa-womens-soccer-rpi But no rational person would say UCLA should have been ranked behind South Carolina (which was 8th in the final coach's poll).Agree but 75% of the RPI has nothing to with how your team performs. That’s weighted too much and there are plenty of articles out there that agree.
You missed my point (or maybe I didn’t make it). My point was that you need a team and players to develop so that they can play any style. A big part of development is learning to play and play against all styles.
Agree but 75% of the RPI has nothing to with how your team performs. That’s weighted too much and there are plenty of articles out there that agree.