Vaccine

espola said:
When the plane took off, there was an implicit agreement on what the onboard conditions would be. Changing those conditions mid-flight is unfair and likely to lead to a consumer lawsuit. You can't get off the plane midflight.
Click to expand...

I can understand you point, but couldn't you make the same argument for someone who wanted to take their mask off? If the mandate changed during flight and they did not allow passengers to remove their mask, couldn't those people have a lawsuit as well?

The real problem is so many people are uneducated and don't really know what is going on
 
espola said:
When the plane took off, there was an implicit agreement on what the onboard conditions would be. Changing those conditions mid-flight is unfair and likely to lead to a consumer lawsuit. You can't get off the plane midflight.
Click to expand...
Well only an asshole would sue and if they did there is no basis for damages. Feeling uncomfortable is not sufficient to claim damages.
 
www.bitchute.com

Gilbert Gottfried told everyone vaccination was a matter of life and death. He was right. He died.

He pushed and advertised for mass vaccination sites that were open. All of these murder shills for the NWO and the Illuminati that die from these genocidal covid shots, good. I hope they burn in hell for convincing people to take this shit shot. Source: Fat News. More videos you might want to...
www.bitchute.com www.bitchute.com

The video is interesting take from Gilbert. I do not wish anyone to burn in hell. That's the dude who made the video comment, not mine, fyi
 
espola said:
In most states, and probably in the US Courts that would have jurisdiction over events occurring in interstate travel, emotional distress is adequate grounds for a lawsuit.
Click to expand...

Keyword being "emotional" - it is the principled foundation to all you lefties lunacy.
 
espola said:
When the plane took off, there was an implicit agreement on what the onboard conditions would be. Changing those conditions mid-flight is unfair and likely to lead to a consumer lawsuit. You can't get off the plane midflight.
Click to expand...

Does this include at the time every ticket was purchased, genius?
 
watfly said:
I wouldn't recommend that you take that case on contingency. You can thank me later.
Click to expand...

In my non-legal opinion, hiring a lawyer who can write the appropriate letter will result in a settlement in which the airline pays the lawyer for his time and the offended party gets something that cost the airline essentially nothing, like first-class upgrades on a few future flights.
 
watfly said:
Well only an asshole would sue and if they did there is no basis for damages. Feeling uncomfortable is not sufficient to claim damages.
Click to expand...
The mask rule changed because of a lawsuit, too.

To me, it’s all a sign that we are allowing administrators and judges to write the laws, instead of congress. Not a good trend. At least in theory, we can vote out a congressman or a president. Nothing we can do when a judge or justice decides he should be in charge.
 
dad4 said:
The mask rule changed because of a lawsuit, too.

To me, it’s all a sign that we are allowing administrators and judges to write the laws, instead of congress. Not a good trend. At least in theory, we can vote out a congressman or a president. Nothing we can do when a judge or justice decides he should be in charge.
Click to expand...

Or when you let a governor hold emergency powers for over 2 years
 
dad4 said:
The mask rule changed because of a lawsuit, too.

To me, it’s all a sign that we are allowing administrators and judges to write the laws, instead of congress. Not a good trend. At least in theory, we can vote out a congressman or a president. Nothing we can do when a judge or justice decides he should be in charge.
Click to expand...
The mandate wasn't a law, and that's what the judge ruled on. The CDC isn't supposed to inact laws, therefore the mandate wasn't legal. Or at least that's what this ignorant bystander got out of it.......
 
dad4 said:
The mask rule changed because of a lawsuit, too.

To me, it’s all a sign that we are allowing administrators and judges to write the laws, instead of congress. Not a good trend. At least in theory, we can vote out a congressman or a president. Nothing we can do when a judge or justice decides he should be in charge.
Click to expand...
I'm not in favor of activist judges either but that's hardly the case here. The judge ruled the mask mandate on travel was "arbitrary and capricious". That was a pretty low bar for the plaintiff to prove and a difficult case for the defendant to defend given the overall inconsistency in various restrictions implemented by the Federal government. Like I said before the burden of proof should be on those imposing the restrictions and not to those objecting.
 
dad4 said:
To me, it’s all a sign that we are allowing administrators and judges to write the laws, instead of congress.
Click to expand...
If anything the judge is saying if you want to make these rules it has to be passed through congress. An agency simply does not have the power to make these broad decisions.

Judge is saying do it the right way if you want a mask mandate on public transportation. That means going through the house, the senate and then having the prez sign it into law.
 
GoldenGate said:
Uh, what's the death rate in your state again? Why is it that the 10 states with the highest death rates are Mississippi, Arizona, Alabama, Tennessee, West Virginia, Arkansas, New Jersey (which is dropping like a stone compared to your anti-mask/vax states btw), Louisiana, Michigan, and Oklahoma?
Click to expand...
Clinging to old news like a life raft…….stay thirsty!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top