Vaccine

I’m not arguing anything about this first impeachment other than espola was wrong in his characterization.

I do have an opinion and think the second was wrong. He didn’t order the mob to seize the capitol. He told them to go home. There’s nothing in his words that would suggest an order towards violent insurrection as opposed to loud but peaceful protest. I think you could impeach him for delaying calls to shut down the thing once it turned violent but then you’d have to hoist Pelosi and the capitol police for being woefully unprepared and poorly executing the response (in some cases with police welcoming in the protestors into the capitol). if he ordered or told pence to overrule the election I think you could do it for that too but you’d need pence to testify. Finally Idont Think you can impeach him after the fact…once he left office it was done. Also just becausecertain behavior isn’t impeachable doesn’t mean it’s not awful.

you’ve gone over to your buddies and gone full troll haven’t you? How far you’ve fallen from the thoughtful, mild mannered yet fearful guy from 2020. Covid really did a number on you.
Trump was pressured to tell the mob to go home. Left to his own devices I don't think he ever would have. He was loving the fact that his supporters would storm the Capitol for him.
 
Trump was pressured to tell the mob to go home. Left to his own devices I don't think he ever would have. He was loving the fact that his supporters would storm the Capitol for him.
Agree. But that’s not what was alleged (a sort of willful and knowing negligence) but was alleged was that he invited an insurrection (which the facts simply don’t show). They could have charged him before he left office as you said but again it would require some testimony from those around him and would have raised uncomfortable questions about the office of capitol police. And again, just because you don’t have the evidence to impeach him doesn’t mean it wasn’t morally wrong. The legal political and moral are all different things.
 
I’m not going to go down this rabbit hole with you again. We’ve already litigated this. I don’t have much interest in rehashing old conversations about what is now history. Much of it is opinion which you are free to disagree with.
Now you are just trying to distract from the fact that you were wrong.

"Litigated"?

I already admitted that you were correct.

Now you can admit that t was the worst thing that ever happened to the GOP (and after Nixon and Agnew that's a true accomplishment)
 
Agree. But that’s not what was alleged (a sort of willful and knowing negligence) but was alleged was that he invited an insurrection (which the facts simply don’t show). They could have charged him before he left office as you said but again it would require some testimony from those around him and would have raised uncomfortable questions about the office of capitol police. And again, just because you don’t have the evidence to impeach him doesn’t mean it wasn’t morally wrong. The legal political and moral are all different things.
“You gotta fight like hell or you won’t have a country!”
 
"Litigated"?

I already admitted that you were correct.

Now you can admit that t was the worst thing that ever happened to the GOP (and after Nixon and Agnew that's a true accomplishment)
You forgot hoover

I disagree he was the worst. I certainly think he was flawed. The politics of the 20th century were elites on the outside trying to supplant the white shoe often racist oligarchs of the white shoe republicans. See auntie Maime for a representation. The politics of the 21st century are the peons rebelling against the meritocratic elites. That rebellion has taken place on the left and right. Romney/Clinton/bushes are the archetypes of what they are rebelling against. Trumps use to the gop is he advances this dynamic. I agree he was also severely flawed.
 
Agree. But that’s not what was alleged (a sort of willful and knowing negligence) but was alleged was that he invited an insurrection (which the facts simply don’t show). They could have charged him before he left office as you said but again it would require some testimony from those around him and would have raised uncomfortable questions about the office of capitol police. And again, just because you don’t have the evidence to impeach him doesn’t mean it wasn’t morally wrong. The legal political and moral are all different things.
The biggest issue I have about the 2nd impeachment is the "trial" was done before the investigation. Flies in the face of the concept of innocent until proven guilty.
 
You forgot hoover

I disagree he was the worst. I certainly think he was flawed. The politics of the 20th century were elites on the outside trying to supplant the white shoe often racist oligarchs of the white shoe republicans. See auntie Maime for a representation. The politics of the 21st century are the peons rebelling against the meritocratic elites. That rebellion has taken place on the left and right. Romney/Clinton/bushes are the archetypes of what they are rebelling against. Trumps use to the gop is he advances this dynamic. I agree he was also severely flawed.

Harding was worse than Hoover. Hoover was an honest man of principles in office at the wrong time.

T was the worst President ever. His most fervent supporters (sons, daughter, Rudy, pillowguy) are all now laughingstocks.
 
“Stay in the street and get more confrontational”

In 2018, Democrat Rep. Maxine Watters said she had “no sympathy” for Trump administration officials who defended Trump’s “zero tolerance” immigration policy. She urged her supporters to “absolutely harass them” when appearing in public.

“They’re not going to be able to go to a restaurant, they’re not going to be able to stop at a gas station, they’re not going to be able to shop at a department store,” Waters said at the time. “The people are going to turn on them, they’re going to protest, they’re going to absolutely harass them.”

On March 20, 2018, Joe Biden told supporters he would have taken then-President Trump “behind the gym and beat the hell out of him” if they were in high school.
 
I have to laugh at the "lab leak debunked" supporter is now using obstruction as a basis for "there must be something to hide". What a worthless, partisan troll.

I don't belong to any political party, a decision I reached after trying out several. My partisanship position is anti-trumpist. What's yours?
 
Last edited:
The biggest issue I have about the 2nd impeachment is the "trial" was done before the investigation. Flies in the face of the concept of innocent until proven guilty.
They were rushed. They couldn’t make the deadline before he left office. They didn’t want it clogging up Biden’s first 100 days.
 
Biden could certainly use a Trump impeachment trial right now

maybe They can impeach him again

Why bother? The DOJ and NY AG are giving him enough trouble. There is a possibility that the "richest President ever" may need to beg a judge for a Public Defender.
 
I’m not arguing anything about this first impeachment other than espola was wrong in his characterization.

I do have an opinion and think the second was wrong. He didn’t order the mob to seize the capitol. He told them to go home. There’s nothing in his words that would suggest an order towards violent insurrection as opposed to loud but peaceful protest. I think you could impeach him for delaying calls to shut down the thing once it turned violent but then you’d have to hoist Pelosi and the capitol police for being woefully unprepared and poorly executing the response (in some cases with police welcoming in the protestors into the capitol). if he ordered or told pence to overrule the election I think you could do it for that too but you’d need pence to testify. Finally Idont Think you can impeach him after the fact…once he left office it was done. Also just becausecertain behavior isn’t impeachable doesn’t mean it’s not awful.

you’ve gone over to your buddies and gone full troll haven’t you? How far you’ve fallen from the thoughtful, mild mannered yet fearful guy from 2020. Covid really did a number on you.
He got "Coviditist" and now is a full member of the Covidians.
You forgot hoover

I disagree he was the worst. I certainly think he was flawed. The politics of the 20th century were elites on the outside trying to supplant the white shoe often racist oligarchs of the white shoe republicans. See auntie Maime for a representation. The politics of the 21st century are the peons rebelling against the meritocratic elites. That rebellion has taken place on the left and right. Romney/Clinton/bushes are the archetypes of what they are rebelling against. Trumps use to the gop is he advances this dynamic. I agree he was also severely flawed.
Grace T, were all flawed, let's be fair to Mr. Trump. At least with T, we all saw his flaws out in the open. These people were dealing with, they have no heart and do not play by the rules. They hide & lie all the time and will spy on you and even kill you to STFU!!! They cheat too. They treat women and kids like shit and as pawns. Horrible people we've dealing with on the this planet. I love you Grace T. The TRUTH might come out on Presidents Day :) Notice no more mask or jab talk? I talked to a buddy today and he's already back to normal. He acts as if nothing took place the last 5 years. High up in health field and boy let me tell you, he's double his income. His wife and him made over $700,000 in 2021 and he thinks he might hit $1,000,000 this year. He told me to move out of the state. He loves me and thinks I'm better off in Texas. He took three shots by Wuhan and two flu shots in last year in half. Dude is not the same. He used to be sick once or twice a year for a few days. Guess what? He's been sick so many times I lost count. His last episode was over 10 days. He's fighting the truth so much because he wants normal.
 
Why bother? The DOJ and NY AG are giving him enough trouble. There is a possibility that the "richest President ever" may need to beg a judge for a Public Defender.
Bill Gates says Covid risks have ‘dramatically reduced’ but another pandemic is coming

Bill Gates/Net worth
131.4 billion USD

He's coming out with a new "beyond meat" burger that is beyond anything anyone has ingested into their body before. Metaverse is waiting to take you. What a planet to be on right now. Freedom or Metaverse. Love or Hate. Light or Darkness.
 
Last edited:
How many "details" did you get wrong here?

"
He didn’t order the mob to seize the capitol. He told them to go home. There’s nothing in his words that would suggest an order towards violent insurrection as opposed to loud but peaceful protest. I think you could impeach him for delaying calls to shut down the thing once it turned violent but then you’d have to hoist Pelosi and the capitol police for being woefully unprepared and poorly executing the response (in some cases with police welcoming in the protestors into the capitol). if he ordered or told pence to overrule the election I think you could do it for that too but you’d need pence to testify. Finally Idont Think you can impeach him after the fact…once he left office it was done. Also just becausecertain behavior isn’t impeachable doesn’t mean it’s not awful.
"

It's just one part of the ongoing lawfare but in this context interesting that just yesterday a judge ruled in the ongoing civil conspiracy suit re several 1/6 figures that Trump (but not Jr. , Guilliani, Brooks, etc) remains on the hook:

"Immediately before directing them to the Capitol, he told rally-goers that they would need to “fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.” When those supporters did “fight like hell,” just as he had told them to, the President did not demand they act “peacefully and patriotically.” He instead tweeted that “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country.”.....These other statements by the President stand in stark contrast to his passing observation that rally-goers would soon be “peacefully and patriotically” marching to the Capitol."

so, at least for Trump, this heads to discovery. To which, re civil conspiracy, the judge noted.

"....the President’s confidant, Roger Stone. Stone posted on Parler in late December that he had met with the President “to ensure that Donald Trump continues as our president.” Shortly thereafter, Stone spoke with Tarrio, and later he used the Oath Keepers as his security detail for the January 6 Rally. The court does not rely on these allegations to establish the President’s knowledge of the Proud Boys or the Oath Keepers. Other alleged facts make that inference plausible. That said, Stone’s connections to both the President and these groups in the days leading up to January 6th is a well-pleaded fact. Discovery might prove that connection to be an important one."

 
Back
Top