thirteenknots
SILVER ELITE
Columnist for the LA Times.
Was anti vaxxed at first. Now?
Your mainstream press at work.
View attachment 12642
To imply that Trump plotted anything as such is
absolutely 100% an " Adam Espola Schiff "...!
Columnist for the LA Times.
Was anti vaxxed at first. Now?
Your mainstream press at work.
View attachment 12642
The authors and I both know the difference between “proven false” and “unproven”.
This is a case of unproven. Grace was trying to make it sound like “proven false”, but got tripped up on her middle school math.
We are talking about people, not dry brush.You're thinking is still 3 dimensional. You are playing 2d chess when what is required is 3 because you are always neglecting the factor of time. The peak, time to peak, and area under the curve does not matter at all. We've divorced death and hospitalization from cases thanks to the vaccine (yeah, I know it's no perfect. It would be better if the old people got their boosters). Hospitals are not in danger of collapse. Staffing problems are in huge part due to our continued insane policies dedicated to COVID 0. The ONLY thing you are doing by interfering with an otherwise natural process is pushing things out to a future date and prolonging the emergency.
In April of 2020 I noted that the best analogy for all this is a forest fire. It's still the best analogy. The only thing you are doing is leaving a bunch of dry brush ready for another inferno to burn again
What we should be doing, given the radical impact on hospitalizations, is boosting the over sixty crowd. You want a mandate? Mandate it for that group instead of the group that least benefits from it (children) in the insane continuing pursuit of COVID 0
"Khan isn't used to thinking in 3 dimensions. While he might command a starship, he is not a starship captain"
Not if you read "real journalists". Although, I am still waiting for @dad4 to identify them.If there were studies that showed they actually worked, the news would be hammering it home all day long.
The other reason is that while lab results appear to show at least some level of efficacy of masking - something many Covidians cling to - lab results don't account for human behavior in terms of both how masks are worn by the public and how behavior may be modified by being "masked" where the those who are masked interact more than they would if they weren't masked.If there were studies that showed they actually worked, the news would be hammering it home all day long.
What we get time and time again is "inconclusive".
The reason?
Surgical masks were not and are not designed to stop respiratory viruses.
We have hundreds of millions of people using masks throughout the world over the past couple of years and yet we don't find conclusive studies showing surgical masks do anything to stop the spread.
1. you and I both know what I meant. You are being a bombastic prick (you've lost all right to complain about ads) for someone who has been shown to have a limited thought process, and you know it. I'm not trying to be mathematically precise (don't care...it's not important). It was a reduction of point six from the percentage rate of one to the other from two small starting numbers.We are talking about people, not dry brush.
And, if you insist on a forest fire analogy, you are suggesting we do an uncontrolled burn in mid summer with no spare fire suppression capacity.
![]()
Covid-19 Hospitalizations Reported in U.S. Hit New High
The nation’s seven-day average reached 140,576, federal government data show, more than the previous high recorded during the surge last winter.www.wsj.com
ps- The whole 2 dim/3 dim thing is just you bragging. You might want to brush up on your percentages first. It sounds kind of lame when you tell me how awesome you are just after you messed up a middle school math problem.
The ad, in this case, is unarguable. Your take on the UK study was completely wrong, and it was wrong because of a middle school math error.Hah the subtle insult again from the guy always decrying the ads. You are such a hypocrite.
In any case, you've been given 2 years to prove your theories. The best so far is a flawed Bangladesh study that didn't even shown any benefit to cloth masks.
Next!
Dad, come on man. I want you to cross over to the side of the TRUTH. Honestly and I mean this, and please answer this question(s) with honesty. I love it when people give it to me straight. Here are my curiosity questions floating in my little brain.The ad, in this case, is unarguable. Your take on the UK study was completely wrong, and it was wrong because of a middle school math error.
Now stop patting yourself on the back and boasting about how awesome you are. It just reminds me of 6th grade boys talking big as they hide their tests under their binders.
The ad, in this case, is unarguable. Your take on the UK study was completely wrong, and it was wrong because of a middle school math error.
Now stop patting yourself on the back and boasting about how awesome you are. It just reminds me of 6th grade boys talking big as they hide their tests under their binders.
Well, it is a 0.6 percent change in attendance, right? I suggest that to avoid confusion when presenting to the general public, it is best to use that instead of a percent of a percent since the size of basis is unambiguous - all students. The smaller the basis the more prone it is to making noise appear significant. In the extreme, consider two classes of 100 students where 1 student is absent from one class and 2 from the other. The difference in attendance is 1% while the difference in absences is 100%.Not 0.6 percent. 0.6 percentage point. Out of a total of 3.6 percentage points.
That is a 16.7 percent change in absences. Not too shabby.
Triple Vax and double masked Dr. W today in costume. You guys, this is not funny any more. My freedom has been stolen from folks like this, Dad, The Husler, EOTL and Espola. They did this because they hate t and his followers and those who might support one of t's agenda's. I'm for adoptions. I want more and more kids born and not used as experiments. This is nothing you guys. I don;t share any truths with most of you because you can;t handle the TRUTH. However, I bet that most of you have a heart and once the TRUTH comes out, you will puke and feel depressed and probably a little guilty for turning a blind eye to the TRUTH. The TRUTH hurts, that's why bad people run from the TRUTH and straight to darkness. Darkness was easy to find in the past but now no more. The light will expose everything. Emails and text is gold!!!!
View attachment 12648
Some actual sanity. About freaking time.
![]()
Athletes Who Had COVID Will Be Considered ‘Fully Vaccinated,’ NCAA Says in New Guidelines
The NCAA's new COVID-19 guidance for winter sports contained some huge news.fee.org
all this does is buy the athletes 90 days. After the 90 days starts all over.Some actual sanity. About freaking time.
![]()
Athletes Who Had COVID Will Be Considered ‘Fully Vaccinated,’ NCAA Says in New Guidelines
The NCAA's new COVID-19 guidance for winter sports contained some huge news.fee.org
That was satire dummy. We were all born into slavery. You, me, Kicker 2.0, Espola and the rest of the best. It was only one Doc that just lied through his teeth and spoke lie all day and night and all the time about this and that and had so much oil to rub on the rich dad's backs that rich dad got what he paid for. Sicko Golden Gate. Life has brought you to the sewer. Welcome aboard brah!!! No life is better then anyone else's life. Dr. Fraud is the biggest liar ever and don;t forget that.Yup, we stole your freedom. We and a cabal of youth soccer DOCs took everything from you.
And per usual that is the problem with dad as to how he frames it.In the extreme, consider two classes of 100 students where 1 student is absent from one class and 2 from the other. The difference in attendance is 1% while the difference in absences is 100%.