Bad News Thread

from the emails it’s pretty clear fauci encouraged the idea it would go away. The masks, border closure, lockdowns, vaccines, stimulus 1…none of it was trumps idea. You can’t have it both ways: either he’s a moron incapable of a rational thought in which case he was largely listening to what they (including his son in law) were telling him, or he’s a mad genius that came up with all this stuff and fauci was asleep at the wheel. You can say he followed the advice reluctantly and doing what he could to undermine it but it was only his responsibility in a buck stops here sort of way (the same way Biden has now missed his own vaccination goals)

Did your uncle-in-law tell you about the emails or did you read them all yourself?
 
very little of the response has been rational. It’s been political, fearful, or just plain guessed at. Remember they’d been planning a response to this for years. They tore up the playbook and decided to go China lite (which failed everywhere in the world….only China like seemed to work or turning your border into an island fortress).
That’s the narrative you were fed, and swallowed whole.
 
“Politicians did”? Lol! Please, you crack me up with your myopic viewpoint.
Maybe so, but if you think that public schools didn't reopen this past fall for health reasons, and not political reasons, I suggest you do some more research. I'd recommend you look into the American Academy of Pediatrics and National Academy of Medicine recommendations last year vs. UTLA and SDUSD pronouncements. Particularly the timing of the school unions pronouncements in relation to Newsom's declaration regarding continued school closures.
 
Maybe so, but if you think that public schools didn't reopen this past fall for health reasons, and not political reasons, I suggest you do some more research. I'd recommend you look into the American Academy of Pediatrics and National Academy of Medicine recommendations last year vs. UTLA and SDUSD pronouncements. Particularly the timing of the school unions pronouncements in relation to Newsom's declaration regarding continued school closures.
Who fuels the decisions? 73 mil listened to 1 man, a political hack. The rest it’s a mix with a high dose of experts sprinkled in. Are saying there is no political push from the “it’s a hoax””it’s not that bad””it will over by Easter” anti-vax crowd? Mistakes are made on both sides but prefer those that err on the side of protection with an eye to the overall good, or is that to lovey dovey for you?
 
There are certainly some far righties that are anti-vax. In those southern states you also have a higher percentage of minorities which are really behind in vaccinations. There is also lower socio-economic communities in those areas which I also suspect have lower vaccinations rates due to less access to healthcare and often don't seek out healthcare as regularly as higher socioeconomic groups. In the mountain states they tend to be more independent and suspicious of government.

Not sure how you resolve this, but these states certainly need to do a better of encouraging there citizens to be vaccinated. Of course, people do have the choice to assume risk.
 
Who fuels the decisions? 73 mil listened to 1 man, a political hack. The rest it’s a mix with a high dose of experts sprinkled in. Are saying there is no political push from the “it’s a hoax””it’s not that bad””it will over by Easter” anti-vax crowd? Mistakes are made on both sides but prefer those that err on the side of protection with an eye to the overall good, or is that to lovey dovey for you?
I suggest you take a look at the sources I mentioned, it will give you a better understanding of the concept of "overall good". My whole point all along is that not reopening schools was not for the overall good. Myopic is only considering Covid outcomes.
 
There is nothing humorous about your ignorance and naïveté.

In my experience trolls generally fall into 2 forms of people: 1) people who are trying to be funny since they find conflict humorous and amuse themselves the way a boy would by disturbing an ant hill, or 2) generally unpleasant people who are inadequate in other aspects of their lives and so seek to obtain a modicum of standing/power online. If you are the first, you are a woeful failure at it (which makes your line stunningly lacking in any introspection). If the second, hah! good job being you....that blue pill must be mighty tasty.
 
I would add...do you want to play the blue state vs. red state game with deaths per capita? Death, vaccines and other Covid outcomes are primarily demographic related and not political. I know the article is enticing clickbait for a partisan, but it is hardly based in reality.
 
In my experience trolls generally fall into 2 forms of people: 1) people who are trying to be funny since they find conflict humorous and amuse themselves the way a boy would by disturbing an ant hill, or 2) generally unpleasant people who are inadequate in other aspects of their lives and so seek to obtain a modicum of standing/power online. If you are the first, you are a woeful failure at it (which makes your line stunningly lacking in any introspection). If the second, hah! good job being you....that blue pill must be mighty tasty.
Hopefully I qualify under 1).
 

That's interesting seeing as the opposite is happening elsewhere.

SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation (publishing.service.gov.uk)
 
In my experience trolls generally fall into 2 forms of people: 1) people who are trying to be funny since they find conflict humorous and amuse themselves the way a boy would by disturbing an ant hill, or 2) generally unpleasant people who are inadequate in other aspects of their lives and so seek to obtain a modicum of standing/power online. If you are the first, you are a woeful failure at it (which makes your line stunningly lacking in any introspection). If the second, hah! good job being you....that blue pill must be mighty tasty.

On just about any measuring scale, people can be divided into two types -- those who can be placed on one of the two sides, and those who can't.
 
In my experience trolls generally fall into 2 forms of people: 1) people who are trying to be funny since they find conflict humorous and amuse themselves the way a boy would by disturbing an ant hill, or 2) generally unpleasant people who are inadequate in other aspects of their lives and so seek to obtain a modicum of standing/power online. If you are the first, you are a woeful failure at it (which makes your line stunningly lacking in any introspection). If the second, hah! good job being you....that blue pill must be mighty tasty.
You have issues, not my issue.
 
Back
Top