The specifics must include long established rules regarding a "need to know". Once you leave your government position, you no longer have "need to know" access to do your job at CNN. Please continue. Too bad you didn't "pull back just in time" before making yourself look stupid.John Bolton almost blew it --
“A number of people have commented that he [Brennan] couldn’t be in the position he’s in, of criticizing President Trump and his so-called collusion with Russia, unless he did use classified information."
But he pulled back just in time --
“But I don’t know the specifics.”
The specifics must include long established rules regarding a "need to know". Once you leave your government position, you no longer have "need to know" access to do your job at CNN. Please continue. Too bad you didn't "pull back just in time" before making yourself look stupid.
This is priceless.The specifics must include long established rules regarding a "need to know". Once you leave your government position, you no longer have "need to know" access to do your job at CNN. Please continue. Too bad you didn't "pull back just in time" before making yourself look stupid.
This is priceless.
Because Im clever.Why do you say "priceless"?
Because Im clever.
So bitter.No, you're not.
So pretentious.So bitter.
So bitter.
So pretentious.
Many folks, as they age, lose their filters.I'm just being honest.
Many folks as they age, lose their filters.
Honest can be subjective.
It can also be delusional.
"Just being honest"....No lies or insults, right?
"Just being honest"....
And if the shoe fits...
Interesting since you're not that much older than I am...Ageism is the curious offshoot of racism where the propagators attack the class they hope to become.
What part of Brennans job at CNN requires the kind of clearance that was revoked?You have that almost backward. The clearance is given without reference to any specific information. After that, any information supplied to a cleared person is on a "need-to-know" basis.
What level clearance is needed to be a recruiter?
Interesting since you're not that much older than I am...
Facts are facts...as folks age they lose filters that make allow them to be considered civil
One persons "attack" is another's discussion.
What one describes as an attack maybe their arrogant inability to have civil conversation...
![]()