The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

The t knows whether or not he made racist comments during out-takes of the Apprentice. He also knows that there are tapes of everything he said.
 
Partisan Commie Sympathizer.


  • Commander of Bin Laden raid: Revoke my security clearance too, Mr. President


Commander of Bin Laden raid: Revoke my security clearance too, Mr. President
AllahpunditPosted at 4:41 pm on August 16, 2018


62aae413-ee54-4b71-ac7a-5deb848035e2.jpg

Can’t say I’m looking forward to the debate over whether Admiral McRaven is a globalist traitor.


But I’m sure it’s coming whether I’m looking forward to it or not.



He’s a SEAL who once served on Team Six and later commanded it for the Bin Laden raid so go figure that he’d hit hard:

Former CIA director John Brennan, whose security clearance you revoked on Wednesday, is one of the finest public servants I have ever known. Few Americans have done more to protect this country than John. He is a man of unparalleled integrity, whose honesty and character have never been in question, except by those who don’t know him.

Therefore, I would consider it an honor if you would revoke my security clearance as well, so I can add my name to the list of men and women who have spoken up against your presidency…

Through your actions, you have embarrassed us in the eyes of our children, humiliated us on the world stage and, worst of all, divided us as a nation.

If you think for a moment that your McCarthy-era tactics will suppress the voices of criticism, you are sadly mistaken. The criticism will continue until you become the leader we prayed you would be.

If he feels that strongly, why doesn’t he just forfeit his clearance? Clearly he’s trying to jump-start a movement among natsec pros in Brennan’s defense, a little collective action to deter POTUS from punishing any other critics. That might do it.

The problem with forfeiting his clearance, I guess, is that it would be a gesture aimed at shaming Trump and … he just can’t be shamed. It’s the same reason why no members of the administration have resigned in protest over anything he’s said or done, up to and including regular whipping boys like Jeff Sessions. He wouldn’t be embarrassed if they quit, he’d be glad to have the opportunity to rotate new people in. If you want to make him squirm a little, you do what McRaven did here: Dare him to take action himself. If he does it, then you can claim martyrdom. If he doesn’t do it, he looks like a wimp.

I figure the odds of POTUS actually revoking McRaven’s clearance are around 20 percent, with a 90 percent chance of him tweeting that a real soldier would have caught Bin Laden 10 years sooner. Predict the insulting nickname he’ll give him: (a) Wacky Bill M; (b) Ravin’ McRaven; (c) Barking SEAL; (d) Admiral Cuck.

What’ll be really exciting is when he revokes Obama’s and Hillary’s security clearances the day before the midterms. Big turnout motivator. Here’s an address by McRaven that went viral a few years ago, just to give you a sense of his approach to life. He’ll make a stellar choice for defense secretary by President Avenatti
 
Politics
Is Trump finally ready to turn his sights to remaking the 9th Circuit




WASHINGTON – There's been a noticeable exception to President Donald Trump's otherwise successful effort to appoint young, conservative judges to the nation's appellate courts.

The Senate has confirmed a record 24 new circuit court judges nationwide in 20 months — with two more nominees scheduled for votes this week. But Trump has made far less progress in the jurisdiction he criticizes the most: the liberal-leaning U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, including California and eight other Western states.

Since Trump took office, the Senate has confirmed only one 9th Circuit judge — in Hawaii — leaving seven openings. A nominee in Oregon was abruptly withdrawn last month when it became clear he lacked the votes for Senate approval.


And Trump has yet to even nominate anyone for the three vacancies in California, partly because of a standoff with Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris.

But there are signs that the administration is beginning to set its sights on the 9th Circuit, likely triggering a bruising fight with Democrats.



For one thing, Trump is running out of vacancies in other circuits, particularly in conservative states where confirmation is easier.

"They've been focusing on lower-hanging fruit," said Ilya Shapiro, a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute. "After a while there are only so many seats to fill."

More than half of the 13 vacancies remaining nationwide are on the 9th Circuit.





Why Trump isn't moving faster is a mystery, considering how conservatives have long reviled the 9th Circuit and Trump has frequently attacked its rulings.

Since his inauguration, 9th Circuit judges have ruled that he couldn't legally bar tens of thousands of visitors and immigrants from several mostly Muslim nations from entering the country (a decision the Supreme Court overturned). They've forced him to continue processing renewal applications of immigrants previously approved for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which Trump ended. Last month, a judge knocked down Trump's order restricting federal funds to so-called sanctuary cities.

"I thought they would have moved more aggressively," San Francisco appellate attorney Ben Feuer said.

But the recent fight over Ryan W. Bounds' nomination in Oregon showed that Trump and the Republican-led Senate are ready to adopt a tougher stance, including scrapping a long-standing Senate tradition to push through Trump's choices if necessary.

Oregon's two Democratic senators, Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley, opposed Bounds and refused to issue their "blue slips," a century-old courtesy in which senators are asked to sign off on nominees from their state.

In the past, rejection by both home state senators was enough to effectively kill a nomination. But for the first time, Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley of Iowa brushed off the home senators' views and moved forward anyway.

Previously the Senate has only considered a nomination if both or at least one of the home state senators approved.



Bounds' nomination ultimately failed, but not because the Oregon senators didn't return their blue slips. Instead some of Bounds' old racially charged writings raised doubts among enough senators, including at least one Republican, that the White House withdrew his nomination.

But the precedent of breaking with the blue-slip tradition has deep implications for the 9th Circuit, where four of the nine states it covers have two Democratic senators.

Idaho's Republican senators support Trump nominee Ryan D. Nelson, so he is quickly moving through the process without a problem.

And Hawaii's two Democratic senators enthusiastically backed Trump nominee Judge Mark J. Bennett as a consensus pick who had already been vetted by their review committees. He was approved in July by a 72-27 vote.

But the rest of the vacancies will not be so easy.

Trump nominated appellate attorney Eric D. Miller of Washington state though he was not recommended by the review committee created by the state's Democratic senators, Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell. Murray says she's reserving judgment on Miller, but Cantwell's office immediately signaled another potential fight ahead, telling the Seattle Times that "the senator did not and does not consent to Eric Miller's nomination."

In Arizona, where Trump doesn't get along with either Republican senator, he's held off as well.

[Analysis: Winners and losers from Tuesday's primaries: Once again, Trump is a big winner]

Trump is saving the biggest battle for last. In California, talks between the administration and the state's senators appear to have stalled.

The White House floated some potential names, which the senators' review committees have examined. In early May, Harris and Feinstein recommended three potential judges to the White House. Neither side would say if there was any overlap between the two groups, but the lack of any nomination suggests there was not.

A White House official said the president intended to fill the 9th Circuit vacancies with more conservatives, but would not provide any timeline.
The recent focus on completing the confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court could be delaying action in the 9th Circuit, though it hasn't stopped the Senate from voting on other judicial nominees.

Feinstein said in a statement that they are working to come to consensus.



Trump's best chance to reshape the 9th Circuit will be filling two of the vacant California seats once held by liberal lions: Judge Harry Pregerson, who took a reduced workload in 2015 and died in late 2017, and Judge Stephen Reinhardt, who died unexpectedly in March. Both were President Jimmy Carter appointees and were considered among the most left-leaning judges in the country.

Judge Alex Kozinski, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan, retired in December amid accusations of sexual misconduct, creating a third California vacancy.

Though Trump is within striking distance of flipping some circuits from a majority of Democratic appointees to a majority of Republican appointees, the best he can hope for so far in the 9th would be increasing the conservative presence on the court.

Before Trump took office, the 9th Circuit had 20 Democratic and nine Republican appointees. If Trump filled all the current openings with conservatives, the balance would be 16 Democratic appointees to 13 Republican appointees.

Feinstein, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, is livid about Republicans' willingness to move forward without the blue slips and has warned them publicly against proposing nominees in California she and Harris don't support.

"It's no secret that President Trump and Republicans want to reshape the 9th Circuit and we will not accept unwarranted, partisan attacks on our courts," Feinstein said in March. "I am fully committed to ensuring that 9th Circuit nominees reflect our state's communities and values and are well-regarded by their local bench and bar."
 
in today's "You can't make this shit up News" --

K-A Conway thinks reporters assigned to the White House should just do their jobs and stop obsessing on t.

Eric "Fredo" Trump tweeted that he doesn't like disloyal people.
 
So what does t fear moat today -- the Manafort trial, whatever the Russians have on him (and he knows what that might be - he was there), or whatever is on the Omarosa tapes (and he knows what that might be - he was there)?
 
Back
Top