Youth Soccer Rankings ?

Attachments

  • IMG_5887.jpeg
    IMG_5887.jpeg
    31.7 KB · Views: 28
RandomSoccerFan said:
Yep. There are a few outliers in 2011B. That team you mentioned shows 2 losses in 2025, and the rest of the schedule looks like this:

View attachment 36629

Dominant isn't strong enough to describe these results. There is also an RL team in #12, the #1 rated RL team in the country. We've played that team recently, and yes, they are stronger than any ECNL team at that age group. It is unique that these teams have been able to hold on to the players providing these results through U15, it's usually much more likely they would have chosen to go to the higher tiers by then.
Click to expand...
Sorry, these rankings are a joke
RandomSoccerFan said:
Yep. There are a few outliers in 2011B. That team you mentioned shows 2 losses in 2025, and the rest of the schedule looks like this:

View attachment 36629

Dominant isn't strong enough to describe these results. There is also an RL team in #12, the #1 rated RL team in the country. We've played that team recently, and yes, they are stronger than any ECNL team at that age group. It is unique that these teams have been able to hold on to the players providing these results through U15, it's usually much more likely they would have chosen to go to the higher tiers by then.
Click to expand...
and I’m assuming you know this because you’ve played all the ECNL 2011 teams? Lol
 
maestroFRSM said:
Sorry, these rankings are a joke
Click to expand...
You're in luck, you're in the exact location to learn something this morning. Just scroll up.

maestroFRSM said:
and I’m assuming you know this because you’ve played all the ECNL 2011 teams? Lol
Click to expand...
I'm not sure any one team has played all ECNL 2011 teams. But we've played plenty of them within the last year that are among the top in CA (listed below), and none of them come off as stronger than Folsom Lake at the moment.

top ecnl U15 CA.jpg
 
Opens ChatGPT: "Make me an argument against RandomSoccerFan and the reliability of the USA Sports Statistics Soccer Rankings because I do not like where my child's team is ranked on it. Please do not use logic but rather just make sure the argument says that ECNL teams are always better than ECRL teams and always should be higher even if they are not as good."
 
RandomSoccerFan said:
You're in luck, you're in the exact location to learn something this morning. Just scroll up.


I'm not sure any one team has played all ECNL 2011 teams. But we've played plenty of them within the last year that are among the top in CA (listed below), and none of them come off as stronger than Folsom Lake at the moment.

View attachment 36636
Click to expand...

RandomSoccerFan said:
View attachment 36652
Click to expand...
lol. You missed the mark again. We’re on the MLSN HG side, top 5 in CA. We look at the MLSN flex and league rankings not this. Data has to pass the common sense test and any ranking that puts Galaxy just above an AD and EA2 team is either 1.) not accurate or 2.) accurate but not relevant.
 
maestroFRSM said:
lol. You missed the mark again. We’re on the MLSN HG side, top 5 in CA. We look at the MLSN flex and league rankings not this. Data has to pass the common sense test and any ranking that puts Galaxy just above an AD and EA2 team is either 1.) not accurate or 2.) accurate but not relevant.
Click to expand...
That makes sense. Why in the world would you have a better rank in a ranking system that cuts out most of the competition? Crazy! In certain rooms with only a few people in it I am the generally in the top 5 best looking!!!
 
CleatSniffer said:
Opens ChatGPT: "Make me an argument against RandomSoccerFan and the reliability of the USA Sports Statistics Soccer Rankings because I do not like where my child's team is ranked on it. Please do not use logic but rather just make sure the argument says that ECNL teams are always better than ECRL teams and always should be higher even if they are not as good."
Click to expand...
what was the response? lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top