Yes, you probably do not know them. Some of them are Iraqis who wished Saddam was back. Some of them are Libyans who wished Gaddafi was back.
Its called the Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Most of these lower needs can be achieved through financial freedom. Political freedom does not except at the very top of self actualization.
I remember reading an article decades ago, Filipinos were questioning if they were lagging behind the rest of South East Asia and Asia because they had too much democracy. Many successful Asian tigers were ruled by dictators, to start, Singapore under Lee Kuan Yew, South Korea under Park Chung Hee, Republic of China in Taiwan under Chiang to name a few.
To give an example, Singapore has such a draconian government that it holds the world record for imprisoning the longest ever serving political prisoner without trial, beating Nelson Mandela. Yet every election, the ruling party wins easily, why? Financial freedom. People become rich under this government. At some point when money is no longer an object, they will go for higher level needs.
For most countries with GDP under 15000, I think it is safe to say to say the priority for most people is financial freedom over political freedom. Many citizens who think political freedom matters soon realize that upon changing the government through election, the same corruption happens no matter who is in government. Good economy and governance on the other hand guarantees food on the table, shelter, a happy family, and if a dictator can deliver that, why not.
For this, I believe that many attempts to "spread democracy" like those in Iraq or Libya to name a few, are really sinister attempts at destablizing foreign governments.
View attachment 13070