socalsoccercoach
BRONZE
DM what is even more interesting is the coach in question didn't actually coach her daughters only maybe filled in from time to time just to add great context to more of the fabrications and fraud.
Socalsoccercoach you’re working really hard to discredit me. I never said VT was my daughter’s primary soccer coach. Yes he did fill-in and travel with our team to a tournament and stay in the same hotel that we did and that makes my skin crawl.DM what is even more interesting is the coach in question didn't actually coach her daughters only maybe filled in from time to time just to add great context to more of the fabrications and fraud.
You can tell us if I'm wrong, Smellycleats, but it sounds like you were somehow involved in the Eagles in some capacity beyond just being a parent. And it sounds like you were aware of the rumors concerning the offending coach. So ....
Just sayin'. I have no connection with the Eagles whatsoever, and don't know a single person involved in the organization. But, smellycleats, it sounds like the Eagles fired the coach, notified all parents, and got counseling for any players who desired it. It doesn't sound like they need to "cover their ass" from a legal standpoint, as the events described took place some 10 years ago, and any limitations statute would already have expired.
- Why did you allow your own daughter to stay on the team?
- Why did you allow your own daughter to stay at the same hotel as the coach?
- Why did you not inform other families of the "rumors?"
- What did you do to protect your daughter and others?
Smellycleats, you seem to enjoy bashing the Eagles. But what have you done to make things better?
My intention here has been to make sure that the matter of VT abusing a 14 player did not get swept under the rug. I wanted parents to be reminded that there are dangerous adults out there who have access to our young athletes and to constantly be vigilant because the powers that be at their clubs are not always looking out for them. DM, what did I do to protect kids? I took mine and left. I refused to shut up about this issue despite attacks. There are clearly posters here who have much invested in the Eagles and are willing to overlook transgressions.
Why are several posters focused on attacking other posters about this type of issue rather than keeping the attention on the perpetrators? Clubs have poor club policies and climates that contribute to these opportunities for the predators. Whatever is the issue with SC and Eagles it doesn't change the situation of a now convicted child molester having had free reign at a youth soccer club for 20 years. Club DOC's and presidents can claim - "Oh my, I had no idea" but often times people ignore the signs and discount parent's concerns when something doesn't seem right. There are a few things that club admins can change in club soccer to help reduce risk of this and create a safer environment for the kids.
What new internal procedures do you recommend?One of the problems is the club's attitude that comes through. In the initial newspaper article the president said "there aren't any new internal procedures on the club's part that are expected to be implemented in light of the allegations...".this is definitely a time when new procedures and policies need to be put in place. She also made a point to state what a close friend he is. Right now it sounds like they are trying to cover themselves from liability in this.
I’ve been a part of this form for several years. I’ve never told this story. I only did so today because I was personally attacked. Regardless of how you characterize this, I stand by what I said. While you focus on the rationale for protecting adults in this situation I’m focused on kids.The poster in question, smellycleats, deserves to be called out. He or she has used this forum as a way of relitigating an old grievancEagles - a grievance unrelated to any sexual misconduct by any person associated with the Eagles. Her commentary takes away the focus on the things that really are important: that the offender be prosecuted and afforded due process, that the victim receive justice from the Courts, and that all clubs and parents take steps to protect their children.
If smellycleats had focused on those points, instead of using a tragedy to validate her own unrelated problem with the club, everyone would be better off.
Horseshit!I’ve been a part of this form for several years. I’ve never told this story. I only did so today because I was personally attacked. Regardless of how you characterize this, I stand by what I said. While you focus on the rationale for protecting adults in this situation I’m focused on kids.
I don't believe you are focused on kids. I don't believe you are trying to make any child safe. I don't believe you are trying to help make things better.I’ve been a part of this form for several years. I’ve never told this story. I only did so today because I was personally attacked. Regardless of how you characterize this, I stand by what I said. While you focus on the rationale for protecting adults in this situation I’m focused on kids.
OK Daniel Miller. We can agree to disagreeI don't believe you are focused on kids. I don't believe you are trying to make any child safe. I don't believe you are trying to help make things better.
Smellycleats, you are not helping the victim in this case; you are using her tragedy as a tool to settle an old score with the Eagles. Her loss is your convenience.
So you are charging them with fraud (hope there wasn't a signed contract involved) and they have the ability to charge you with theft (cashed a check that didn't belong to you??)...sounds like a good one for Judge Judy.Socalsoccercoach you’re working really hard to discredit me. I never said VT was my daughter’s primary soccer coach. Yes he did fill-in and travel with our team to a tournament and stay in the same hotel that we did and that makes my skin crawl.
For those of you who are interested, my issue with this club began when my coach and club administrators failed to protect my seven-year-old daughter from a parent on her U8 team.
This parent verbally attacked my 7 y/o daughter while I was taking other players to the restroom during warm-ups before a game. My daughter took a bad touch on the ball and hit this parent. His reaction was full of rage and out of control. He scared the hell out of my child who faced this angry guy alone. It was witnessed by many people, including my coach, who did nothing. This parent was under the delusional impression that my 7 y/o was targeting him with the ball. He sent an email to our family that evening stating this and demanding an apology from her. We appealed to the club to do something to protect my daughter going forward. All parents sign agreements regarding parent behavior on the sidelines- can’t speak to the ref, yell negative comments, etc. How could our club possibly allow this parent to verbally attack a child on his own daughter’s team?
We sent all emails to Eagles and requested repeatedly that they do something to protect my daughter. This parent would routinely attend practices and stand with my coach during practice. He was also allowed to coach our team during several scrimmages and at a game. How could we continue to play on a team where my daughter felt intimidated and afraid. While we were still in talks with the Eagles about the best way to handle the situation, our coach announced to my daughters team that she had left the club.
Months later I heard about VT. In our experience, Eagles do what’s best for the ADULTS at Eagles-players are secondary. My seven-year-old daughter was certainly secondary. My intention here has been to make sure that the matter of VT abusing a 14 player did not get swept under the rug. I wanted parents to be reminded that there are dangerous adults out there who have access to our young athletes and to constantly be vigilant because the powers that be at their clubs are not always looking out for them. DM, what did I do to protect kids? I took mine and left. I refused to shut up about this issue despite attacks. There are clearly posters here who have much invested in the Eagles and are willing to overlook transgressions. It is exactly that attitude that allows dangerous people to operate without consequences within an organization. As for money owed, Eagles is in breach of contract and the courts will have the last word on that.
What new internal procedures do you recommend?
They should have a zero tolerance policy on texting/emails. Violate the rule once and you are gone. Don't report someone violating the rule and you are also gone. That way there is no gray area on what is an innocent mistake.1. Coaches are not allowed to individually text a player. OK
2. Communication between players and coaches are conducted at practice, games or official team activities only. Any other communication is communicated by the team captain to the players. NEEDS WORK. A TEAM CAPTAIN IS A "PLAYER," SO SHE SHOULD NOT HAVE PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS EITHER. COMMUNICATION SHOULD ALWAYS BE ALLOWED IF A PARENT IS PRESENT.
3. Coaches stay at a different hotel than the team and no parent or player is to visit the coach at his or her hotel for any reason. OK IN CONCEPT. BUT I DON'T KNOW WHY A "PARENT" IS PROHIBITED FROM VISITING A COACH.
4. Coaches do not travel in a car with any players unless parent or team manager is also there. OK. ALSO OK IF PARENT IS THERE.
5. No private dinners between some players and coaches - only team events. OK. BUT SHOULD E OK IF A PARENT IS PRESENT.
6. Coaches are not to ask personal questions of players - these coaches are not the players' therapist and should stick to coaching not trying to conduct family therapy or personal counseling. HMM. THAT MIGHT BE A BIT MUCH, DEPENDING ON WHAT YOU MEAN BY "PERSONAL."
7. Coaches are to refrain from any use of alcohol or drugs at any team event and risk immediate termination if this rule is broken. IN GENERAL, YES, BUT DO YOU MEAN HAVING A BEER AT A TEAM PARTY WHERE OTHER PARENTS ARE DRINKING BEER?
8. Clubs establish an advocacy committee made up of parent and club representatives where grievances can be taken for legitimate evaluation and mediation (this can be a complaint about coach or parent) . If it is unresolved then there is a larger advocacy group outside of the club from a consortium of other clubs so it is taken out of the private backroom of the club where coaches and club DOC's collude and blackball or bash parents. MIGHT BE A GOOD POLICY IN GENERAL, BUT IS NOT DESIGNED TO PROTECT AGAINST SEXUAL PREDATORS.
9. A 360 evaluation of coaches required and considered with respect for the parent's feedback and raises are based in part on customer satisfaction. MIGHT BE A GOOD POLICY IN GENERAL, BUT IS NOT DESIGNED TO PROTECT AGAINST SEXUAL PREDATORS.
10. The club climate is changed so the coaches and club admin remember that the parents are the customer and partner in the situation with minor children. MIGHT BE A GOOD POLICY IN GENERAL, BUT IS NOT DESIGNED TO PROTECT AGAINST SEXUAL PREDATORS.
11. Mandated training on child development, adolescent psychology, ethics and boundaries, sexual harassment and misconduct, relevant criminal laws and legal consequences if commit any of those crimes. A COURSE ON CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY? I THOUGHT COACHES WEREN'T SUPPOSED TO BE "THERAPISTS." (SEE #6 ABOVE) IT MIGHT BE GOOD TO KNOW ALL THAT STUFF IN A GENERAL SENSE, BUT WHO IS GOING TO PAY FOR THE COURSES, HOW MANY COACHES WILL YOU LOSE BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO TAKE THE COURSES, AND HOW WILL YOU REPLACE THEM? YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE TO HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE TO COACH CLUB SOCCER, AND YOU SHOULDN'T MAKE THE BAR SO HIGH THAT PEOPLE WON'T WANT TO COACH.
1. Coaches are not allowed to individually text a player
2. Communication between players and coaches are conducted at practice, games or official team activities only. Any other communication is communicated by the team captain to the players.
3. Coaches stay at a different hotel than the team and no parent or player is to visit the coach at his or her hotel for any reason.
4. Coaches do not travel in a car with any players unless parent or team manager is also there.
5. No private dinners between some players and coaches - only team events
6. Coaches are not to ask personal questions of players - these coaches are not the players' therapist and should stick to coaching not trying to conduct family therapy or personal counseling.
7. Coaches are to refrain from any use of alcohol or drugs at any team event and risk immediate termination if this rule is broken.
8. Clubs establish an advocacy committee made up of parent and club representatives where grievances can be taken for legitimate evaluation and mediation (this can be a complaint about coach or parent) . If it is unresolved then there is a larger advocacy group outside of the club from a consortium of other clubs so it is taken out of the private backroom of the club where coaches and club DOC's collude and blackball or bash parents.
9. A 360 evaluation of coaches required and considered with respect for the parent's feedback and raises are based in part on customer satisfaction.
10. The club climate is changed so the coaches and club admin remember that the parents are the customer and partner in the situation with minor children.
11. Mandated training on child development, adolescent psychology, ethics and boundaries, sexual harassment and misconduct, relevant criminal laws and legal consequences if commit any of those crimes
That's a few ideas to start......
Brief online class which covers the basics - would not be expensive or much time requirement. Is there such a shortage of coaches that want these coaching positions?1. Coaches are not allowed to individually text a player. OK
2. Communication between players and coaches are conducted at practice, games or official team activities only. Any other communication is communicated by the team captain to the players. NEEDS WORK. A TEAM CAPTAIN IS A "PLAYER," SO SHE SHOULD NOT HAVE PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS EITHER. COMMUNICATION SHOULD ALWAYS BE ALLOWED IF A PARENT IS PRESENT. Agree
3. Coaches stay at a different hotel than the team and no parent or player is to visit the coach at his or her hotel for any reason. OK IN CONCEPT. BUT I DON'T KNOW WHY A "PARENT" IS PROHIBITED FROM VISITING A COACH. why would a parent need to visit the coach at his or her hotel?
4. Coaches do not travel in a car with any players unless parent or team manager is also there. OK. ALSO OK IF PARENT IS THERE.
5. No private dinners between some players and coaches - only team events. OK. BUT SHOULD E OK IF A PARENT IS PRESENT.
6. Coaches are not to ask personal questions of players - these coaches are not the players' therapist and should stick to coaching not trying to conduct family therapy or personal counseling. HMM. THAT MIGHT BE A BIT MUCH, DEPENDING ON WHAT YOU MEAN BY "PERSONAL." "personal": questions about their relationships with their boyfriends, questions about sex, questions about family issues that are better explored by a professional therapist,
7. Coaches are to refrain from any use of alcohol or drugs at any team event and risk immediate termination if this rule is broken. IN GENERAL, YES, BUT DO YOU MEAN HAVING A BEER AT A TEAM PARTY WHERE OTHER PARENTS ARE DRINKING BEER? So how much alcohol would be ok? Would it be ok for the coach to get drunk at the team party if other parents are also wasted? I don't know how you have a guideline about it, either you can drink alcohol or not so not sure how that would work. Maybe other parents aren't concerned about this.
8. Clubs establish an advocacy committee made up of parent and club representatives where grievances can be taken for legitimate evaluation and mediation (this can be a complaint about coach or parent) . If it is unresolved then there is a larger advocacy group outside of the club from a consortium of other clubs so it is taken out of the private backroom of the club where coaches and club DOC's collude and blackball or bash parents. MIGHT BE A GOOD POLICY IN GENERAL, BUT IS NOT DESIGNED TO PROTECT AGAINST SEXUAL PREDATORS. It sets the tone that parents have an avenue to bring up concerns and limits potential predators actions/freedom.
9. A 360 evaluation of coaches required and considered with respect for the parent's feedback and raises are based in part on customer satisfaction. MIGHT BE A GOOD POLICY IN GENERAL, BUT IS NOT DESIGNED TO PROTECT AGAINST SEXUAL PREDATORS. It creates a structure that coaches are accountable to parents and the club so it reduces the isolation which can contribute to predators behaviors.
10. The club climate is changed so the coaches and club admin remember that the parents are the customer and partner in the situation with minor children. MIGHT BE A GOOD POLICY IN GENERAL, BUT IS NOT DESIGNED TO PROTECT AGAINST SEXUAL PREDATORS. It ends the behavior of excluding parents which opens up the door for predators to prey on vulnerable players
11. Mandated training on child development, adolescent psychology, ethics and boundaries, sexual harassment and misconduct, relevant criminal laws and legal consequences if commit any of those crimes. A COURSE ON CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY? I THOUGHT COACHES WEREN'T SUPPOSED TO BE "THERAPISTS." (SEE #6 ABOVE) IT MIGHT BE GOOD TO KNOW ALL THAT STUFF IN A GENERAL SENSE, BUT WHO IS GOING TO PAY FOR THE COURSES, HOW MANY COACHES WILL YOU LOSE BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO TAKE THE COURSES, AND HOW WILL YOU REPLACE THEM? YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE TO HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE TO COACH CLUB SOCCER, AND YOU SHOULDN'T MAKE THE BAR SO HIGH THAT PEOPLE WON'T WANT TO COACH.