Vaccine

HAPPENING NOW: If you are Canadian and you support the truckers and the government finds out about it they can shut down your bank accounts without a court order EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY.

Dang, you should put on your viking hat and face paint, and then storm the Capitol building asap.
 
I could compare CA to low density states in the north of the US. Sound fair?

Perhaps MT, ND, SD, MN, AK, WI, and MI.

I won't be mean and saddle you with solid blue states like WA and ME. They'd ruin your average.

That is along the lines of why the original comparison in the tweet Grace linked is likely flawed and simply done for effect. US population density look up is 90 something mi(2) whereas CA is 250 mi(2). Testing rate per 100K, how does that compare? Age distribution (lots of the better rate comparisons are age adjusted anymore). Etc. You could pick states that are probably closer to being an orange to an orange on basic population criteria. But it is still comparing data sets that likely differ in unpredictable ways. so the best thing short of random sampling is try and get a dataset for one group likely to share a lot in common and compare on a variable. That's pretty easy to do with something like vaxx status in a city and how do cases bin, for instance, at least in principle. But I'm guessing it's gets trickier with NPI since if I remember that was the initial thing.
 
You just don't give up. The US was/is always destined to have higher mortality rates than peer countries. Doesn't really matter what you do, unless you cut out pepsi, french fries, donuts, joo joo beans, etc.

I admire (kinda) your desire to 100% protect everyone walking the streets in this country. Unfortunately that wasn't never going to be an achievable end state. What we should have done (as most smart health experts have been advocating since this all began) was to focus on the most vulnerable. People

A nuanced approach to public health was thrown out the window years ago, with plenty of blame to go around.
Your theory is that Canada doesn’t have unhealthy food?

I’ll bet you a Molson and a bowl of poutine that they have some.
 
I could compare CA to low density states in the north of the US. Sound fair?

Perhaps MT, ND, SD, MN, AK, WI, and MI.

I won't be mean and saddle you with solid blue states like WA and ME. They'd ruin your average.
Cherry picking again.

And you claim to be a math guy.

So many variables not accounted for.

Health of population, demographics, density, type of climate, etc.

It is why there are so many variations between the states and WITHIN the states.

It is why with in the EU which has a smaller area you see differences between countries who had similar POINTLESS mask rules and lockdowns.

Masks don't work. If they did you would see lots of studies showing this to be the fact. CDC studied it and came to the conclusion pre covid they are ineffective. WHO in 2019 said the same thing. Only thing that changed was the politics. You are still stuck talking about the Bangladesh study which isn't really conclusive one way or the other. By now with hundreds of millions of people using or who have used masks in countless countries...if they really made a difference there would be a ton of well regarded studies showing it. The fact that there are not any tells you all you need to know.

Lockdowns don't work because people have to go out and work, etc. Human nature comes into play as well.

It is an amazing thing to watch you cling to zero covid. Pretending that if we had just done this we would have saved X amount of people.

And then your latest with N95s (yes I know you have been wearing them for some time). You claim and others that THIS is the solution.

IT isn't either. They are not designed to be worn for any long period of time. They need to be fitted properly. Nobody is doing that. Those reasons alone tell you that they wont be the solution. That is called what happens in the real world. You are looking at the label and thinking they should stop 95% of everything therefore in the world at large it will reduce transmission by 95%. It won't because of human nature, their actual design, the need to be properly fitted, etc.
 
Cherry picking again.

And you claim to be a math guy.

So many variables not accounted for.

Health of population, demographics, density, type of climate, etc.

It is why there are so many variations between the states and WITHIN the states.

It is why with in the EU which has a smaller area you see differences between countries who had similar POINTLESS mask rules and lockdowns.

Masks don't work. If they did you would see lots of studies showing this to be the fact. CDC studied it and came to the conclusion pre covid they are ineffective. WHO in 2019 said the same thing. Only thing that changed was the politics. You are still stuck talking about the Bangladesh study which isn't really conclusive one way or the other. By now with hundreds of millions of people using or who have used masks in countless countries...if they really made a difference there would be a ton of well regarded studies showing it. The fact that there are not any tells you all you need to know.

Lockdowns don't work because people have to go out and work, etc. Human nature comes into play as well.

It is an amazing thing to watch you cling to zero covid. Pretending that if we had just done this we would have saved X amount of people.

And then your latest with N95s (yes I know you have been wearing them for some time). You claim and others that THIS is the solution.

IT isn't either. They are not designed to be worn for any long period of time. They need to be fitted properly. Nobody is doing that. Those reasons alone tell you that they wont be the solution. That is called what happens in the real world. You are looking at the label and thinking they should stop 95% of everything therefore in the world at large it will reduce transmission by 95%. It won't because of human nature, their actual design, the need to be properly fitted, etc.
Nice word spam.

If you want the heavy statistical analysis, it exists.

But it tells you the things you don't want to hear: masks work, bars spread covid, and vaccines also reduce transmission.

Those things you mock? They save lives.
 
A good piece by Vinay Prasad on the junk studies the CDC has been putting out that have been geared to justify their policies, and how it resembles propaganda (hmmm....someone around here has used that word before to describe these) rather than actual science. It leads the realclearpolitics articles for today.

 
Nice word spam.

If you want the heavy statistical analysis, it exists.

But it tells you the things you don't want to hear: masks work, bars spread covid, and vaccines also reduce transmission.

Those things you mock? They save lives.
I thought the vaccine is supposed to save lives? hmmn...antivax misinformation I guess.
 
Nice word spam.

If you want the heavy statistical analysis, it exists.

But it tells you the things you don't want to hear: masks work, bars spread covid, and vaccines also reduce transmission.

Those things you mock? They save lives.
“Almost invariably they get minimal symptoms or no symptoms at all,” but new research shows they average about the same level of virus in their nasal pharynx as they unvaccinated, so that’s why vaccinated people need to wear masks indoors, Fauci said on CBS‘s “Face The Nation.”
 
You may or may not agree that the methods the truckers are employing are merited, but the Canadian governments response has essentially smashed through another set of norms in the western democratic world, this time due process. If a government can declare any protest it deems excessive or offensive illegal, and then move to seize bank accounts supporting those protests without judicial review, a dark line has been crossed.

 
“Almost invariably they get minimal symptoms or no symptoms at all,” but new research shows they average about the same level of virus in their nasal pharynx as they unvaccinated, so that’s why vaccinated people need to wear masks indoors, Fauci said on CBS‘s “Face The Nation.”
Yes. Same peak, fewer symptoms, shorter duration.

Fauci has a record of telling that part of the truth which prompts the behavior he thinks will help. Remember the line on masks from March, 2020.

So, when he wants vaccinated people to wear masks, he reminds us that we can still spread covid. He omits the facts that vaccinated people are less likely to get infected, and spread covid for a shorter time.

He’s not quite lying, but he’s not telling the full truth either.
 
Nice word spam.

If you want the heavy statistical analysis, it exists.

But it tells you the things you don't want to hear: masks work, bars spread covid, and vaccines also reduce transmission.

Those things you mock? They save lives.
They don't save lives.

Other than not going out and avoiding human contact, none of the "plans" or masks made a difference.

You like to pull numbers out of thin air or as pointed out above cherry pick data so you can avoid reality.
 
I thought the vaccine is supposed to save lives? hmmn...antivax misinformation I guess.
You’ve made progress. You used to be all about single cause fallacies. Now you’re making a single effect fallacy. Hope it’s fun to try something new.

More to the point, the fact that the vaccine reduces your odds of death does not mean it cannot also reduce your odds of transmission. It does both.

(hence the oversimplified “dead end for the virus” claim)
 
You’ve made progress. You used to be all about single cause fallacies. Now you’re making a single effect fallacy. Hope it’s fun to try something new.

More to the point, the fact that the vaccine reduces your odds of death does not mean it cannot also reduce your odds of transmission. It does both.

(hence the oversimplified “dead end for the virus” claim)

Still having a hard time wrapping my head around on why cases matter so much to you if a) everyone is eventually going to get it (so you are just fiddling around with time), and b) the vaccines do a good job at preventing death and severe outcome.

You are still clutching at COVID zero, whether you admit it or not, it seems til the very end.
 
Back
Top