The laziest are typically amused when someone else doesn’t do their work for them…I am frequently amused by posters who claim "easy to find" without leaving one of the "easy to find" links.
And even if I did find it on my own, it does not answer the more fundamental question of where Grace found it.
funny since the context was regarding the Alex Berenson v Twitter lawsuit.I did check.
I saw no mention of a ban on covid vaccines.
I did see articles about a change to recommendations with respect to Moderna. Basically, use Pfizer for young people.
But no talk of Denmark banning youth covid vaccines in general.
If you found such a link from a reputable source, post it. If it happened, it would have been all over the mainstream European press.
The laziest are typically amused when someone else doesn’t do their work for them…
Ignoring the origin story, it sounds like the virus at this stage transfers more easily from human to animal. It that incorrect, unknown, or just a result of the fact that the virus is so pervasive in humans?Gottcha. Harumphing. Like the sewage sea foam wraiths. But there's an important point in all of it about where we need to be monitoring. Not so much for natural Cvirus genetic diversity anymore. But for point sources of re-emergence.
Gottcha. Harumphing. Like the sewage sea foam wraiths. But there's an important point in all of it about where we need to be monitoring. Not so much for natural Cvirus genetic diversity anymore. But for point sources of re-emergence.
Ignoring the origin story, it sounds like the virus at this stage transfers more easily from human to animal. It that incorrect, unknown, or just a result of the fact that the virus is so pervasive in humans?
I’m not your dosi doh partner…..find someone else who wants to play your my damn games cause it doesn’t matter where she found it, does it….NO.You seem to be operating under the assumption that I didn't find relevant information.
And -- as I already stated -- that doesn't answer the question.
I’m not your dosi doh partner…..find someone else who wants to play your my damn games cause it doesn’t matter where she found it, does it….NO.
It’s out there and public record
How was he dangerous?And what does the "public record" show? For a time, Berenson was Tucker Carlson's favorite science fiction writer, even giving him regular segments on his show. However, when it became obvious that Berenson's "don't worry about covid" fables were obviously dangerously wrong, he was dropped. So he continued his self-promoting campaign on twitter.
None of that answers the question of where Grace got her hand-wringing version.
Was the misspelling intentional? Some kinda hybrid shrew?Funny how quickly they found those schrews.
He was casting doubt about the seriousness of the pandemic and the efficacy of the vaccines. Eventually, not even Fox News could stand him, so he took his personal-publicity campaign to Twitter, where he recruited paid memberships for his exclusive website.How was he dangerous?
Lol! What was he mandating?He was casting doubt about the seriousness of the pandemic and the efficacy of the vaccines.
Best of luck to your son on his college choices.BTW I did google up the "close the beaches thing". It's a LOL for me in that the UCSD/Scripps person in question here is Kim Prather. Turns out this is somebody my son was recommended to try and work with if he ended up choosing UCSD. For what's its worth, here's her "side" of the whole debacle, at least as told through an outlet called "Beachgrit".
Fake news: Scripps scientist Kim ‘wants to yell out her window at every surfer’ Prather says LA Times “retaught me the meaning of out of context”
If I had a dollar for every time a subject said I misquoted ‘em, oowee, I’d be dining, nightly, on civet, otter and wolf puppies, sourced from the finest Chinese wet market. But, knowing media, as I do, having seen the machinations and dirty dealings of major newspapers, I know how often...beachgrit.com
Did you read what she said in the article?Best of luck to your son on his college choices.
,
As far as your article goes, yeah "journalists" have a tendency to embellish, but in this case these were direct quotes from her. Word to paper doesn't always translate as you think and it sounds like she realized how irrational she sounded when she read the articles. Nevertheless, she was dead wrong, and in fact her opinion was dangerous.
We all make mistakes and its how a mistake is handled is the true test of character. She never issued an apology or a retraction of her opinion. Saying she was taken out of context is neither. My biggest issue with the scientific community is the lack of accountability. When a credential scientist makes a public opinion there is an implied credibility and in some cases, like Dad4, a reverence for that opinion. As best as I can tell, there are no repercussions for giving a false opinion, other than scorn from other scientists if you disagree with the consensus opinion. Most credentialed professions have a Code of Ethics with discipline for violating those ethics. To restore credibility in the scientific community it would be prudent to develop some sort of accountability system, particularly for any opinions or studies that are issued publicly.
Which is odd since masks are still required at UCLA.Mask mandate didn’t work against COVID-19 in LA, say doctors from USC and UCLA
A letter from USC and UCLA doctors and researchers sent to L.A. Board of Supervisors said mask mandates won’t slow the spread. Other doctors disagree as the mask debate rages on.www.ocregister.com