Vaccine

Sure. And matchbox cars are even greener than classic cars. Probably not more than a few pounds of CO2 over the entire life of the car.

Maybe we can restrict our discussion to cars that are actually used as cars?

Unless I missed the sarcasm in your reply… my intent was to laugh at the data set they used to arrive at their headline.
 
Per usual you miss the point.

Electric batteries in cars last between 10-20 yrs.

Terribly expensive to replace for staters...and a lot of emission related to producing that 2nd battery.

I have a 2004 vehicle that will run many more yrs without major issues.

As it stands now you will not see a lot of older electric vehicles on the road.

Other issues?

On a large scale they still are not practical. You cannot quickly charge the vehicle. Right now it is an inconvenience. On a mass scale a major issue.

We also do not have the grid anywhere close to handling millions of electric cars on the road.

And then you have the idiocy of trying to shut current reliable power plants with renewables that provide inconsistent power. The euros are coming face to face with reality now as Russia restrict gas. Now they are talking and realize the should not shutter gas and coal plants.. and maybe shuttind down nuclear power as Germany wanted to is a bad idea.

Car and driver just tested out the new electric Ford truck to see how far it could tow things. The results? Not even a hundred miles.

Remember that when politicians talk about electric big rig vehicles
You seem to be thinking of a car as something which you drive 400 miles per day, towing a boat. If that is your average day, don’t get an electric.

For me, an average day is driving 50 miles to work, school, and soccer. For that, an electric works fine. I charge it at night. It takes about 2 seconds to plug it in. I can’t remember the last time I bothered with a public charging station, and it requires almost no maintenance. Most convenient car I’ve ever owned.

I won’t argue against grid upgrades. It is part of the cost of any switch to wind/solar. You can get by with a smaller grid upgrade if you include more nuclear in the mix, but you still have to do it.
 
So GraceT was right about this cult-like obedience to scientific dogma.
What dogma? Making a battery is an industrial process. It consumes energy and causes CO2 emissions. You don’t need a Ted talk to explain the concept. If it came out of a factory, there was some CO2 released somewhere along the way.

Now, if you want to go further than that and say how much CO2, then you need data, links, and the rest of it. For that, a Ted talk is not a very good medium. Video is slow, unidirectional, includes no links to sources, and allows the speaker to completely ignore any point he finds uncomfortable. Useless for a real discussion.
 
Per usual you miss the point.

Electric batteries in cars last between 10-20 yrs.

Terribly expensive to replace for staters...and a lot of emission related to producing that 2nd battery.

I have a 2004 vehicle that will run many more yrs without major issues.

As it stands now you will not see a lot of older electric vehicles on the road.

Other issues?

On a large scale they still are not practical. You cannot quickly charge the vehicle. Right now it is an inconvenience. On a mass scale a major issue.

We also do not have the grid anywhere close to handling millions of electric cars on the road.

And then you have the idiocy of trying to shut current reliable power plants with renewables that provide inconsistent power. The euros are coming face to face with reality now as Russia restrict gas. Now they are talking and realize the should not shutter gas and coal plants.. and maybe shuttind down nuclear power as Germany wanted to is a bad idea.

Car and driver just tested out the new electric Ford truck to see how far it could tow things. The results? Not even a hundred miles.

Remember that when politicians talk about electric big rig vehicles
I some ways the most green vehicle that exists is the one you already own, whether that's electric or fuel. The sunk carbon cost has already been incurred. It's really new vehicles that have the greatest carbon cost. Of course, the benefits of the old car are finite because it won't last forever.
 
What dogma? Making a battery is an industrial process. It consumes energy and causes CO2 emissions. You don’t need a Ted talk to explain the concept. If it came out of a factory, there was some CO2 released somewhere along the way.

Now, if you want to go further than that and say how much CO2, then you need data, links, and the rest of it. For that, a Ted talk is not a very good medium. Video is slow, unidirectional, includes no links to sources, and allows the speaker to completely ignore any point he finds uncomfortable. Useless for a real discussion.
Those that are indoctrinated don't see the dogma.
 
The Rubicon has just been crossed politically. Trump's Mar Largo residence was raided by the FBI. If the GOP ever take the presidency again (particularly if it's DeSantis) they'll wholesale purge the FBI. Like Latin American Republics, each ingoing admin will use the legal infrastructure to punish (even deservedly so) the outgoing admin. As in Latin America, political contests become existential threats to the politicians because they determine who is going to jail.

Assuming Biden lives long enough, if the Rs win 2024 they are totally turning the Hunter situation against him. If true, they will turn the covering of Joe Biden's mental state and possible dementia against those around him.

The Latin Americanization of US politics is here.
1660248422122.png
 
I some ways the most green vehicle that exists is the one you already own, whether that's electric or fuel. The sunk carbon cost has already been incurred. It's really new vehicles that have the greatest carbon cost. Of course, the benefits of the old car are finite because it won't last forever.

Ongoing cost is larger than you’d think. A 20 mpg car will emit 1 pound of CO2 every mile. (1 gallon gas = 20 pounds CO2). So an extra 50,000 miles means an extra 25 tons of CO2.

That’s more than the lifetime emissions of a new electric car.
 
In the click media (eg https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/08/11/cdc-coronavirus-recommendations/) you'll see some of the changes I suggested were coming to CDC guidance. For those interested, below is a link to a rationale statement for those changes that is pretty interesting. Notice, for example, how "community" and "individual" parse out in the document. Basically, like I was saying CDC is at this point going "we'll monitor community, you guys do what you want". It's remarkable to me how epidemiologists and immunologists have come to very different views of where we are with this virus right now.

 
In the click media (eg https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/08/11/cdc-coronavirus-recommendations/) you'll see some of the changes I suggested were coming to CDC guidance. For those interested, below is a link to a rationale statement for those changes that is pretty interesting. Notice, for example, how "community" and "individual" parse out in the document. Basically, like I was saying CDC is at this point going "we'll monitor community, you guys do what you want". It's remarkable to me how epidemiologists and immunologists have come to very different views of where we are with this virus right now.

That all sounds like positive and reasonable steps to me. It does seem like the CDC is catching up with what the public has been doing for months.
 
Good News Sharing: The CDC will no longer recommend schools and other institutions screen healthy students for the coronavirus, and the quarantine rule for unvaccinated individuals has been removed.
 
The term bureaucracy does not elicit quick moving nor agile.

Sure, that's part of it. In my recent travel across the country the only place that insisted on mask and vaccine status was in Navaho country. And for good reason. But for real fry bread and stew totally worth it. Part of it is also the new inputs from the poly sci and information warfare people they are looping into the modeling. From the epidemiological standpoint my read is they take the fairly high but steady case load to mean "this is what endemic with an R11 respiratory virus looks like". So, assuming another VOC doesn't pop out (which it could, who knows) it makes some sense to let it ride at this point. I would image there is also kind of a hope that, for the more guidance compliant urban/higher density areas, the omicron bivalent vaccines have a big effect on steady state case load.
 
NPR say's were getting close to the days of the Flu and those who said no to all the jabs are equal to those who took 4+ jabs.

1660263659448.png
 
Sure, that's part of it. In my recent travel across the country the only place that insisted on mask and vaccine status was in Navaho country. And for good reason. But for real fry bread and stew totally worth it. Part of it is also the new inputs from the poly sci and information warfare people they are looping into the modeling. From the epidemiological standpoint my read is they take the fairly high but steady case load to mean "this is what endemic with an R11 respiratory virus looks like". So, assuming another VOC doesn't pop out (which it could, who knows) it makes some sense to let it ride at this point. I would image there is also kind of a hope that, for the more guidance compliant urban/higher density areas, the omicron bivalent vaccines have a big effect on steady state case load.
Navajo, just saying.
 
The term bureaucracy does not elicit quick moving nor agile.
Sometimes glacial, but the CDC was quick to promote restrictions with very limited data (I get erring on the side of caution up to a point) and slow to recommend a lifting of restrictions despite overwhelming evidence. Bureaucracy can move much quicker when there is a political will to do so.
 
Back
Top