Well I for one will now, going forward, refer to all college sports as the "varsity team" purely to irk @soccersc
Apparently March Madness is going to have all varsity teams this year. Should be really competitive.
It’s always been that way. Even the plumbers attempt at a non-political music video thread devolved into nono nonsense.The thread titled "Vaccine" is now the repository for anyone's daily rants. I think it's time to retire the thread, or at least admit it no longer has much relevant content. Maybe a new OT/COVID forum thread titled "Mandates" could soak up some of the crap.
It’s always been that way. Even the plumbers attempt at a non-political music video thread devolved into nono nonsense.
I have to find that thread and put some Neil Young videos in there.
More off topic. Read Doug Glanville’s ESPN post about why Barry Bonds should never be in the Hall of Fame.
This is just the beginning. People are just starting to examine the data as it becomes available - especially as it relates to children. Also, as things return toward a more normal life, people who have been irrationally fearful will reflect with a clearer perspective. Credibility's loss is division's gain.This article is worth a read.
Talks about the 180 degree turnabout many had regarding a variety of issues regarding covid.
"By January 2022, however, the failure of the previous two years of U.S. COVID policies has become undeniable. Vaccinated people were once promised that they would be “dead ends” for the virus, but 80% of the first omicron cases in the United States were double vaccinated and one-third had received a booster. Many cities that implemented mask mandates and vaccine passports are seeing some of their highest case counts of the pandemic. As a result, the original justifications for COVID restrictions are now being openly contradicted by the same people who once argued for them—but without acknowledging the pivot. With the 2022 midterms in sight, the narrative is simply shifting without apology, and many of the arguments once made by “covidiots” are now being backed by Anthony Fauci, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, and the familiar cast of journalists and experts."
COVID Affects Your Memory
Masks have never worked. Testing has always been problematic. Kids were never high-risk. The past has never been altered. Welcome to the COVID consensus, circa midterms 2022.www.tabletmag.com
It's going to get ugly bro before it's better. Pray if you can or think positives for the Universe to "make love out of nothing at all." We need a love miracle asap. Love you broThis is just the beginning. People are just starting to examine the data as it becomes available - especially as it relates to children. Also, as things return toward a more normal life, people who have been irrationally fearful will reflect with a clearer perspective. Credibility's loss is division's gain.
The media also played a pivotal role in exaggerating COVID dangers for children, obfuscating age-related risk stratification, and portraying kids as superspreaders. Now that school closures are proving to be increasingly unpopular among voters in blue areas, outlets like The New York Times have started reporting on the harms caused by them. But it was many of the same media outlets that spent two years advocating for the necessity of closures, giving ammunition to teachers and administrators intent on keeping kids at home. The Los Angeles Times ran a story in January 2021 about children “apologizing” to their elderly relatives for spreading COVID, and The New York Times published an article claiming COVID would “soar” if schools were allowed to reopen.
Other reports from the paper of record claimed that babies were “especially vulnerable” (March 2020), that it was risky for children to play together (June 2020), that children under 5 may host up to “100 times as much of the virus in the upper respiratory tract as adults” (July 2020), that virtual learning provided Black families a relief from racism (October 2020), and quoted teachers who said that teaching in-person was like being offered as “tribute” in The Hunger Games (November 2020). Over and over again, the Times published terrifying stories about “disturbing,” “mysterious” symptoms of an extremely rare inflammatory condition in children, stoking anxiety about new and unknown threats to kids without providing context.
Air Supply? "make love out of nothing at all."It's going to get ugly bro before it's better. Pray if you can or think positives for the Universe to "make love out of nothing at all." We need a love miracle asap. Love you bro
Kinda like the Espolas neighborhood should be retarded...oops.This is available --
1,422,844 views
Bluetooth headphones on...
Especially disturbing in light of what's happening with Pfizer and the under Looks like the powers that be will rush through the under 5 EU application even thought the results from a 2 dose vaccine were less than spectacular in terms of antibody response, there's no extensive study on efficacy, and a 3 dose is still under investigation. What's more disturbing is that if the FDA gives the go ahead, several jurisdictions might very well try to mandate it then for day care even though the studying on this has been rushed and inconclusive.This is just the beginning. People are just starting to examine the data as it becomes available - especially as it relates to children. Also, as things return toward a more normal life, people who have been irrationally fearful will reflect with a clearer perspective. Credibility's loss is division's gain.
The media also played a pivotal role in exaggerating COVID dangers for children, obfuscating age-related risk stratification, and portraying kids as superspreaders. Now that school closures are proving to be increasingly unpopular among voters in blue areas, outlets like The New York Times have started reporting on the harms caused by them. But it was many of the same media outlets that spent two years advocating for the necessity of closures, giving ammunition to teachers and administrators intent on keeping kids at home. The Los Angeles Times ran a story in January 2021 about children “apologizing” to their elderly relatives for spreading COVID, and The New York Times published an article claiming COVID would “soar” if schools were allowed to reopen.
Other reports from the paper of record claimed that babies were “especially vulnerable” (March 2020), that it was risky for children to play together (June 2020), that children under 5 may host up to “100 times as much of the virus in the upper respiratory tract as adults” (July 2020), that virtual learning provided Black families a relief from racism (October 2020), and quoted teachers who said that teaching in-person was like being offered as “tribute” in The Hunger Games (November 2020). Over and over again, the Times published terrifying stories about “disturbing,” “mysterious” symptoms of an extremely rare inflammatory condition in children, stoking anxiety about new and unknown threats to kids without providing context.
Consistency has never been a virtue of those in control. Consistency is a threat to their power.Anyone else remember the campaign to shut down all Sports because of the Covid Myocarditis concerns?
Now that concern is minimized when it comes to Myocarditis as a side effect of the vaccine.