what-happened
GOLD
have you ever been to a hospital and seen how things work? Not your family practice office, but a hospital.Sure. Numbers were inflated and skewed. Inflated and skewed by 3% or so.
That is not an issue.
have you ever been to a hospital and seen how things work? Not your family practice office, but a hospital.Sure. Numbers were inflated and skewed. Inflated and skewed by 3% or so.
That is not an issue.
So show me how it’s done. Explore your theory. Give an explanation for why in home tests might move the case peak.
The vaccinated are only incentivized to take unreported ‘at home’ tests to get out of isolation.
Vax/unvax reporting bias doesn’t really wash as an explanation. Even if only 10% of vax cases get reported, that just forces the curve lower. It doesn‘t change the peak timing unless you have some reason that the reporting bias would change over time.
Your theory is that New York residents stopped getting PCR tests because isolation rules changed for Californians?The statement:
What changed at or near the peak of the vaccinated positive reported cases?
It was the removal of incentive for vaccinated individuals to test, excepting to test out of isolation on Monday, December 27th.
![]()
Where do you come up with 3%?Sure. Numbers were inflated and skewed. Inflated and skewed by 3% or so.
That is not an issue.
Very old ground that has been rehashed several times here. He’s going to say with the omicron because it’s more inflated than it was but if you look back at the records the with/for split was around 20-40%/80%~60% and Is now more than 50/50 by most guesses. 3% is laughable.Where do you come up with 3%?
We haven't had a break down of the numbers.
If it were just 3% Biden wouldn't be talking about changing the standards. The number is far greater.
Wonder what would have been more effective, Mask Mandates or a Diet and Excercise Mandate:Are you fat-shaming the obese? Where’s their freedom? Is there a body type that should be seen as ideal? Maybe we could start youth clubs to promote such ideas and to groom out the undesirables that may hinder our great American destiny! Eh Jojo?
It was until they tried to keep the schools shut.Yeah it's a bit funny to read the comments about how shutting down schools was so bad for our kids but now that they can go back the schools just suck, close them down. Sorta weird. Part of the overall fatalism I guess. With my 2ed grader there were challenges with the shut down to be sure, but some highlights too. When the time came was it far better for her to go back to a professional trained to teach her age group? Absolutely. I would have thought greater respect for teachers might have been something universal to come out of this whole experience. But I guess not.
It was until they tried to keep the schools shut.
the choice thing was made worse by the leadership sending their kids to private schools which were open while public’s were shut. Then the entire crt thing hit and the bottom dropped out.
Very old ground that has been rehashed several times here. He’s going to say with the omicron because it’s more inflated than it was but if you look back at the records the with/for split was around 20-40%/80%~60% and Is now more than 50/50 by most guesses. 3% is laughable.
50% is laughable.
I just spent several seconds trying to find public school fraud in San Diego -- nothing comes up (except for that A3 charter school fiasco). I'm not saying it doesn't exist, but I'm not finding it. Can you send me some links? I'm willing to listen here. The problem is it's incredibly difficult to commit fraud in public schools due to all of the checks and balances -- it's also the reason why people complain about bureaucracy in our school system. I mean just go to any school board meeting and what the brown act unfold.
Your theory is that New York residents stopped getting PCR tests because isolation rules changed for Californians?
Summer 2020.Very old ground that has been rehashed several times here. He’s going to say with the omicron because it’s more inflated than it was but if you look back at the records the with/for split was around 20-40%/80%~60% and Is now more than 50/50 by most guesses. 3% is laughable.
Grace made no effort to explain where the numbers came from, or what they measure.50% is laughable.
Didn't they have to test everyone to determine whether they needed to be "isolated" or not?Grace made no effort to explain where the numbers came from, or what they measure.
I think she's referring to the split between those who are sick because of covid, and those who have covid but are sick for another reason.
I have no idea where she gets the 40/60 assertion. Pulled the number out of thin air as far as I can tell.
I explained the claim of 3% of all hospital admissions. You'd have to combine it with covid hospital admissions to compare it to Grace's split.
The 3% is probably an overestimate. Not everyone got tested in hospital back then. Why waste a test on a healthy 25 year old with a broken leg?
As soon as they had enough tests, yes.Didn't they have to test everyone to determine whether they needed to be "isolated" or not?
I made no effort because the conversation was kicked to death already, including several estimates from various hospital staff. It’s not just hospitalizations btw but also deaths (an overcount you’ll remember espola assured us could never happen and led to several states revising their numbers). In any case the conversation bores me. You are increasingly grasping at straws as your world view and narrative crumble around you. 3% is laughable…only you could come up with such a number.Grace made no effort to explain where the numbers came from, or what they measure.
I think she's referring to the split between those who are sick because of covid, and those who have covid but are sick for another reason.
I have no idea where she gets the 40/60 assertion. Pulled the number out of thin air as far as I can tell.
I explained the claim of 3% of all hospital admissions. You'd have to combine it with covid hospital admissions to compare it to Grace's split.
The 3% is probably an overestimate. Not everyone got tested in hospital back then. Why waste a test on a healthy 25 year old with a broken leg?
Didn't they have to test everyone to determine whether they needed to be "isolated" or not?
This is true.You are increasingly grasping at straws as your world view and narrative crumble around you.
Show me the 40/60 number for summer 2020, back when Fox started making the claim and you all started parroting it.I made no effort because the conversation was kicked to death already, including several estimates from various hospital staff. It’s not just hospitalizations btw but also deaths (an overcount you’ll remember espola assured us could never happen and led to several states revising their numbers). In any case the conversation bores me. You are increasingly grasping at straws as your world view and narrative crumble around you. 3% is laughable…only you could come up with such a number.
Wow, if we apply your theory to the rest of the world the mortality rate drops below 1%.Show me the 40/60 number for summer 2020, back when Fox started making the claim and you all started parroting it.