There are a lot of people who spent too much time these past two years worried about how not to die and not enough time actually living.
There are a lot of people who spent too much time these past two years worried about how not to die and not enough time actually living.
It’s above. I posted the study days ago. I don’t know if it’s right or wrong but that’s why they are postulating covid collapsed in Japan while at the same time is seasonally exploding in south korea
do better. Try and keep up if you want to play
As long as you think of ”do masks work” as a yes/no question, it won’t make any sense.Annoying= “I don’t like that you are pointing out obvious things that make me uncomfortable”
Uniformed= “you are a heretic that doesn’t understand the true faith”
In any case I didn’t say “all”. I said “certain”. And I purposefully didn’t call you out by name, though your wearing an n95 to the market (which primarily is geared to protecting you and not others and which either points out you are concerned about yourself or you don’t really believe your own rhetoric about masks work) does make me suspect that (whether you admit it or not) you would be uncomfortable with that scenario. I’d also take you at your word were you to say yeah while not thrilled I’m not particularly frightened of catching covid (though to date I don’t think we’ve heard you say that).
Where our disagreement has been is you say “in the middle” which on a macro basis I find laughable given the effects we see worldwide (even in vaxx plus mask areas). The correct answer is “a little” which helped a bit against the prime, not much against the delta and probably does bubkis against omicron.As long as you think of ”do masks work” as a yes/no question, it won’t make any sense.
Their effectiveness is neither zero nor one. It’s in the middle.
That makes them ineffective as personal protection, but very effective on a population wide scale…. if your population does the basics like moving life outside and giving other people some space.
It’s your micro/macro distinction, except you’ve had it backwards the whole time.
Ps even your vaunted Bangladesh study if you discount all the criticism and note it was mostly pre delta doesn’t show it will work on a population wide basis. All the evidence (even looking at Scotland v England or orange v Los Angeles county) show it doesn’t. But that’s the essence of religion and belief in a talisman…you’ll never give it up as a matter if faith.Where our disagreement has been is you say “in the middle” which on a macro basis I find laughable given the effects we see worldwide (even in vaxx plus mask areas). The correct answer is “a little” which helped a bit against the prime, not much against the delta and probably does bubkis against omicron.
And I have it backwards? I’m not the one who wears an n95 to the supermarket. Your n95 does nothing to add to the collective welfare. If the collective welfare is your concern that’s an indication you either: a. Don’t believe your own rhetoric about masks or b. Are scared and concerned for yourself.
finally I find it laughable that you think people are moving things outside and giving people space still. See pictures of bars in New York? Thanksgiving in the northeast? The mayor up their repeatedly partying? Even most blue checks aren’t doing that except in places they can pressure point like schools (my last business trip a month ago 30% of the airport had chin diapers). Distancing might be Shangri la to an introvert like you…most people won’t do it for 3 plus years and if govt tries to force it at this point you see mass civil unrest.
Can we discuss things without going off on tangents? We start talking about the difference between individual and population scale protections. The next paragraph, you’re discussing the fact that the mayor of SF is a self-absorbed twit. Ok. She’s a twit. Can we stay on topic?Where our disagreement has been is you say “in the middle” which on a macro basis I find laughable given the effects we see worldwide (even in vaxx plus mask areas). The correct answer is “a little” which helped a bit against the prime, not much against the delta and probably does bubkis against omicron.
And I have it backwards? I’m not the one who wears an n95 to the supermarket. Your n95 does nothing to add to the collective welfare. If the collective welfare is your concern that’s an indication you either: a. Don’t believe your own rhetoric about masks or b. Are scared and concerned for yourself.
finally I find it laughable that you think people are moving things outside and giving people space still. See pictures of bars in New York? Thanksgiving in the northeast? The mayor up their repeatedly partying? Even most blue checks aren’t doing that except in places they can pressure point like schools (my last business trip a month ago 30% of the airport had chin diapers). Distancing might be Shangri la to an introvert like you…most people won’t do it for 3 plus years and if govt tries to force it at this point you see mass civil unrest.
You math guys always mess up the assumptions. Again it’s why they don’t trust you with the big decisions. Just because you have a50% (which is laughable…no one has found that) individual basis does not mean it scales to a population basis. The micro is actually an incidence count. The MACRO IS FOR THE VERY REASON YOU OUTLINE: repeated exposures and (the variable you ALWAYS miss time and time again…little pun) time. It’s called the scaling problem in economics. There’s also the imperfections curve (that as you scale little errors creep in like people not wearing masks properly). You’ve just disproven your own beliefs, you don’t even realize it, and because of your blind faith you don’t even see itCan we discuss things without going off on tangents? We start talking about the difference between individual and population scale protections. The next paragraph, you’re discussing the fact that the mayor of SF is a self-absorbed twit. Ok. She’s a twit. Can we stay on topic?
As I said, you have it backwards.
A 50% reduction to transmission doesn’t mean much to an individual suffering repeated exposure over a prolonged period. Eventually, you get unlucky.
A 50% reduction to transmission for a population is the difference between a disease that goes nowhere and a disease which doubles every 2 weeks.
More simply, masks are minorly effective on an individual scale, but reasonable effective on a population scale.
What you do with that information is up to you.
Ugh. 75% attack rate.
High transmission among vax, high transmission among previously infected, and high hospitalization rate among the young.
Hope it doesn't hold up as new data comes in.
Who?Where?Everyone I know took precautions and lived their lives.
Have you seen this personally or is this a hunch, a guess or something you were told?
Can we discuss things without going off on tangents? We start talking about the difference between individual and population scale protections. The next paragraph, you’re discussing the fact that the mayor of SF is a self-absorbed twit. Ok. She’s a twit. Can we stay on topic?
As I said, you have it backwards.
A 50% reduction to transmission doesn’t mean much to an individual suffering repeated exposure over a prolonged period. Eventually, you get unlucky.
A 50% reduction to transmission for a population is the difference between a disease that goes nowhere and a disease which doubles every 2 weeks.
More simply, masks are minorly effective on an individual scale, but reasonable effective on a population scale.
What you do with that information is up to you.
I took down my satire pic. This is not something to take lightly anymore. The desperation of these people to get people to take a shot is crazy and I would wait until more facts come out until you do any more injections. I'm a light hearted guy and make satire to talk about taboo subjects and subjects no one dare talk about. It takes a Scorpio man to deal with these Psychopaths who become killers. I'm not going to make anymore jokes about this and no more funny and goofy memes. Were past being cute & funny. This is hitting close to home and friends. I just got off the phone with a pal who works with someone who died, "unknown cause at this time." Yes he got all the jabs but no one wants to admit the Elephant in the room. Last year, it would be a Covid 19 death 100%. BTW, take the following "DELTA" & "OMICROM" and you spell, "Media Control." This is 100% worse then the Jim Jones Kool Aid.WOW......There is going to be a Huge awakening in 6 - 12 months of people who realize
they've been Jim Jones Koolaid duped by the Fauci " Kill Shot ".
Below is an updated ( Dec 3rd, 2021 ) link by a Dr Coleman who is ever increasing
the list of individuals adversely affected/Killed by the 1,2,3 or more Covid Jabs.
Look at the increase in Feild Sports players having serious heart conditions
while playing, everyone had the " Jab ".
This is beyond sad anymore, it's just plain EVIL and GRUESOME.
UPDATED: How Many People Are the Vaccines Killing? | Dr Vernon Coleman
I took down my satire pic. This is not something to take lightly anymore. The desperation of these people to get people to take a shot is crazy and I would wait until more facts come out until you do any more injections. I'm a light hearted guy and make satire to talk about taboo subjects and subjects no one dare talk about. It takes a Scorpio man to deal with these Psychopaths who become killers. I'm not going to make anymore jokes about this and no more funny and goofy memes. Were past being cute & funny. This is hitting close to home and friends. I just got off the phone with a pal who works with someone who died, "unknown cause at this time." Yes he got all the jabs but no one wants to admit the Elephant in the room. Last year, it would be a Covid 19 death 100%. BTW, take the following "DELTA" & "OMICROM" and you spell, "Media Control." This is 100% worse then the Jim Jones Kool Aid.
I have no dog in the hunt whether the study is right or wrong. I just found it fascinating. To pull a dad4, I didn’t know you had epidemiological chops. They must given your other wisdom here be formidible to be so opining on the biological processes. I look forward to your treatise on why the theory is so obviously wrong. Make sure to send it to Japan asap “Salute, don corleone!”Handwaving does not overcome a denial of basic biology.
I have no dog in the hunt whether the study is right or wrong. I just found it fascinating. To pull a dad4, I didn’t know you had epidemiological chops. They must given your other wisdom here be formidible to be so opining on the biological processes. I look forward to your treatise on why the theory is so obviously wrong. Make sure to send it to Japan asap “Salute, don corleone!”
Your arguments have degenerated to a handful of pithy phrases ranging from the classic “nonsense” to “handwaiving” to “strawman” and “gaslighting”. The best part is you don’t understand most of them.Just more handwaving. Referring back to your previous mistakes and then disavowing them is not a valid argument.
You don't need to be an epidemiologist to understand basic biology.