fingers crossed either vaccines hold up or that it's very mild. because as I've said, society is at a breaking point...going back to square 1 march 2020 topples the whole thing over.
"Society is at a breaking point"? Looks like you are panicking.
fingers crossed either vaccines hold up or that it's very mild. because as I've said, society is at a breaking point...going back to square 1 march 2020 topples the whole thing over.
This goes to an issue I had for the first months to year of the whole thing. Blaming T for not stopping the virus. And a lot of people believed that.Some don't think they'll be able to produce an omicron specific vaccine, given the transmissibility, before it overwhelms the world. Therefore they hope: a) natural/vaccine immunity holds up against severe disease and/or b) it's mild. Everyone's going to get it.
"Society is at a breaking point"? Looks like you are panicking.
see Morgan stanley above.
How would you know?
A machine learning expert is having a public disagreement with a biostatistician. You don’t know jack about either field.
Instead, you approve of whichever opinion is closest to the opinion you held in April of 2020. In this case, the machine learning guy.
see Morgan stanley above.
Look closer. The characters are drawn smaller so he can show them standing 6 feet apart.like it. The problem is also illustrated in the cartoon: 'I don't want to get sick'. she thinks the masks is just fine protection so she approaches her friend to have a mask discussion. Classic. --^=
Look closer. The characters are drawn smaller so he can show them standing 6 feet apart.
It’s from April, 2020. It has aged better than most things written back then.
At that time, you were trying to convince people that masks had a significant risk of infection from touching the outside.
We've become such a hysterical and weak society, reacting to every shadow around.This goes to an issue I had for the first months to year of the whole thing. Blaming T for not stopping the virus. And a lot of people believed that.
The reality is no matter who is in charge it is going to spread. Just look at the various govs in W Europe to see this is the case.
It was a completely partisan charge made by a partisan press.
Everyone is going to get exposed to the virus at some point and time and likely multiple times.
Look how fast it spread initially. Look at how you see the new variant already popping up all over the world.
When you say “Grace was accurate”, you are error checking against your own opinion.No it hasn't:
a. I thought we had moved off of the entire masks protect me. Yet she clearly thinks they do
b. It's unclear if they are indoors or outdoors.
c. Is it 6 feet....Looks a little closer given their relative sizes?
d. O.k. arguendo 6 feet. She approaches him at 6 feet even though he's unmasked (doing a little gender assuming here) and then proceeds to discuss masks!
e. The 6 foot thing has also been shown to have no basis in science.
f. you like to mischaracterize opinions particularly in situations where you've lost. You'll recall I said masks help a little....probably most in indoor situations with short contacts (not long like at work or on a plane)...why I speculating on a bunch of reasons including lack of a seal, poor quality masks, viruses building on the surface when you cough or sneeze to later be dislodged, people touching their masks (particularly kids), people (particularly kids) not being able to wear them properly. Between the 2 of us, 1 of us (not you) was more right than the other, and the main flaw in my reasoning was we believed (from people like you and what you were saying) in the surface transmission of COVID.
When you say “Grace was accurate”, you are error checking against your own opinion.
Put another way, your opinion in April 2020 is an excellent predictor of your opinion in December 2021. This is unarguably true.
It is also equivalent to saying “I have learned almost nothing”.
You have learned nothing. Reread the study.Errr....."You have learned almost nothing"......spoken like a true pastor....even your Bangladesh study (where we started this today) agreed with me on cloth masks. Guess I was before my time. Boo-yah!
You have learned nothing. Reread the study.
The study does not come to any conclusion at all on cloth masks. But you think it agrees with you.
The study does come to a conclusion on surgical masks, and it disagrees with you. But this fact has yet to sink in.
The constancy of your thought patterns remains unparalleled. If I want to know your opinions on next year’s research, I can look at your posts from last year.