Glad to hear we are all finally on the same page.So anywhere people work together or live together...ahhh....got it.
You forgot to add "play together", but we'll get there.
Glad to hear we are all finally on the same page.So anywhere people work together or live together...ahhh....got it.
Glad to hear we are all finally on the same page.
You forgot to add "play together", but we'll get there.
First of all, call it what you want; Secondly, who gives a damn; Lastly, you're a grown-ass "man" freakishly lurking in a kids soccer forum without kids playing who turned into a weak-ass bedwetting schoolgirl over an elected US President.I said I was a Republican until Nixon (and I recognized that error).
Wow! Should've did what FL did. See you're not beating that drum anymore.
Its mandated for specific instances but not the pubs, which are finally open , no correlation I'm sure . No mandate for kids under 13 either, btw.IIRC Ireland has a mask mandate too if I recall.
Last sentence comes from Grace, not the article.The Lancet study and commentary.....peakloads for vaxxed and unvaxxed were similar but vaxxed clearances were shorter (doesn't help if you live or work with someone)....breakthroughs mild....editorial states vaccine effect on reducing transmission is minimal but does exist....protection from infection lasts only 2-3 months. Current vaccines are therefore unlikely in and of themselves (at least without natural immunity) to make COVID go away
Community transmission and viral load kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the UK: a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study
Vaccination reduces the risk of delta variant infection and accelerates viral clearance. Nonetheless, fully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections have peak viral load similar to unvaccinated cases and can efficiently transmit infection in household settings, including to fully...www.thelancet.com
Spanos family won't need to sell due to estate taxes
When the patriarch of a family that owns an NFL franchise passes, one of the most important questions becomes whether the transfer of his ownership interest to other family members will trigger the kind of estate-tax obligation that will make it impossible for the family to pay the taxes without…profootballtalk.nbcsports.com
It's because he's full of shit.For a person who says they were repub up until t came around...you sure love government intrusion.
I have yet to see you take a position contrary to less gov intervention.
The unrealized cap gains idea is terrible on a variety of levels. One would think that would be blindingly obvious.
A. NoLast sentence comes from Grace, not the article.
The article notes that one implication of the study is that we need higher vax rates. Grace decided to omit that part, assert the opposite herself, and pretend that her conclusion somehow came from Lancet.
Would you stop this? You repeatedly mix your own personal opinion in, as though it came from the actual scientists. It's either amazingly sloppy writing, or a deliberate attempt to pretend that your opinion has more support than it really does.
I feel well refuted by an article dated after the Charges had moved that states they don’t have to sell an interest in the team due to estate taxes. Thanks.
Yes it is.You present this like its a bad thing. My answer is "Hell no, I'm not vaccinated" (is it under penalty of perjury?).
A. No
B. I post the article you can read it and make up your own minds
C. Yes it’s sloppy. Don’t have time to spoon feed you. Doing a ton of things simultaneously. This forum is occupying maybe 10% of my attention. There is a period there for a reason.
D. I agree we need higher vax rates. Whether we can get them is another story as is whether we should do what we need to do to get them.
It’s a study dumb dumb in the lancet and the accompanying article is the official commentaryWhy do you bother to post these bullshit articles? Is it so that you can refer back to them later ("articles posted earlier in this thread") as if they had been legitimized?
It’s a study dumb dumb in the lancet and the accompanying article is the official commentary
Isn’t that how Cheney started the whole WMD thing?Why do you bother to post these bullshit articles? Is it so that you can refer back to them later ("articles posted earlier in this thread") as if they had been legitimized?
Spoon feed? Bull crap. This is about you being deliberately misleading, yet again. You toss your opinion in alongside the Lancet opinion, making absolutely no distinction between the two.A. No
B. I post the article you can read it and make up your own minds
C. Yes it’s sloppy. Don’t have time to spoon feed you. Doing a ton of things simultaneously. This forum is occupying maybe 10% of my attention. There is a period there for a reason.
D. I agree we need higher vax rates. Whether we can get them is another story as is whether we should do what we need to do to get them.
The article itself is good. The bull shit comes in when Grace misrepresents their contents.Why do you bother to post these bullshit articles? Is it so that you can refer back to them later ("articles posted earlier in this thread") as if they had been legitimized?